Print
PDF

Celtic 2 St.Mirren 0

Written by Fraser Anderson.

St Mirren wilted to a 2-0 defeat this afternoon against SPL champions Celtic at Parkhead this afternoon. Goals from Victor Wanyama and Gary Hooper either side of the interval were enough to seal victory against Saints, who frankly looked beaten from the first minute.

Lee Mair’s suspension warranted a personnel shake-up from Danny Lennon. Jon Robertson entered the fray so Jim Goodwin could partner Marc McAusland at centre back, whilst Sam Parkin was sacrificed for Dougie Imrie who stepped in to shore up the left wing. The cautious 4-5-1 formation was employed to best avoid a repeat of recent thrashings at the same venue.

From the first kick it was obvious what the day’s task was. That was to form a human wall in front of the St Mirren goal and pick up any scraps. Yet these scraps weren’t forthcoming as Celtic highlighted the huge difference between the sides – holding the ball succinctly, moving the ball on at pace, and a sweeter first touch were such examples of their dominance, not to mention the overwhelming share of possession. Although it was Saints who should have drawn first blood after a couple of minutes. Imrie failed to bury an early chance for the Saints when Gary Teale’s cross was flicked to the back post, but the midfielder took a touch instead of hammering a shot towards goal.

Celtic then had several penalty claims with which to trouble the referee. Of their two credible shouts, the first protestation occurred after some ricocheting inside the Saints’ penalty area, where Callum Murray adjudged that the ball in fact did not strike the arm of Jim Goodwin. Their second appeal came when Gary Hooper tumbled theatrically in the box, however Murray’s failure to penalise Hooper cost Saints from the resulting corner. Charlie Mulgrew’s in-swinger was well saved by Samson from Wanyama’s header, yet the Kenyan had time to stab home the rebound to put the hosts deservedly in front after 15 minutes of play.

From here, many Buddies in the away end dreaded another mauling at the hands of the Bhoys. And it did appear to be a case of when, rather than if, Celtic would add to their tally. Georgios Samaras caused a whole host of problems to both midfield and defence with stylish, penetrating runs. St Mirren’s back line were giving their opponent’s attackers far too much space and thinking time on the twenty-five yard line, and efforts from Wanyama, Ambrose and Samaras yielded no reward. The away support were unanimously praying for the half time whistle as they were cold, fed up and wishing to keep the scoreline respectable to aid a second half comeback. I doubt the majority resented the defensive style, but perhaps showed legitimate frustration at the ineptitude of the counter attack. Perhaps the use of wingers Teale and Imrie as defensive wing-backs stunted any attacking potency.

Celtic’s overwhelming supremacy in the first half predicted the programme of the second. Samaras’ cross formed the basis for the hosts’ next chance minutes into the second forty-five. His delicate chip to the back post was headed down by Hooper to Scott Brown, but the captain’s header was superbly saved on the line by Craig Samson. The home crowd screamed that the header had crossed the line, but the assistant referee was adamant that no goal was scored, and the ball was cleared to safety. Jim Goodwin looked the epitome of confidence in central defence, and further endeared himself to the Saints support with two goal saving blocks. He looked fearless of his opponents, and showed daring courage to literally put his body on the line for the cause.

With the score still somehow at 1-0, there was a clawing hope of resurgency. John McGinn came close to emulating the fortunes of elder brother Steven almost five years to the day, but his well-placed shot lacked the power to beat Fraser Forster.

The second half was a marginal improvement on the first. However Celtic were still first to every ball, and their nonchalant link-up play summarised the wealth of resources they have available to them. Yet Saints, Goodwin aside, looked afraid. They looked overwhelmed by the occasion and displayed little confidence while failing to create anything further of real ingenuity. The home support’s bizarre camera flash protest failed to light the path to a Paisley revival. Kenny McLean’s snap-shot flew over the bar and scuffed a shot towards goal, while Teale fired a shot well wide of goal when presented with space on the edge of the box. McGinn’s earlier chance appeared to be as good as things would get for the Buddies. An unrelenting but tired Steven Thompson was substituted for Sam Parkin to provide fresh strength up front.

Such frustration was compounded when Jim Goodwin picked up a ridiculous booking midway through the second half. His clean, sliding tackle won the ball cleanly from the path of Scott Brown yet referee Murray deemed the incident a foul, and worse yet a caution. The cynic in me would hedge his bets that if that tackle were made by any of the other twelve Buddies out there today, no such punishment would have been deemed necessary. In an attempt to chase the game, Jon Robertson was substituted for Lewis Guy to give the battling Buddies two strikers in their quest for parity.

With the briefly promising Saints spell came a determination from the Parkhead side to close this game. Mikael Lustig’s header crashed off the crossbar from Charlie Mulgrew’s corner, before free-kick specialist Mulgrew’s effort flew inches past Samson’s left-hand post. However it was Gary Hooper who added the final touch to an already-well decorated performance on 83 minutes. Mulgrew’s corner was cleared off the back of the Buddies’ defence, and Hooper reacted quickest to hook the ball into the roof of the net to cue a mass exodus from the home (yet strangely not away) support.
 
 

And the final score remained thus. The score flattered St Mirren immeasurably - Celtic were given a taste of their own medicine similar to their home tie against Barcelona, where they restricted their hosts to unrelenting passing to break down a steadfast defence. Between the chances highlighted above, feel free to fill in the blanks using your memories of that game. In fact picture a cat pawing a defenceless mouse, dangling by its tail. What Barcelona failed to do that night, Celtic managed to do with ease this afternoon. At no point did they look rushed, flustered or by any means uncomfortable. By contrast the hosts were calm, concise, clinical…and above all they were patient.

The job today was always going to be a tough one. Yet the yielding manner in which Saints seemed to just accept their fate was incredibly disappointing. It was a spirited defensive performance, granted. But the basics were wrong today. Too much focus was placed on defending, while the team looked unorganised in attack. No one seemed to know where to move the ball, and the minimal forays forward were accompanied with fear and trepidation. What today highlights is a real need for a strong, no-nonsense centre back. Much like Jim Goodwin today who incidentally is my Star Saint. The defence needs a strong leader: one who will throw himself at shots, organise effectively and lead by example. Such confidence was displayed today by our captain, yet unfortunately not by his colleagues.
 

Comments  

 
0 # FrankieMac 2012-12-17 10:22
It's all over the papers today how St Mirren's tactics were a total disgrace and I have to say I agree. Lennon needs to go NOW !!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # David Adam 2012-12-17 11:52
Our tactics and performance at Parkhead seemed to finally acknowledge the fact that whilst we might be living within our means, we are certainly out of our league in the SPL.
Even the likes of Kilmarnock, Inverness, St Johnstone and Arbroath competed more purposefully (and successfully) against Celtic at Parkhead than the Buddies did on Saturday.
This was truly an embarrassing performance - in the same league as Czeckoslovakia v Scotland.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Jack on Arran 2012-12-17 16:17
We will just have to admit it.................... we have a loser for a manager !!
I feel sorry for the team that they are required to play his "defeatest tactics"
Ok so we would get beaten at Parkhead but the terrible thing is that we DID NOT compete................ and that is the managers fault.
Have you ever read anything more idiotic than his latest comments............ the fact that we only lost by 2 goals is an improvement and encouraging !!
And we are suppposed to be a proud and far seeking premier division side.
Arbroath have more ambition than our manager.!
Maybe his time is coming to a close but a) can we afford to, get rid of him and b) who could we get who is better and will do a better job.
We are not the greatest club in the world to manage ......especially when the Board will not give him any money to strengthen the team.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-17 20:43
I see the webteam have at last reognised we need a new centre-half the same idea i suggested two months ago.The only thing relevant about this is they do not have the bottle to tell gilmour to get one so it will be up to the real fans to give him a jolt.I also wanted us two years ago to go for butcher but knew we would not as he would be to much a threat to this chairmans dominance The supporters are irrelevant to him as this is why during the liquadation farce he ignored the support and was consulting with sally mcoist and blue and green.Think about saturdays game we have a manager {and some players who think(the poops are special) so we go their with an inferiority complex but arbroath proved over two games they are not Do not get me wrong i want us to win on friday but if we do dont be kidded premier league players must be signed.to move us up the league
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-17 22:05
Dannys report at whitburn primary was as follows.Not very relevant at maths but (celtic daft) goes weakat the knees when confronted by anything green.Unfortunately this is applicable to some of saints playersas well. I posted these facts weeks ago and was told by the bald div i was hallucinating well 22-0 down since danny arrived proves otherwise.We will have to rid ourselves of this rotten core there is only one inevitable answer.and that is change...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Old Tam 2012-12-17 22:15
Danny Lennon saluted his Buddies for the way they bravely tried to fend off title chasing Celtic during Saturday’s 2-0 SPL defeat in the east end of Glasgow.
And manager Lennon praised his side for making life as difficult as possible for the Old Firm giants.
He said: “I think Celtic certainly deserved to win the game.
“We basically came here and showed Celtic the respect they deserved but to lose from two set plays was disappointing.
But to come here and get a little bit closer was pleasing.

ABSOLUTE AR SE HOLE (That's ME talking now)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # jimmy h 2012-12-17 22:25
Quote of the week Sunday Mail which Lennon said We can take Great Confidence from today our Discipline Commitment Attitude and Organisation were all First Class. Clue we are second bottom and 5 points in front of Dundee who have a game in hand oh and had one shot on target and 34% of possession Lennon is on a different planet He probably thinks it was a moral victory because we only got beat 2 0
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Nick 2012-12-18 16:02
Think the main problem with being adamant that a manager should be sacked, and being so public about it, is it means you essentially want your team to get beaten!
Many of the contributors on here would look pretty stupid if Danny turned things round and we finished in the top 6, so for their own credibility I can only imagine they want St Mirren to lose.
Makes for a pretty miserable time attending games I would have thought.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # eriic 2012-12-18 19:01
Top six.I THINK A PR IN FRONT ICK IS NEEDED.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-18 19:50
I will answer you in a more conventional manner,Firstly as i was one of the contributors i stated i wanted saints to win on Friday making your statement wrong.In essence the only reason we are moaning is we hate losing so this contradicts anything you commented on.And your comment on being miserable at games the way results have gone we are not exactly in ecstasy. .
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Jack on Arran 2012-12-18 20:14
I do not understand you, Nick, if you are happy by the way we have played over the last 2/3 months and by the results we have obtained.
We write in these negative tones because we are so dissappointed at the reversal of form over the last 2/3 months and at the seemingly unresponsive approach being taken by our manager,
We are all "TRUE SAINT MIRREN SUPPORTERS" who only want the best for our team but feel that the manager is not reflecting the feelings of the supporters when he makes idiotic statements to the press praising the opposition and telling us that to lose 2 0 is a great achievement.
We also questiion the Board who seem to have nothing to say to the fans regarding the future of the club and the strengthening of the squad.
When they were looking for money to finance the "take over" they were very volitile but now not a sound from them.
Friday night is a BIG night for all concerned.
Hope we get a good Xmas from the team
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Nick 2012-12-19 09:17
My point was just that if you assert an opinion over and over again on a public forum then you clearly feel strongly about it and want people to know that this is your opinion - to which you are very much entitled of course. Now if St Mirren continue to struggle and the manager gets sacked then you have made an astute assessment of the situation, however if St Mirren go on to have a successful season (and it is, unquestionably, very much in the balance at this moment in time) then it will appear that those screaming for the manager to be sacked know very little about football.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Old Tam 2012-12-19 13:49
Nick, people are just expressing an opinion out of frustration. However the reason that you hear the same opinions over a long period must mean that the situation has been on going for too long. If Lennon was doing well then you wouldn't hear the bad comments.
Your point about whether he goes on to have a successful season is nonsensical as if that were the case no manager in football would ever be sacked until June. The simple answer is that owners cannot afford to take such a chance. Therefor managers get sacked after a period of poor results usually. The exception being Alex Ferguson and if you are suggesting Lennon is another Fergie then fair enough but somehow I don't think he is. People power is usually a good judge and they are the customer so they are indeed entitled to influence the outcome. So it doesn't matter what may happen in the future..it's NOW that counts.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Nick 2012-12-19 14:55
Fair enough Tam, the bottom line is we are one of the poorest supported teams in the league, and as a result have one of the lowest budgets. Every St Mirren manager in my lifetime has been hounded out of the job, maybe its time we as a support ask ourselves exactly what our expectations are. The wonderful glories days of the 80's where we won 1 trophy and got to the 2nd round of the UEFA cup are gone.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-19 20:45
And pray tell me does Inverness s johnsone have a massive support.so they should not have high expectations that is not the signals i am getting.I would also like to ask you if you have been confiding with s.gilmour because your statement is right(out his phrasebook)Inst ead of critising lack of support its lack of funds for decent players thats the problem.In essence look at the team we have given away by this board to teams around us sutton higdon.tesselar .hasssselbank etc all for a little extra wages.And dont give me the guff they have no money there asset building over the last few years has been top notch.To sugges we expect to much is irrelevant nonsense.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-19 21:21
And also when hibs were in trouble last seasonthey were almost relegated and there support plummetedThis season the board stepped in and brought in good signings look at the difference.In essence if a board are interested in improving things on the park then it can make a difference All i see is our chairman at hampden trying to improve his bank balance and personna.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # GarryR 2012-12-20 08:49
Glad to see this forum hasn't changed at all! Still the same people on making the same points. I would like to think that the negative points made on here are the minority of the support as it would be soul destroying to imagine that we are that short sighted and cannot see the bigger picture! We have made improvements year on year with Danny at the helm and still there are calls for his head. I will ask the same question I always ask when this comes round, who would you have come in and do any better?? And where would you get the funds to a) Pay Lennon off for the rest of his contract b) find the funds for the new manager? Not to mention this would eat into any money available to strengthen the squad. Alex Ferguson was mentioned in one of the posts also, he took three years to turn it around at Man Utd. Lets face it, when he was manager of the saints, did anyone predict he would go on to be the greatest british manager of all time. Give Lennon and the team time!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Nick 2012-12-20 09:32
MLStewart, if lack of funds is the problem then it's hardly Danny Lennon's fault is it? Surely any manager we hired would then be faced with the same difficulties? I totally agree that we should be able to compete with the other so called provincial clubs, but the fact is that the likes of St Johnstone and Kilmarnock have strengthened their squads this season, in part by offering better contracts to St Mirren players whom we wanted to keep. That said, I still feel we have the makings of a decent side, our best player is due back from injury, we are still in both national cup competitions and we have some excellent homegrown talent breaking into the team. A couple of decent results over the festive period and the world will seem a different place - lets all get behind the team and help make it happen.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Jack on Arran 2012-12-20 10:18
We will always get behind the team and support them all the time BUT it is frustrating when the manager seems to be lifeless and not boyant.
Maybe it is not his style to scream and shout....... but occasionally for the supporters it would be a good thing !
I appreciate his hands are tied by the Board as regards strengthening the pool, but frequently his tactics and comments leave a lot to be desired.
I do not want to hear that.............. this team or that team are better than us.............. or that we were lucky to lose 2 0 and should be grateful that itr was only 2 !
I want a lot more of the "Terry Butcher" spirit.
I will give Danny a chance but he MUST relate more to the supporters feelings and expectations............ even if they are outlandish !
I bet the Board did not scrimp and save on their Xmas dinner so maybe they will not scrimp and save when the transfer window opens in January.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # David Adam 2012-12-20 11:12
Every team has its highs and lows in terms of performances and results (even Barcelona), but what has been disappointing this season is the diluting of our positive footballing ethos of last season (partly due to injuries) and a return to the more negative stodgy approach adopted by many clubs and the national team in recent years. The press strongly criticized the likes of Inter Milan in the Lisbon Lions era because of their over-defensive strategy - but at least they could defend. Our main problem this season is that we are leaking goals by the barrow-load. This problem has to be addressed whilst at the same time maintaining the attacking football longed for by the fans.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # MLSTEWAART 2012-12-20 11:37
And you have not changed one dot you are still as niave as ever.You suggest no one could answer your questions well i am the boy to do that.You say we have made improvements.My answer we are lower in the league than last season define that.Who do think would do better? .My answer two years ago on here i suggested terrry butcher but that would have been to ambitious and also to big a threat to gilmours dominanceWhere would we get the money to pay him off? The same place we got it to asset build for the envisaged sale.And in expecting lennon to be the next alex ferguson proves how far from realism you are or maybe you suffer from delusion..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # GarryR 2012-12-20 11:56
Haha, well hello there my old friend!! Yes, we have made improvements. If i remember correctly, you were on here at the tail end of last season spouting the same thing, turned out it was our highest finish for around 20-30 years in the league. I would deem that improvement. Granted we are sitting lower in the league this year but the seasons not finished! Also, if you read my question, I'm asking who we could get right now that would do a better job with the resources available, not in retrospect. I also think you'll also find that Butcher was under contract form Inverness at the time we appointed Lennon so would not have been a viable option. As for the funding, asset building is only going to generate more income for the club in the long run. It will also enable our team to train using the best of facilities which would also help attract a better calibre of player. Danny has came out and said that there is money available to strengthen the squad in January, not asset build.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # GarryR 2012-12-20 12:01
I was not expecting Lennon to become the next Ferguson, merely pointing out that even the greatest of managers will tell you it takes seasons to build a strong team, hence, Danny needs time. Unfortunately, the mind set of some supporters require instant success. A sad reflection of modern football
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-20 18:48
I am happy as a king (its the stewart in me}Why you may ask? SAINTMIRREN3 celtic 2.May be it was under 20s but i will accept itwith delight.Now the same to-morrow please against motherwell.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # jimmy h 2012-12-21 01:14
we have now lost 7 out of 8 i know we cant afford to get rid of danny but i do think he has to rethink how we play the game because we have no end result and if we dont get awin 2mor we will not be in a great place I think we will have to refresh our swad in jan to give us a chance to compete in the top six we have a big game at home to mortherwell lets hope we can get the right result and yes i will be there chearing our side on
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-22 11:36
I said we could beat motherwell.But why the complex when we play the poops.I also said kenny mclean would the first first piece of transfer news thiswill be done with supreme efficiency and us waiting on a c entre-half for months. We have needed acentre-half for months now but the wish of the fans is the last thing on this boards mind are you listening garryrAlso remember what i said (when we beat motherwell). we stillneed a couple premier of premier type players to propel up us up the league. In essence gilmour has had kenny sold for weeks now he thinks the fans are fools.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # GarryR 2012-12-22 13:23
Hahaha, MLSTEWART, your comments really are comical! Could you please tell me where you stated that Kenny McLean would be the first piece of transfer news? I certainly haven't seen it but I'm more than willing to put my hands up and give you credit if you can prove it. Anyway, there is only an article on the BBC website suggesting that Kenny might be going elsewhere, there is nothing concrete. Danny is merely stating that he is worried he could move in the transfer window. I would say that most Saints fans would have had similar thoughts. I also don't know if you realise but we can't sign a centre half outside of the transfer window unless they are a free agent so how were we supposed to do that? I agree that we need a decent centre half and I'm sure thats on the list of players Danny will be looking at as the same article states he has a few targets. You said we could beat Motherwell, I say we can beat any team in that league when we are playing at our best!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # MLSTEWART 2012-12-22 16:07
You are like an irrelevant schoolboy garryr/We can beat any team in the league how about 22-0 since lennon arrived against the poops so a usual you are SPOUTING nonsense.Comeback to me if mclean is still there after the window..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Ray Whitney Jersey 2013-03-18 03:43 Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh