Rather than rely on what some people claimed he said, I looked at the source material an shocker ozonise, he said nothing like what you are saying.
"Few people are in any doubt that President Milosevic bears the prime responsibility for the human tragedy in the Balkans. He and his supporters have subjected innocent civilians to daily assault, indignity and murder.
"However, if we are to sanction intervention in Serbia then the policy must be capable of achieving two things. It must be capable of weakening Milosevic, and helping Kosovo.
"A bombing campaign will achieve neither. Indeed, the chances are that it will make both worse.
"In virtually every country which has been blitzed this century, the reaction has been to steel the resolve of the civilian population. This is what happened in London in the Second World War. It is also what happened in Clydebank.
"Why should we believe that there will not be the same reaction in Serbia?
http://www.siol-nan-gaidheal.org/kosovo.htm
At worst you can say he was wrong. You cannot say he did not advocate stopping kilos evil, he just said bombing him wasn't the right way.
Next?