Itsybitsy
-
Posts
39 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Itsybitsy
-
-
Is he not also an agent? Let's hope he didn't make money from players that have been signed recently.
-
8 hours ago, munoz said:
Unfortunately I don't think he wants a return home at this time.
As much as I think you are right - I hope you are wrong.
-
3 hours ago, bazil85 said:
Because someone is good in one role doesn't mean they'll automatically be good at an other. Great youth coach, would be a massive risk as manager at this stage. Also don't see him switching the big apple for Paisley anytime soon.
I agree that moving from the states will be a big shout and a hard sell however I think his love for the club would swing it in our favour. I also agree that being good in one role doesn't mean you will be good in another however every single football manager on the planet at one point took charge of their 1st professional team.
-
As I said in a previous thread Longwell would be my choice. His coopmmitment to the club is unrivalled, he is an ncredible coach, his record in bringing youth through is outstanding which let's be honest it is an area we will need to heavily rely on and add to that he was the only member of staff at the club whilst he was there that held a UEFA Pro Licence. I think that if the board to do approach home then they are not doing their job properly
-
16 hours ago, shull said:
So, you ain't going to have a guess ?
FFS
-
Just now, shull said:
So, you ain't going to have a guess ?
This is hard work ffs
I think I have made my point clear. If you dont get it you never will.
-
2 minutes ago, shull said:
Christ, you're hard work.
Missing every point given.
Just give me your Cup Final percentage estimate.
I think you will find it is you that is missing the point mate. My point was that decent supporters are being tarred by the actions of a few which is unfair.
You have admitted that every club including ours is not perfect.
I have friends / family members who support either side of the old firm and do not deserve to be called either disgusting or horrible for doing the same as we do - supporting out team. Deary me. It's really not difficult.
-
5 minutes ago, shull said:
If it was a real minority then the majority would shut them up, like we would do with ours at Greenhill Road.
So you admit that even our club isn't perfect?
It is the job of the club and the authorities to work together to eradicate them - not the job of the normal supporter who just wants to go along and support their team with no drama
And it is defiantly the minority - I didn't see 50,00 Rangers fans throwing plastic bottles - unless you are seeing things everyone missed? And I repeat I do not condone any fan that acts inappropriately.
-
2 minutes ago, shull said:
Why don't the majority silence the minority.
This is exactly my point - it is the minority however you are having them all guilty and that is unfair.
-
2 hours ago, shull said:
Also, if you think I reek of hatred, does that make you just as bad as moi ?
For being sensible and fair? I don't quite get you logic in that one to be honest.
-
22 hours ago, shull said:
I never said you did. Sevco fans think we made it up.
The vast majority of Sevco fans condone sectarianism, bigotry and hatred which pollutes Scottish Football.
They are a disgusting Club with horrible fans.
I think you will find this is what you said.
People should be able to support their team without being regarded to like you have done due the behavior of a minority. Your attitude is honking.
-
14 hours ago, shull said:
We won't.
But if anybody does, hopefully they will be banned for life from St Mirren Park.
Celtic and Sevco fans should be banned from from all the other 40 Stadiums in Scotland.
I am all for rivalry however asking their as you called them 'Disgusting' fans to be banned from every stadium reeks of hatred and makes you as bad as them.
-
19 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:
Unfortunately not. Our support have a choice to make. No need to sink to that level.
The same as every club which is my point.
-
2 minutes ago, shull said:
None.
Yeah Yeah. Every song in the ground is politically correct? I don't think so.
-
1 hour ago, shull said:
Give me a rough percentage estimate of how many Sevco fans will be singing sectarian and bigoted shite at the weekend ?
I will guess 99%.
The 1% will be tapping his foot to tune of hate.
Your guess ?
I think you will find both sets of supporters singing poor choice of songs however and bearing in mind that there will be only 800 sevco supporters there opposed to in excess of 50,000 of celtic supporters it is safe to say that even if it was the 99% as you suggest they will be in the huge minority.
1 supporter singing these songs is too many in my opinion.
How many hateful songs do you sing against the unwashed when we play them? People in glass houses and all that.
-
2 minutes ago, pozbaird said:
Aww, poor wee new forumster itsybitsyteenyweeny. Great alias.
Why poor me? It aint me with the 'Everyone is disgusting bar us' attitude. Poor you more like. Each to their own I guess.
-
1 minute ago, pozbaird said:
Pretty much, yeah. Next question.
Says more about you to be honest.
-
11 minutes ago, shull said:
Why don't the super huge element do something about the wee bad element ?
It would be easy to drown out, boo and whistle down the songs of hatred ?
We would do it, if we had a wee bad element in our support.
I don't disagree that more than can be done but calling them all disgusting is not a fair refection imo.
-
1 minute ago, shull said:
I never said you did. Sevco fans think we made it up.
The vast majority of Sevco fans condone sectarianism, bigotry and hatred which pollutes Scottish Football.
They are a disgusting Club with horrible fans.
So all 50,000 at a home game are disgusting? A bit harsh in my opinion. There is a bad element in them I agree but also some decent ones that just support their team in the same way we do.
-
2 minutes ago, shull said:
Not seen any Sevco 2012 fan saying sorry about the incident or vilifying the culprit.
They think we made it up.
I didn't insinuate it was made up - just it was unfair to blame all fans when only 1 was guilty.
-
1 hour ago, WeeBud said:
You think talking about a young girl being hit by a bottle thrown from amongst the Rangers support is blowing things out of proportion?? Or because you never saw it then it never happened.........the bottle just missed my daughter and hit another young girl one row behind and two seats away from us.
I can't condone this at all - not even slightly - however I think tarring 50,000 Rangers Supporters with the same brush after the actions of 1 is unfair.
-
Tick Tock. Man is a buffoon.
-
22 hours ago, munoz said:
The police are clueless in their methods of policing Scottish football.
Everyone that was at Ibrox will have witnessed that first hand.
I think you will find that this was totally blown out of proportion from what I saw. I am all for outing the Old Firm however nothing I saw was wrong.
-
Completely agree - doing the loan deal would create a good image of the club in this particular case. It would suit all parties and if the club didn't do it simply out of what seems like spite they'd be risking it going to court where who knows what could happen. I think if anyone's giving him advice it's probably Willie Smith - I know Kieran is unaware of what seems to be his ulterior motives and therefore, even if you do think the boy has went down the wrong path in terms of the contract, it's not necessarily right to blame him or his father fully.
It is a shame that the boy ad his father were not thinking at all of the PR of the club when they decided to go to the papers which is a shame and despite what you say about not blaming him or his father fully they both need to be fully responsible for their actions especially the father as the boy will take direction from him as most boys would.
As for Willie Smith his influence with the boy worries me and I am surprised that the boys father was not fully aware of both his real intentions and the police investigation he is involved with through a coach at his club. If it is Kiaran's Dad's intentions to protect and get the best for his son as is the case with most fathers it is very surprising that he has allowed his son to become involved with such a character - I would go as far to say that instead of protecting him he has actually allowed him to be used as a pawn by a man with a very chequered history to say the least. I certainly wouldn't like any son of mine to be used in such a way.
Darren Jackson
in General St. Mirren Discussion
Posted
I hope not as that would be a bitter pill to swallow