bluto

Why would he?He's getting so much attention by a swarm of #snpgooders. For a troll, that's nirvana... But you all know that! Or should know, by this time. He bleats - and you pile in, mob-handed. QED

Sorry, bud. Too late. Dave j's new wean is a girl and has already been named Rebecca.

At the Love Street end - aye.

Not feeling the love in here this evening....

I enjoyed this blast from my past... https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=At+last+the+1948+shore.&&view=detail&mid=4B6BB1F67208461F14E34B6BB1F67208461F14E3 start about 20m 20 seconds

Faint praise is better than dissing the players you have, surely?

and same at FT

I read the thread title and assumed it was for crowd control. Friday night - so popular with fans and taxi drivers....

Black and White. Always.

Careful now.. That £250 charitable gift was only for one week, if I read Herr dixon's post correctly - and I do. You can't diss someone's logic, if your own is not on solid ground. Ok. You can, but you shouldn't.

Sigh. In those olden days, Pantone was not the reliable colour gauge - as used by all quality producers of cheap fitba flags - that it has come to be. Yellow? Gold? Meh.

Thanks for the vote of confidence and solidarity, stu! I wis jist saying,like....

Silly Sonny!! No a dug - budgie. It tweeted.

Saw a tweet saying Peterborough would be putting in a 450k bid for Mallan... This could be in Groundless Rumours thread, as I don't really do Twitter, understand it and have only one follower after several years....

I think when I posted the following, I suggested why these three points need not be imagined in her support. It's all about being party to reducing the social housing pool. Thatcher hasn't brought the housing market to its current state all by herself.

Double negative, slarti. to me that amply demonstrates the contortions needed to defend the indefensible. oaksoft's point 3 is the winner. If there wasn't a market driven by the greedy who have access to funds that those who NEED social housing cannot utilise, then social housing would not be flogged off. Those who buy it are not philanthropists. They make more than a minimum profit on it - whether they take that in rent currently or in capital gains when they flog it on again. I've had opportunity to buy council stock, but have refused. My family has enjoyed this benefit for decades. When the time comes I hope another poor family does the same.

pozbaird's already working on boards to honour those who have burned brightest in it!

I wouldn't feel wholly comfortable if I bought stolen goods, despite my action being a step removed from the crime.. I suppose it's the thought that counts.

Aye.... He's skating on thin ice (as he hints) by posting this stuff as even James Dolman (from whom he may have picked the charges up) is now loathe to host them on his site. It's good to read the litany of charges but you don't want to prejudice court proceedings by uninformed comment. snide lawyers could protest that their spiv clients can't get a fair trial...

IT SENT TO SOON. IT'S DARK AND I HAVE A SHITE COLD. KNACKERED.... Doing my best, here...

Aye, excellent.... but inaccurate. Sorry DOP... He's imagining that the polis will find someone whom he loathes to be awfy guilty and will not only PROVE that to be true but will then somehow go way beyond their powers and transfer ownership of potentially ill-gotten goods to yet another party. it disnae work as easily as we might all wish... .The ASSETS may be proceeds of crime but who is johnjames to assign who is best placed for the restitution of those proceeds?

ffs psOFF TOPIC LONG interview - 20 minutes? on the PM programme this evening with David Millar about biking and the drugs SCANDALS/culture. VERY good. STARTING ABOUT 40 MINUTES INTO THE PROG IF YOU GO LISTEN TO IPLAYER.... http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06twbz8 ETA: 41M 15 SECONDS-ISH

I don't think I'm a Ror - and I dunno wot a Mir might be... Plus she's neither shiny nor bald.

As you were only a day auld, I could have easily done so.