Slarti
-
Posts
3,453 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
17
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Slarti
-
-
I'm talking pish, they're ninth - I was looking at the April ones.Just checked - they actually went all the way down ... to 7th. -
Just checked - they actually went all the way down ... to 7th.Did Italy not move up the FIFA rankings this week? -
Did Italy not move up the FIFA rankings this week?Can't wait for the draw tomorrow night.
Worst draw for me...............
Portugal, Turkey and, rather obviously, Italy although they aren't in pot 4 for nothing.
Best draw for me.............
Germany, Romania and any of the play off winners.
Whatever it brings looking forward to a great summer of football. -
The most surprising one to me is that @Faraway Saint and[mention=15031]antrin[/mention] are the same person. [emoji16]Hey!
1. I’m good looking.
2. I’m not thick.
3. I can spell.
4. I’m a good guy.
QED
ETA I go to watch St Mirren.
1 No your not.
2 Oh, you are. You've been interacting with his alias and liking his posts. [emoji1782]
3 So can I.
4 You're a wank.
ETA I go to see St Mirren more than you, but I'm not a super supporter. [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]It's wonderful for you to show how shit you really are!!!
As you won’t understand your stupidity…
….in 1. That should have been “you’re” not “your”…. Thus you CAN’T spell.
i hope this helps you cringe even more. [emoji4]
Is that all you've got? [emoji204]
The difference between "your" and "you're" isn't a spelling mistake. [emoji1782]
Back to being pals with shull's alias. [emoji1787]Oh my..............i suppose being a sad lonely spermless prat is enough for you.
It's a grammar issue, and that's the mistake. I did spell "your" correctly. Here to help.
You're, see got it this time, so bitter, angry and desperate that you're the only person who can't see his alias.
Oh, you're wrong about my previous use of an alias as I commented on a post of yours some time ago and you "liked" it.
See, you're nowhere as smart as you think you are.
Smug and arrogant, yes, but not smart.
More of a buffoon.
See what I mean, it's hard to believe that they're the same person, but they are.
-
One bite ...Hey!
1. I’m good looking.
2. I’m not thick.
3. I can spell.
4. I’m a good guy.
QED
-
I really don't see what he gets out of denying it. Everybody knows but he keeps denying it. The same way he did when Percy Veer, Shetland, etc, etc, etc. Then he crys when@div deletes those aliases.I did wonder what that smell was, what was it he called me or Cockles1987, a coward.
Shull just [emoji90] it big time. [emoji1787]
Why have a different alias at all when you just act the same way as your usual one. Having a second alias would allow you to act differently, wind up different folk, give weird and wonderful opinions (like I do as @Cookie Monstor - or is @Cookie Monstor me).
The most surprising one to me is that @Faraway Saint and@antrin are the same person. [emoji16] -
But it's not really. [emoji16]I get your point, however as Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Christ whatever your opinion on the belief system behind it, then Hark The Herald Angels is a quintisential Christmas song. -
I think you clearly need lessons in reading and understanding English as I never admitted to being Shull. Why should I admit to being Shull when I'm not? You see, unlike you, I'm not a liar.
Feel free to put me "on ignore", the way you claim you have done with Bazil, if I offend you so much. You'd be doing yourself and the forum a great favour.
You mentioned Stuart Dickson, I don't know him and have never met him but he regularly made you look like a right fool on here. Of course, as we all know, that's not very difficult.
But you did, indirectly.
Whatever, shull.
You don't offend me, but I do get fed up laughing at you.
Dickson never made me look like anything as I wasn't on here when he was, I've just been told stuff. -
The bit in bold: this proves you are a liar as we all know you have been on here with those other names. You haven't altered your style of posting one bit.
The bit in italics: this is true (I think) so that's probably the only thing you've told the truth about on here.
The bit underlined: Yes, I'm guessing you were told this by the moderator when he banned you.
You really must try harder, Slartibartfast/Sluttybuttfest/Slarti whatever nom de plume you wish to use.
Who is this "we"? There's not really more than one of you. You do know this, right? Multiple aliases does not make you multiple people.
No, I haven't altered my style, as I am me, not them. Why would I alter my style to be like someone else?
So that's you admitting that you're shull then? Good for you.
I've never been banned, so I wasn't told anything by a moderator. -
They weren't me, I've explained that to one of your other aliases before. Even if they were, they didn't exist at the same time, so it wouldn't be the same thing. Even bringing that up again is basically just admitting who you are - I told you that you weren't any good at pretending not to be you.Is that what happened to your previous aliases of "Slartibartfast" and "Sluttybuttfest" as well as Cookie Monster's "Cockles1987" alias?
Those in glass houses and all that...
Anyway, you're only the "play thing" of Bazil.
I believe I was told that Slartibartfast was deleted due to one of Dickson's aliases going crying to Div like a little bitch. As for the other, I have no idea. -
I'll give you Arthur Christmas but not Hark The Herald Angels, as that is about the (supposed) birth of Jesus which, even if true, didn't happen in December. Just sayin', like.Indeed, unlike the fabulous Arthur Christmas or Hark the herald angels, had the debate loads and it is funny how intransigent people get, hope in mentioning it one of our other posters doesn't have a strong opinion [emoji849] -
You know, I don't even know what you get out of all this shit. You're no good at pretending not to be you. Nobody believes you're not you - apart from the other yous. All you are doing is wasting your time creating other aliases and logging in and out. Or maybe you're logged in with different accounts on different browsers at the same time. If I was Div, I would delete the oldest, or most used, accounts of people who have more than 2, not the newest ones.Triggered again. It's not even difficult with the two above. -
I suppose it depends on each person's own definition of a Xmas song (or film). To me, they're both just set at Xmas. Same as Home Alone. You could set them all at different times of year without changing the stories (except for the weather).I ask because some people claim it is a Christmas song but then say Die Hard isn't a Christmas film. -
FFS shull, gie it up.As I posted in reply to "your friend" in Albania previously, I can tell when people are upset and "rattled" as you like to put it. It's when they accuse me of "being" Shull. It actually gives me a good laugh to be honest. Laughing at you and your deluded thoughts!
Anyway, is that all you've got to contribute? No "jolly japes" about people suffering from serious illness?
-
Well the ones that urnae alive, urnae auld. They might huv bin auld, but urnae any mare.Only the ones that are still alive.
-
Warch out, [mention=17013]BigYardsAndBasher[/mention] (shull) and tantrum (antrin) will be after you for ageist shite.
As for me, I don't give a fcuk, everybody, if you're lucky, gets auld.
That's what all the auld farts say. [emoji16] -
Aye, horse drawn trams - them were the days, at least that's what that auld fart Faraway tells me.So are we all agreed that the road planning department are not fit for purpose?
Bring back the good auld days of trams, plenty of buses and being able to drive up the high street!
-
20 minutes ago, faraway saint said:
Wasting your time.
He's a crackpot.
So is his alias funny enough. 🤣
Is it "alias" or "a-liar"?
I'm not replying for his benefit but because unanswered falsehoods can suddenly become "the truth" to many. You know, falsehoods like "Rangers are alive".
-
36 minutes ago, shull said:
That'll be the same Judith Curry that has published research confirming anthropogenic effects on climate. Basically, all that she is saying is that the climate is warming slower than projected and that there is so much uncertainty about natural climate variation that trying to reduce emissions may be pointless. Note the "may be" in there, not "is".
Why don't we take a chance, pump out as much emissions as we can and just see what happens, eh?
-
1 hour ago, Cookie Monster said:
Does that mean that you can't turn into Christie Street from Glasgow Road? If so, and seeing that you won't be able to turn left into Mill Street, traffic coming from the east on Glasgow Road going to the Lagoon will have to go round Cotton Street to Mill Street and back along or down Kilnside to Seedhill to Mill Street (or maybe even round the one-way system and back - or Incle-Lawn-Silk-Gauze-Mill) which will result in more traffic turning right across Mill Street to the Lagoon, causing more tailbacks and potential accidents.
f**king mental.
-
42 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said:
So cars going from Cotton Street and turning right towards Glasgow Road now have to deal with a give way rather than having a set of lights. Or they need to turn left and go right round the roundabout. There's also going to be mayhem with cars trying to turn left into Cotton Street and buses going straight on from the bus lane to the roundabout.
Pedestrian crossings, that are not part of an integrated traffic light system, immediately off of two of the exits from the roundabout are just going to cause tailbacks onto the roundabout.
I don't think this has really been thought through very well.
-
11 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said:
Kant.
Och, ye kan.
-
14 minutes ago, HSS said:
I’d imagine the inside lane will be the bus/taxi lane so no left turn across it?
Yeah, that's what it says, but my point was really about the knock-on effects of that.
-
30 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said:
That was me being mellow, I'm not allowed to post what I really think of liars and trolls.
Just call them cunts, you know you want to.
Scotland Football Club
in Other Football
Posted