Jump to content

Slarti

Saints
  • Posts

    3,453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Posts posted by Slarti

  1. No, you never understand that people can  perceive your wandering posts differently from you, which you then see the need to turn into a 48 post revolving door based on the odd word, comma or question mark.
    As with Bazil, this is the 3rd and last post, we're done. 
    There was absolutely nothing wandering about it. How you perceive it is your issue. As I said, just try reading the words that are written. Can point out how it can, realistically, be taken the way you have taken it, given the words written and the post it was in reply to?
  2. What's the difference between a footballer and a member of the public?
    Are you seriously suggesting we close down/isolate anybody who has been in contact, close or has Covid forever? 
    Goodbye life if that's the case..........................oh, and we should add in the flu as it kills plenty of people every year.
    FFS, snowflake society. 
    Absolutely nothing, and if you read my post properly you would realise I wasn't saying there was, I was pointing out what the likely (over) reaction would be. In light of this, I'll just ignore the rest of your post.
  3. Covid is here to stay. it's time we stopped over reacting and get on with things.
    How long are we going to be jumping up and down every time someone get's a positive test, never mind any symptoms? 
     
     
    Aye, but if the rules were "relaxed" for professional fitba', you know it would only take one player to get seriously ill/die from it and they would probably stop all fitba'.
  4. Looks like our wage structure has fallen behind the competition. Hibs can obviously pay more than Saints but it certainly doesn't help with Ross watching Goodwin's every move.
    I wonder if there's a player named Covid that Jack will now try to sign.
  5. 11 minutes ago, Slash said:

    They do say common sense is not very common.

    What happens at your factory when someone dies as a result of failing to adhere to a routine maintenance schedule?

    The club have a duty of care to ensure that emergency lighting and stadium safety always meets requirements.

    The undersoil heating issue was also a result of an approach “only fix it when it breaks”.

    Maybe I’m old school, but I I check my boiler and pipes on a regular basis and get an annual safety check carried out by a registered engineer. Same goes with my car. I check tyres, oil, brakes, lights etc on regular basis and but also make sure it is serviced according to the manufacturer maintenance schedule. Do you just drive your car until if breaks down? Do you not bother getting your heating checked out by a professional on a regular basis?

    There is no getting away from the fact that St Mirren FC Ltd have failed to do so in the areas highlighted. 

    Have “historical  stadium” issues resulted in lower capacity issues thereby impacting our customer base!

    Seems strange talking about "historical stadium" issues for a stadium that is younger than my dog. :lol:

     



  6. Sorry Dad your opinion matters more to me than anyone else. Thanks again for correcting me master of knowledge. That’s just my opinion and not a fact. Hope everone understands.. 
    No wonder this forum is dead on its feet. Bully tactics from you and your various pompous aliases over the years. Sorry my opinion again.
    [emoji56]


    Bully tactics? Where? Various aliases? What were they?

    Give it up ffs , you were never very good at this in the first place (running away greetin about silly nicknames etc) and age hasn't improved you.

    And if I WAS your dad you wouldn't have got away with the treatment you dished out to your dad.
  7. It was all of the above. It was a badly worded opinion. Happy now. 
    In my humble opinion the club are playing  a blinder, pats on the back all round guys.
    I’m sure it will be proven that we have the best one man band of companies that do facilities management, builder works and security. If there is another one maybe they can do catering also. It will be like the Waltons. Can wait pieces in sugar at half time.
    Goodnight JB
    You could have saved us both some time if you had either clarified that it was an opinion when challenged or, even better, been more precise in you original wording.

    Happy has nothing to do with it, it's about facts. If you had something to back up your post then I would have been interested.

    You're entitled to your opinion, just like everyone else is. Not all opinions carry the same weight, though.
  8. I provided an opinion.
    I leave the assertions to more intelligent people like you. I am humbled by your superiority on all matters debated on here. 
    Thanks Dad
    Nothing you said even insinuated that it was an opinion, you asserted it. Just accept that you were either wrong or badly worded the post.
  9. Time will tell if they are up to the task. If not SMISA will be asked to bank role the clubs failure.
    Then we can debate the could should would. 
     
    Yeah, you've assumed something about an unknown, you could be right that they're not up to it ... though that doesn't change the fact that you were wrong to assert it without evidence.
  10. I only have the information that is available on the public forum that the said companies lodged and what other companies have lodged against them. Other than that i have nothing to back up my assertions. 
    I’m sorry i should have asked to read the lovely business plan, reviewed their woolly KYC policy, met with their third party funders and took their bank manager out for lunch. 
    Quack Quack !!
    Again, you said

    "A quick due diligence check would indicate that neither company has the relevant background or financial standing to undertake the duties they have been asked to do."

    You never said

    "A quick check on companies house website would possibly raise some red flags about the abilities of these companies to undertake the duties they have been asked to do."

    Totally different.

    You never did anything like "due diligence" (quick or otherwise), you looked at one website and came to the (biased) conclusion that these companies weren't up to the tasks.

    As usual, you're asserting things and then attempting to move the goalposts when asked to back up those assertions.
×
×
  • Create New...