Slarti

If I could choose just one of them to lose it would be - the agent.

Hmmm

Then you should just post links

Might cheer you up a bit. 😂 

You mean a spittal isn't messi enough?

If I could choose just one of them to lose it would be - the agent.

If I could choose just one of them to lose it would be - the agent.

If I could choose just one of them to lose it would be - the agent.

If I could choose just one of them to lose it would be - the agent.

The Maunder Minimum - being the lack of sun spots (and having a minimal contribution to the mini ice age) - ended in 1715. More sun spots (as we've had since then), in combination with a depleted ozone layer (caused by CFCs etc), would allow more UV through and potentially cause more warming.

Everything's linked, no effect (positive or negative) stands alone.

If man made climate change is not real it still does no harm to the planet to act as if it is. If it is real and we act as if it isn't, then we have potentially f**ked up the planet (at least short-term (geologicaly)), f**ked ourselves and also many other living organisms.

Why look after your house if you're not going to look after your street, your neighbourhood, your town, etc? It's all linked, no man is an island, blah, blah blah.

How would you feel if a smoker blew smoke in your face and, when you complained, they said "I don't believe all that science stuff that says it's bad"?

Anyway, enough of this.

I would question all newspapers and how they report. My family have a working history within the newspaper industry going back about 100 years. Negative scare stories sell more than positive things. The stats back that up by a considerable margin. 
I worked alongside some really clever scientists who worked in weather forecasting and specifically climate change. They were renowned throughout the world.
I spent many hours in their company and reading their work. Often what they wrote was completely misrepresented by MSM due to poor journalism. Click bait existed back in the 90s too. It’s not something new. Goes back to when printed stories first began. 
I certainly will not believe one word from newspapers such as the Sun and the Daily Mail. Same goes for the BBC and other mainstream media like the Guardian and the Independent. 
I’ve been down this path with you before. Next you will tell me the bible is a true story too! 
Anyone have a mobile number for Noah? We might be needing him sooner than we think. 😂 

A link would have been helpful in that case. You originally never mentioned the (missing) headline, just mentioned "warmest January" as if it was your opinion on what you had posted (i.e. the screenshot).

You never posted the headline.

Apparently the other end of the loop was connected at St James, though.

http://railway.paisleyhistory.uk/
Aye.

Just a shame no one had the bright idea to build a railway spur to the airport. 😂 

I got on quicker with my pensioner’s pass…

I must have read more of that than you - 1 minute too late, so I "missed the train". Damn you. [emoji16]

I don't see anything about "the warmest January on record". You're sounding a bit "climate change denier" there.

Let's keep him away from his agent until Thursday.

It's probably more to do with it getting lost because some numpty starts the threads 2 years before the game to make sure he gets to do it.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/26/e-jean-carroll-damages-trump-defamation-trial

Oh dear, how sad ... nah, no' really. [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/26/e-jean-carroll-damages-trump-defamation-trial

Oh dear, how sad ... nah, no' really. [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/26/e-jean-carroll-damages-trump-defamation-trial

Oh dear, how sad ... nah, no' really. [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

Welcome to Paisley Jayden. Best of luck for the rest of the season.

Sent from my SM-S906B using Tapatalk

Signs on loan for the rest of the season to replace Thierry Small.