madball
-
Posts
475 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
madball got a reaction from Smithers Jones in Speculation Thread
His contract will be end of June same as almost all contracts, which is why he was with us in Belfast. After it expires he would leave the club, but if he signs for another Scottish club, as his next club, at any point in the future up to age 23 we would get compensation regardless.
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from waldorf34 in Speculation Thread
Kyle Turner left Thistle. Looked ok in playoff games, but apparently was hot and cold through the season according to some Thistle fans. Wouldn't be a starter but maybe a squad player. Sentimentality would play a part in it being Tommy's son
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
-
madball got a reaction from Cookie Monster in Speculation Thread
Stuart McKinstry released by Leeds. Was on loan at Motherwell last season, but was at Motherwell as a youth at the same time as Robinson was manager. Pacey which we need. No rumour, just speculating
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from saint in exile in Baccus
Said this elsewhere, but Erhahon leaving diminished what Baccus offered to the team
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
-
madball got a reaction from Mainstand Sweary Mob in Baccus
Said this elsewhere, but Erhahon leaving diminished what Baccus offered to the team
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
-
madball got a reaction from Mainstand Sweary Mob in Sts v Aberdeen Christmas Eve
Erhahon was unfairly booked in first half and after that the dons were trying to wind him up. He did bite a bit though and checked one of their players off the ball. Was for his own protection and in our interest keeping 11 on field
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from portmahomack saint in Sts v Aberdeen Christmas Eve
Erhahon was unfairly booked in first half and after that the dons were trying to wind him up. He did bite a bit though and checked one of their players off the ball. Was for his own protection and in our interest keeping 11 on field
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from santaponsasaint in Sts v Aberdeen Christmas Eve
Erhahon was unfairly booked in first half and after that the dons were trying to wind him up. He did bite a bit though and checked one of their players off the ball. Was for his own protection and in our interest keeping 11 on field
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from waldorf34 in Sts v Aberdeen Christmas Eve
Erhahon was unfairly booked in first half and after that the dons were trying to wind him up. He did bite a bit though and checked one of their players off the ball. Was for his own protection and in our interest keeping 11 on field
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from Rascal in Scottish Football Kits - Away Kit of the Year Vote
Currently we are trailing the sheep in the vote in the final for Away Kit of the Year. Get voting troops
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from W6er in Scottish Football Kits - Away Kit of the Year Vote
Currently we are trailing the sheep in the vote in the final for Away Kit of the Year. Get voting troops
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from ALBIONSAINT in Scottish Football Kits - Away Kit of the Year Vote
Currently we are trailing the sheep in the vote in the final for Away Kit of the Year. Get voting troops
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from faraway saint in Scottish Football Kits - Away Kit of the Year Vote
Currently we are trailing the sheep in the vote in the final for Away Kit of the Year. Get voting troops
Sent from my 2107113SG using Tapatalk
-
madball got a reaction from Rascal in The Legend Conor Newton
I actually thought he'd go on and have a better career than Dummett. Better all round footballer. Perhaps his 2nd spell here might have been better served at a lower league club down south to give him variety and aid development. -
madball reacted to turrabuddie in Jack Copland
Agree.
Wish he was still involved with the club in some capacity. -
madball got a reaction from faraway saint in John McGinn
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/john-mcginn-transfer-details-revealed-18625595
-
madball got a reaction from St.Ricky in Squad Additions
Sean Kelly released by County. Option for left back?
-
madball got a reaction from whydowebother in Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)
After much deliberating I've decided to vote no. A lot of what Kibble would bring to the table is commendable and would certainly help in aspects of the club, however concerning is the fact that this has been carved up without looking at other ways to get members more actively involved and also the structure of the deal.
I've been on other committees and always found that when the consequences of non-activity were laid out then people understood and came forward. I'll hold my hands up and say that I didn't come forward last twice as my other activities elsewhere wouldn't have meant that I had spare capacity to do anything. It seems underhand to have progressed as far as they have with the proposed deal without advising members we were considering looking for alternative options to the 71% model and also not to present any case around alternatives (ie other charities / organisations approached).
On the structure of the deal I'm not comfortable with what has been stated regarding number of seats and potential veto. The ability for material decisions, which may be in the financial best interests of the club, but at odds with the direction of Kibble, to be vetoed is not what I'd want from the board. The board have talked previously about putting financial sense ahead of the wishes of fans (Old Firm in Family Stand), but are now recommending a deal where shackles will be put on the ability to make directional decisions that could be profound for financial well-being.
-
madball got a reaction from Buddymarvellous in Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)
After much deliberating I've decided to vote no. A lot of what Kibble would bring to the table is commendable and would certainly help in aspects of the club, however concerning is the fact that this has been carved up without looking at other ways to get members more actively involved and also the structure of the deal.
I've been on other committees and always found that when the consequences of non-activity were laid out then people understood and came forward. I'll hold my hands up and say that I didn't come forward last twice as my other activities elsewhere wouldn't have meant that I had spare capacity to do anything. It seems underhand to have progressed as far as they have with the proposed deal without advising members we were considering looking for alternative options to the 71% model and also not to present any case around alternatives (ie other charities / organisations approached).
On the structure of the deal I'm not comfortable with what has been stated regarding number of seats and potential veto. The ability for material decisions, which may be in the financial best interests of the club, but at odds with the direction of Kibble, to be vetoed is not what I'd want from the board. The board have talked previously about putting financial sense ahead of the wishes of fans (Old Firm in Family Stand), but are now recommending a deal where shackles will be put on the ability to make directional decisions that could be profound for financial well-being.
-
madball got a reaction from WeeBud in Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)
After much deliberating I've decided to vote no. A lot of what Kibble would bring to the table is commendable and would certainly help in aspects of the club, however concerning is the fact that this has been carved up without looking at other ways to get members more actively involved and also the structure of the deal.
I've been on other committees and always found that when the consequences of non-activity were laid out then people understood and came forward. I'll hold my hands up and say that I didn't come forward last twice as my other activities elsewhere wouldn't have meant that I had spare capacity to do anything. It seems underhand to have progressed as far as they have with the proposed deal without advising members we were considering looking for alternative options to the 71% model and also not to present any case around alternatives (ie other charities / organisations approached).
On the structure of the deal I'm not comfortable with what has been stated regarding number of seats and potential veto. The ability for material decisions, which may be in the financial best interests of the club, but at odds with the direction of Kibble, to be vetoed is not what I'd want from the board. The board have talked previously about putting financial sense ahead of the wishes of fans (Old Firm in Family Stand), but are now recommending a deal where shackles will be put on the ability to make directional decisions that could be profound for financial well-being.
-
madball got a reaction from Lord Pityme in Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)
After much deliberating I've decided to vote no. A lot of what Kibble would bring to the table is commendable and would certainly help in aspects of the club, however concerning is the fact that this has been carved up without looking at other ways to get members more actively involved and also the structure of the deal.
I've been on other committees and always found that when the consequences of non-activity were laid out then people understood and came forward. I'll hold my hands up and say that I didn't come forward last twice as my other activities elsewhere wouldn't have meant that I had spare capacity to do anything. It seems underhand to have progressed as far as they have with the proposed deal without advising members we were considering looking for alternative options to the 71% model and also not to present any case around alternatives (ie other charities / organisations approached).
On the structure of the deal I'm not comfortable with what has been stated regarding number of seats and potential veto. The ability for material decisions, which may be in the financial best interests of the club, but at odds with the direction of Kibble, to be vetoed is not what I'd want from the board. The board have talked previously about putting financial sense ahead of the wishes of fans (Old Firm in Family Stand), but are now recommending a deal where shackles will be put on the ability to make directional decisions that could be profound for financial well-being.
-
madball got a reaction from portmahomack saint in Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)
After much deliberating I've decided to vote no. A lot of what Kibble would bring to the table is commendable and would certainly help in aspects of the club, however concerning is the fact that this has been carved up without looking at other ways to get members more actively involved and also the structure of the deal.
I've been on other committees and always found that when the consequences of non-activity were laid out then people understood and came forward. I'll hold my hands up and say that I didn't come forward last twice as my other activities elsewhere wouldn't have meant that I had spare capacity to do anything. It seems underhand to have progressed as far as they have with the proposed deal without advising members we were considering looking for alternative options to the 71% model and also not to present any case around alternatives (ie other charities / organisations approached).
On the structure of the deal I'm not comfortable with what has been stated regarding number of seats and potential veto. The ability for material decisions, which may be in the financial best interests of the club, but at odds with the direction of Kibble, to be vetoed is not what I'd want from the board. The board have talked previously about putting financial sense ahead of the wishes of fans (Old Firm in Family Stand), but are now recommending a deal where shackles will be put on the ability to make directional decisions that could be profound for financial well-being.