spirit of 77

isnt it time you logged on as stuart dickson and started an argument with yourself?

isnt it time you logged on as stuart dickson and started an argument with yourself?

isnt it time you logged on as stuart dickson and started an argument with yourself?

I dont think that is true, it's a family-run firm in which he plays a role but is by no means the central figure

Touched a nerve or what?
Will you be changing your user name to something that covers all the aliases? Like vicious dicko perhaps?
The way the two of you seem to disagree but always seem to set each other up nicely for the next exchange certainly raises a few suspicions.
You can call me names on here all you like, the fact that i know you would never do it to my face speaks volumes of your self-styled rampaging wit.
If it wasn't so very predictable, i'd brace myself for the next barrage of petty insults and cheeky wee emoticons. However there is that thing known as real life to get on with.

Touched a nerve or what?
Will you be changing your user name to something that covers all the aliases? Like vicious dicko perhaps?
The way the two of you seem to disagree but always seem to set each other up nicely for the next exchange certainly raises a few suspicions.
You can call me names on here all you like, the fact that i know you would never do it to my face speaks volumes of your self-styled rampaging wit.
If it wasn't so very predictable, i'd brace myself for the next barrage of petty insults and cheeky wee emoticons. However there is that thing known as real life to get on with.

So time to name the sources of the tweets.
One of the most annoying things about politicians in the last 15 years has been the tendency to trail news more in hope than in expectation so that people think something is happenning when in fact excuses are being made
Do you think that 10000 hours are using the same tactics as the takeover juggernaut encounters some swampy terrain?

Oh, the irony, but I suppose you missed that
By your reasoning, if we have doubts about this project then we can only air them if we have absolute proof or an alternative strategy? What happened to the right to question? Surely it is up to the proposer of such a radical and hitherto untried (at this level) strategy to persuade the rest of us that he has the ability to make the whole thing hang together for the benefit of the club.
It seems to me that you can come up with a grandiose vision to deliver your own pet project of social and religious ministry, persuade others to part with their hard-earned cash to finance it in the belief (not, I hasten to add, the knowledge) that it will benefit the club they love and then walk away without a financial scratch or any drain on your well-protected resources when it all falls apart. Tell me how that is fair or how it is liable to fill enough people with the confidence to support it?
Anyway, in all seriousness, are you gonnae make me shut the f**k up?

You know this for a fact? I would think schools would have a job distributing tickets while all the staff are on holiday>

This place is turning into dickophile heaven
Interesting though that Dicko should brandish his "I employ 400 peope " credentials as a way of impressing the natives and then seeks to portray himself as just another director when there are signs that the popular belief is that he has day to day control of the company.
Is it true that Maxi has a charge over St Mirren Football Club just now? If so, what is the exact purpose?
Have some of the loans and grants materialised already? If so, has any of that money been spent? If it has been spent then where has it gone?
Are payments already due on any loans? If so, have they all been met?
Can he not lend some of his own money to the CIC? there surely must be a way to do that without getting hit by the tax charges he mentioned at the public meetings.
Will the pitch be used as grazing or a paddock by his horsey friends?
Why ask for direct debit details when there are so many issues over share ownership to be overcome?
Some people are suggesting that the ultimate motive is for someone to get everyone else to pay for their do-gooder visions of a CIC that also happens to control a football club-not a lot is being done to dispel that notion now and the dwindling group of hangers-on who try to defend the CIC by attacking all who question it are now looking more and more like a bunch of wannabes that dream of a seat on the board and of pee-heeing with the allegedly rich and powerful of the parish (sic).
And finally, ktf. Do you fancy coming round the Tile to discuss "rancid little hovels" with myself, buddiecat, scottd and quite a few others who have serious doubts over 10000 hours intentions and ability to deliver? Or are you just another internet blowhard?

This place is turning into dickophile heaven
Interesting though that Dicko should brandish his "I employ 400 peope " credentials as a way of impressing the natives and then seeks to portray himself as just another director when there are signs that the popular belief is that he has day to day control of the company.
Is it true that Maxi has a charge over St Mirren Football Club just now? If so, what is the exact purpose?
Have some of the loans and grants materialised already? If so, has any of that money been spent? If it has been spent then where has it gone?
Are payments already due on any loans? If so, have they all been met?
Can he not lend some of his own money to the CIC? there surely must be a way to do that without getting hit by the tax charges he mentioned at the public meetings.
Will the pitch be used as grazing or a paddock by his horsey friends?
Why ask for direct debit details when there are so many issues over share ownership to be overcome?
Some people are suggesting that the ultimate motive is for someone to get everyone else to pay for their do-gooder visions of a CIC that also happens to control a football club-not a lot is being done to dispel that notion now and the dwindling group of hangers-on who try to defend the CIC by attacking all who question it are now looking more and more like a bunch of wannabes that dream of a seat on the board and of pee-heeing with the allegedly rich and powerful of the parish (sic).
And finally, ktf. Do you fancy coming round the Tile to discuss "rancid little hovels" with myself, buddiecat, scottd and quite a few others who have serious doubts over 10000 hours intentions and ability to deliver? Or are you just another internet blowhard?

Oh, the irony, but I suppose you missed that
By your reasoning, if we have doubts about this project then we can only air them if we have absolute proof or an alternative strategy? What happened to the right to question? Surely it is up to the proposer of such a radical and hitherto untried (at this level) strategy to persuade the rest of us that he has the ability to make the whole thing hang together for the benefit of the club.
It seems to me that you can come up with a grandiose vision to deliver your own pet project of social and religious ministry, persuade others to part with their hard-earned cash to finance it in the belief (not, I hasten to add, the knowledge) that it will benefit the club they love and then walk away without a financial scratch or any drain on your well-protected resources when it all falls apart. Tell me how that is fair or how it is liable to fill enough people with the confidence to support it?
Anyway, in all seriousness, are you gonnae make me shut the f**k up?

So you have no problem with people posting the inflamatory pish that Sonny is guilty of, but have a problem when I take offence and stand up for myself, friends and family members.
Or in otherwords
Pro CIC-say what you want and have at any detractors with everything you have-no holds are barred
CIC sceptics-watch yourselves, we cant have you rocking the boat and spoling our love-in.

You know this for a fact? I would think schools would have a job distributing tickets while all the staff are on holiday>

This place is turning into dickophile heaven
Interesting though that Dicko should brandish his "I employ 400 peope " credentials as a way of impressing the natives and then seeks to portray himself as just another director when there are signs that the popular belief is that he has day to day control of the company.
Is it true that Maxi has a charge over St Mirren Football Club just now? If so, what is the exact purpose?
Have some of the loans and grants materialised already? If so, has any of that money been spent? If it has been spent then where has it gone?
Are payments already due on any loans? If so, have they all been met?
Can he not lend some of his own money to the CIC? there surely must be a way to do that without getting hit by the tax charges he mentioned at the public meetings.
Will the pitch be used as grazing or a paddock by his horsey friends?
Why ask for direct debit details when there are so many issues over share ownership to be overcome?
Some people are suggesting that the ultimate motive is for someone to get everyone else to pay for their do-gooder visions of a CIC that also happens to control a football club-not a lot is being done to dispel that notion now and the dwindling group of hangers-on who try to defend the CIC by attacking all who question it are now looking more and more like a bunch of wannabes that dream of a seat on the board and of pee-heeing with the allegedly rich and powerful of the parish (sic).
And finally, ktf. Do you fancy coming round the Tile to discuss "rancid little hovels" with myself, buddiecat, scottd and quite a few others who have serious doubts over 10000 hours intentions and ability to deliver? Or are you just another internet blowhard?

You know this for a fact? I would think schools would have a job distributing tickets while all the staff are on holiday>

I was merely replying in kind and echoing the original posters infammatory and confrontational writing style.
You want some as well?

Oh, the irony, but I suppose you missed that
By your reasoning, if we have doubts about this project then we can only air them if we have absolute proof or an alternative strategy? What happened to the right to question? Surely it is up to the proposer of such a radical and hitherto untried (at this level) strategy to persuade the rest of us that he has the ability to make the whole thing hang together for the benefit of the club.
It seems to me that you can come up with a grandiose vision to deliver your own pet project of social and religious ministry, persuade others to part with their hard-earned cash to finance it in the belief (not, I hasten to add, the knowledge) that it will benefit the club they love and then walk away without a financial scratch or any drain on your well-protected resources when it all falls apart. Tell me how that is fair or how it is liable to fill enough people with the confidence to support it?
Anyway, in all seriousness, are you gonnae make me shut the f**k up?

This place is turning into dickophile heaven
Interesting though that Dicko should brandish his "I employ 400 peope " credentials as a way of impressing the natives and then seeks to portray himself as just another director when there are signs that the popular belief is that he has day to day control of the company.
Is it true that Maxi has a charge over St Mirren Football Club just now? If so, what is the exact purpose?
Have some of the loans and grants materialised already? If so, has any of that money been spent? If it has been spent then where has it gone?
Are payments already due on any loans? If so, have they all been met?
Can he not lend some of his own money to the CIC? there surely must be a way to do that without getting hit by the tax charges he mentioned at the public meetings.
Will the pitch be used as grazing or a paddock by his horsey friends?
Why ask for direct debit details when there are so many issues over share ownership to be overcome?
Some people are suggesting that the ultimate motive is for someone to get everyone else to pay for their do-gooder visions of a CIC that also happens to control a football club-not a lot is being done to dispel that notion now and the dwindling group of hangers-on who try to defend the CIC by attacking all who question it are now looking more and more like a bunch of wannabes that dream of a seat on the board and of pee-heeing with the allegedly rich and powerful of the parish (sic).
And finally, ktf. Do you fancy coming round the Tile to discuss "rancid little hovels" with myself, buddiecat, scottd and quite a few others who have serious doubts over 10000 hours intentions and ability to deliver? Or are you just another internet blowhard?

Oh, the irony, but I suppose you missed that
By your reasoning, if we have doubts about this project then we can only air them if we have absolute proof or an alternative strategy? What happened to the right to question? Surely it is up to the proposer of such a radical and hitherto untried (at this level) strategy to persuade the rest of us that he has the ability to make the whole thing hang together for the benefit of the club.
It seems to me that you can come up with a grandiose vision to deliver your own pet project of social and religious ministry, persuade others to part with their hard-earned cash to finance it in the belief (not, I hasten to add, the knowledge) that it will benefit the club they love and then walk away without a financial scratch or any drain on your well-protected resources when it all falls apart. Tell me how that is fair or how it is liable to fill enough people with the confidence to support it?
Anyway, in all seriousness, are you gonnae make me shut the f**k up?

He doesnt know, he is a cock and he gets a kick from people like you engaging with him

He doesnt know, he is a cock and he gets a kick from people like you engaging with him

He doesnt know, he is a cock and he gets a kick from people like you engaging with him

Take the huff? You launched a bitter and personal attack on Fraz using innuendo and unsubstantiated allegations. However you clearly think that is funny.
Nobody has done more fo disharmony and in-fighting on this board than you

Take the huff? You launched a bitter and personal attack on Fraz using innuendo and unsubstantiated allegations. However you clearly think that is funny.
Nobody has done more fo disharmony and in-fighting on this board than you