Alanb
You will see that the Rules are not that easy to amend.
The original Rules stated: -
"In the case of this Rule, Rule 6 and Rule 106 the quorum at any general meeting called to consider a resolution to amend shall be: -
1. not less than one half of the members entitled to vote at the meeting if the Society has up to 200 members when the meeting is called;
2. not less than one third of the members entitled to vote at the meeting if the Society has more than 200 but less than 1000 members when the meeting is called; and
3. not less than one quarter of the members entitled to vote at the meeting if the Society has more than 1000 members when the meeting is called."
At the AGM to agree to the amendments, there would need to have been more than 250 members to ensure a quorum and 2/3's of those members would need to have positively voted for the resolution to be passed.
I'm pretty sure there will never have been more than 250 members at an AGM, so how the amendments could have been voted through, who knows. Also, at the back of the new Rules, there is a Statutory Declaration that the amendments are in the manner provided for in the Rules, which they are not. If the signatories to the updated Rules are happy to be consciously misleading about something rather trivial, where next?