Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Days Won


Everything posted by saintnextlifetime

  1. . .as 39,000 Western Australians get 'fired' there is a wee protest at the parliament. .
  2. https://t.me/Freedom_Warriors/23611 https://hugotalks.com/2021/11/26/broken-heart-hugo-talks-lockdown/
  3. Ocht , that's a wee shame . .as long as he dusnae get upset by lies and hypocrisy , that's the main thing. .
  4. " I never argue with an idiot . They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience ."
  5. Saw an interesting survey done the other day that said 34% of people in the UK trust the BBC . . . .of course , if we extrapolate that result , it would mean that 66% of the UK population do not trust the BBC . . . .then again if we extrapolate that result a wee bit more , two thirds of the UK population think the national broadcaster are lying baisturts. . We also learned not that long ago what the BBC condone happening to young people , on their very premises even.
  6. Of course , that is before we get to amount of laws forcing someone to get "vaccinated* violates .
  7. Indeed, Dr Whitless , said back in April there would not be another Lockdown - mentioning too much disruption to peoples lives and too many suicides . It looks like the plan now is that we just don't get out of the one we are still in , ever .
  8. Sounds like you answered your own question.
  9. "I never argue with an idiot . They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. "
  10. Thanks for that update EAB. Is it the unlicensed , untested , emergency use only vaccines that you are promoting?
  11. "I never argue with an idiot . They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. "
  12. The Nuremberg Code (1947) Permissible Medical Experiments The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
  13. It dusnae take a genius to work out that you have been at the swally. .
  14. https://meaww.com/angus-dalgleish-birger-sorensen-china-create-covid-19-wuhan-lab-reverse-engineer
  15. I don't drink but l do have a very strong suspicion that you do . Maybe gaslighting works for you . . The truth is the truth and if you decide to live with lies , that is your concern not mine. You are free to fantasize............
  16. Seems like Mr Gates has been hanging out with a kiddie fiddler . Strange , he seemed like such a nice guy.
  • Create New...