saintnextlifetime

Sid - I cannae be arsed anymore. Your ability to warp and twist is astonishing. Let's just avoid each other.

Fras, you will find that sending a PM to a stranger via a public forum is just as public as if you had post it in the open forum. As for the thirdy party veiled threats - very poor show. Dunno what are thinking about of late.
If someone has threatened me in an email to you then you should forward me the details by PM and I will deal with it.
It's certainly just a game to me Fras. I take my kids to the games on a Saturday and post on here. That is my involvement with St Mirren. I am in no way precious about how I support the club and have no desire to undermine anyone that works for the club irrespective of my personal view of them.
At no point would my view on a game, a manager or who owns or doesn't own the club lead me to threaten violence. Would you care to point out the post that has warranted threatening behaviour?
I offered to join you for a Blackburn Bolton derby in the past and that offer still stands. I think you need to get over your "reputation" and take a step back from all the politics of the club. You clearly cannae handle it.
As for my address - it is hardly a secret. I stay just down the road from the Windae Cleaner as has been posted on here many times not to mention me being on STV furfuxake. Where I sit in the stadium has been posted many times as has been the fact that I walk back to my in-laws just round the corner of the stadium.
Is this really where your head is now? Yul and the magnificent seven are ready to storm Hillview Road to silence an Internet alias that is supportive of the CIC.

Shouldn't the topic title end with "?"? Or have I missed the confirmation?

WTF dae you know about 'making sense'!

Sorry to hear you're banned lawfud. As much as you can be tedious I have never seen anything worthy of a ban. I can barely remember why I got banned from the fishal site - it was round about when TH's jacket was on a shakey peg. Can't remember the detail but I think Bill Lees got bagged at the same time. The moderators here have it spot on. There's been loads of jumpy up and doon outraged moderator wannabees trying to dictate who can and can't post since the site began. Thankfully the mods have ignored them. They usually storm off in the huff for a while and then reappear harbouring the same petty grudges. We all get a hard time now and then, but no one takes it seriously. You can always spot the ones that will breech as their online / offline persona is a big deal for them. I would imagine their egos are as fragile offline as they are online. Nothing more than jumped up canteen monitors.

He doesnt know, he is a cock and he gets a kick from people like you engaging with him

Nice one Bud' , think I'll pop along with my Zombie-fan-mate on Nov19th . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH_nMjO38nI&feature=related

. .especially for Bongocorleoni. .

The daughter of the Sex Pistols drummer , apparently . A wee bit of Ska/Dub verging on Skinhead Reggae . .

If its not a real word it should be

Oh SPS, much more than a statement, almost Hitler'esk in proportion and drearydom (Is that a real word? )

I find most things funny especially moral outrage, no revelation there.
Fras sent the PM, Fras boasted about conspiring against a fellow St Mirren fan. I actually suggested he speak directly to the person about his issues / allegations. He wasn't prepared to do that. A real shame IMHO. A cracking guy making a few errors in judgement.
If you want to be a genuine friend to him, like I tried to be ask him about what he is up to and advise him he is making a mistake. It is up to him whether he shares what is really going on with you.
I have forwarded on one part of one PM to one other person and will do no more about it beyond that. It is certainly not a pleasant situation, but it is not one that I created.

Take the huff? You launched a bitter and personal attack on Fraz using innuendo and unsubstantiated allegations. However you clearly think that is funny.
Nobody has done more fo disharmony and in-fighting on this board than you

The Bold St Sid's more self-righteous posts do tend to bring out the gay fetishes of some posters.

gone

Overblown self-important nonsense.
Posts in the public arena are much better than malevolent whispering campaigns though. You should try it, much healthier and gives the consortium member you whisper bile about the opportunity to demand justifications, evidence, etc.
It is not up to me to justify anything. You have every opportunity in a public forum to counter the comments, a courtesy not given in a malevolent whispering campaign.
I am quite comfortable with my excuseness of manhood......you appear to be suffering some form of self-confidence crisis if a few friendly comments on an unoficial Internet forum can get you into such a tizzy. Surely you reputation could not be so easily sullied by a few comments on an Internet forum. But then he who lives by the......

I suggest you revisit your PM BigFras. It appears you like to give out series of false statements as though they are fact when it suits you, but don't like it right back at you.
I am quite happy in my opinion that you are disingenuous, sneaky, underhand and creepy, so whilst you post that you have changed your mind on what was previously a very strong anti-CIC opinion to pro, whilst continuing to chip away at it from your faux position of support I feel comfortable in my view that your credability as far as I am concerned is in the shitter. Remember you stated in your PM that you were running an online campaign against a consortium member.
Like your last couple of overblown post I actually find your behaviour quite funny as you should be able to discern from the tone of my posts. Don't let that detract from the "outraged in Bolton" tone of your posts though - they are comedy gold.

gone

this is my big concern, the shareholding is never worth that kind of money. it's not even worth the residue of debt once the grants are in place, and what happens if all of that money is not forthcoming?
I reckon that the concept of only 300 members required is very precarious. If we have two rotten seasons on the park how many will say "stuff it". Quite a feckin few in my opinion.
And as for the school of thought that says we will be in exactly the same position if the CIC fails as we are in now, let me just point out that an administrator will be mostly concerned with getting the best deal for the major creditors and wont care a jot about the character of any bidders once the colour of their money is seen.
If the intial investment was at the market rate then I'd say that would be around £500,000 well spent and where do i sign, but 1.2 mil? I just dont see it working.

id love carey back but mcgowan is shite
unless we tried him up front with thompson or as a cf behind thompson

hmm. i see your last resort is to personal insults. nice.
mcgowan will split our support some of our supporters will find a reason to like him. no idea why, is it because you are fooled by his first class circle running? or are you a c*ltic sympathiser?
paul mcgowan has been rubbish for us and not a patch on graham carey like it or lump it, dhrew.

At the risk of being repetitive, why not ask the question in the Q&A thread where you will have more chance of getting a sensible / correct answer.

I just text Richie's mobile and get a text straight back. It is all about how you ask the question - remamrkable how bad journo's are at asking questions seeing it is the main part of their job - much too much focus on making pish up these days and then waiting for a reaction.