civilsaint

What did he do wrong? Where was the rule breach?

Made what easy for the referee? What did Cheesy do wrong? The way some fans treat our own players is utterly disgraceful.

...but didn't cost us the points today.

There wasn't though.

What do you think he did wrong with his hands?

Those who have had the benefit of watch TV footage seem to completely disagree. What do you think Cheesy did?

No, wrong. This is the guy that said he didn't have a problem with eggs being thrown at him. "Part of politics" he said. Do keep up.

Murphy as Scottish leader gives me confidence, just hope the trade unions don't fcuk it up by backing Finlay, just as they fcuked it up in giving us Ed Milliband.

Good to see Murphy step up. He'll do a good job. As for him being right wing, that's just f**king mental.

A very dignified, moving and honest piece by Simon's brother in the Evening Times. RIP

Stewart Regan ‏@StewartMRegan 14s14 seconds ago Elite player development, driven off the back of strong talent ID is critical for Scottish success. We will therefore recruit a new Perf Dir

That certainly is not "clear".

Which then prompts you to look it up or discuss it with friends or even discuss it on a football forum. Great advertising strategy.

So, one can see the score on the scoreboard from the furthest viewing position. Looks like a job well done from SMFC.

Spot on Shull.

Will the naysayers change their minds? I should think so.

Like I said, an example of why fans shouldn't get too involved in running businesses.

^^ A demonstration of why fan involvement in business is rarely a good idea.

First mistake is that a "joiner" is the wrong trade for such a job. Secondly, it would cost £500 to print the adverts never mind build the structure. You'd be talking at least £20,000 for something like that (before even thinking of the screen cost).

Are people genuinely complaining about this or just fishing? I'm seriously confused. Another positive move by the club.

The board certainly isn't tiny.

We will be EU citizens as long as we are part of an EU member state. Scotland cannot apply from within (otherwise to point out the bleeding obvious there would be no need to apply). If we vote YES, Scotland will become independent in March 2016. Hugely overwhelming expert opinion tells us that Scotland will not be a member of the EU by this time. Therefore, Scotland's application will be complete from outside the EU.

If we vote to leave an EU member state we are voting to leave the EU. Only then can an application for membership be considered, an application from the outside. As for going round in circles, if you and our Bute buddy simply accepted your allegations were incorrect, this thread would be over. Instead you are happy to stand by the false allegations.

Junker's position is entirely clear. He has agreed with the President of the European Commission and the President of the European Council, who when asked specifically about Scotland said: "A new independent state would, by the fact of its independence, would become a third country with respect to the EU". "A new state, if it wants to join the European Union,has to apply to become a member of the EU, like any state." Juncker also added, "One does not become a member of the EU by sending a letter".

Show me evidence of Scotland being considered a "Nation" by the EU. The term "nation" is meaningless anyway in the EU context as you rightly point out. What matters is that Scotland is not a member state and never has been. Just as Catalonia never has been a member state, or Bavaria. Whilst you're at it have you still not been able to find the quotes where Better Together claim that Scotland wouldn't get into the EU? Will you accept your error?