Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by stlucifer

  1. Just now, Slarti said:

    Ok, point to where I said, or even insinuated, he was wrong. I've already said that I never said that, do keep up, ffs. More to the point, show me what I said that was wrong.

    Compared to a 36 game season, we haven't got a game to spare, we have played one more.

    What exactly is your point here, you just seem to have jumped in trying to start an argument. Are you fed up arguing with yourself?

    Where did Topcat say the number of games were the same? Christ. You're having a mare here mate. As I said at first outing. You were, at the very least, being pedantic. I'd quit while I was behind if I were you.

  2. 22 hours ago, Slarti said:



    What he did afterwards is totally irrelevant to my response to his post (shown below) where he only mentioned "points tally" and games "to spare".

    It's not really difficult to understand. He made specific points, I addressed only those points, so what is your issue with it?



    Are you suggesting we've had more than 44 points in any season Topcat mentioned?


    Best points tally in a top flight season since the 80’s emoji122.png  44. Any other season we've had this?
    With one game to spare! We have one more game to play. Correct. 


    I don't see anywhere in this statement where he was wrong.

  3. 1 minute ago, Slarti said:

    I'm being pedantic because I only addressed the EXACT points he mentioned??? By suggesting the theory he put out was flawed due to nothing being EXACTLY the same


    Nobody was talking about how we have developed or how to measure it, so why are you bringing that up?

    Why else do you think Topcat took the time to, firstly, suggest the team have done better results wise, then, when you challenged him on his figures because the seasons were different, took time to adjust for points variation and or season length, showing that that was still the case?

  4. Just now, Slarti said:
    27 minutes ago, stlucifer said:
    I'm with Topcat on this.  As far as I can see, in your opinion,  NO season can be compared to any other as there are many variables to consider. On this premise, no one should suggest we're better/worse/ the same as we were in previous years as it would depend on how good/bad/mediocre the opposition players/teams/coaches/pitches are. I think you're being a little pedantic.

    He was talking about points gained and games played (or, actually, games left to play) and that's what I pointed out the flaws in. The teams in the league, the players who are in those teams, the types of surface, the weather or anything else was irrelevant to the point he was making. I just addressed his points.

    Which is why I consider you're being pedantic. If you think judgements can indeed be made on how much we have developed, what would you gauge it on?

  5. 40 minutes ago, Slarti said:

    You mentioned "a game to spare" when, in reality, we have played a game more than some seasons.

    Also, my first reply to you said DIRECTLY COMPARABLE (see below), so what are you whinging about.

    Are you really saying that if you have to manipulate the data to get something directly comparable it means that the original data was directly comparable?

    I never disagreed that we have more points, I just pointed out the fallacy of using only points as a yardstick.


    I'm with Topcat on this.  As far as I can see, in your opinion,  NO season can be compared to any other as there are many variables to consider. On this premise, no one should suggest we're better/worse/ the same as we were in previous years as it would depend on how good/bad/mediocre the opposition players/teams/coaches/pitches are. I think you're being a little pedantic.

  6. I thought he showed flashes of what he brings to the table. His pace will always concern defences and if he gets the final ball right more often as he did last night that would be magnified. I agree with you on tracking back. I know he wasn't long on in the semi final when Middleton made his impact at the first goal but, if he had been closer to him, Fraser wouldn't have needed to move out of position and the cross may have been cut out. Does anyone have info if he has been told he wouldn't be offered a deal? This lad will get better.

  7. 6 minutes ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said:

    And to be fair Lucy I don’t think a single person is disputing that. Doesn’t mean some valid points haven’t been raised. 

    Feck knows who lucy is but, there are some who are suggesting it was, at least in part, down to the excuses given. So, what valid points? IF they were likely to have affected the result, they might have been relevant but they didn't. Saints had plenty of time to  score goals and prevent losing them through basic errors.

  8. We can go around the houses trying to blame Accies or the ref for our result but, at the end of the day, it comes down to the fact we weren't good enough to get a result. It really is that simple. Goodie picked the wrong team and those on the park were inept to say the least. Who actually thinks we would have scored another goal if we had another four minutes to play on? We had 93 minutes to do so. If we play half as bad next week we'll get horsed by the Saintees.

  9. I would rather Saints let Jamie's contract run down than sell him to the dons for next to nowt. If he has a good start to the 21-22 season there may be interest from league 1 or championship sides in England who, even if it were January, would probably offer more to get him then. He needs to trust and believe in his own ability.

  10. 20 hours ago, faraway saint said:


    It'd ok, you make a cnut of yourself on a regular basis, my job is just to point it out. :1eye

    FOOL! :lol:


    20 hours ago, faraway saint said:

    That's the biggest piece of irony I've seen for some time coming from you. :1eye

    We're done, I won't waste any more time, your true colours are shining through. :byebye

    Your infatuation with me knows no bounds. You really need new patter asshole.

  11. 5 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

    I watched it live and I recognised immediately this was a racist comment.

    If you can't see that then I suggest Specsavers.

    There is, obviously a legal issue, of that there's no doubt.

    By your comment is seems you support racism, shame on you. 

    So you could tell it was a racist comment how? Sherlock Holmes has nothing on you. I don't support racism but I do support the concept that someone is innocent until/unless they're proven guilty. Something that appears to have escaped your philosophy. I don't agree with you, so that makes me racist? This typifies every discussion you have. If someone has the audacity to counter your argument they're drunk, stupid or, now, racist. I prefer to deal in facts, not supposition. The only thing that is certain is that Kamara didn't like what he heard. 

  12. On 4/18/2021 at 2:23 PM, faraway saint said:

    I don't really care what YOU think.

    It was very obvious the player used a racist term (fecking monkey) so I THINK he should be banned for life.

    I do hope his appeal results in a more severe punishment, 


    In what way was it obvious? Two the rangers players accused him of it. He definitely said something that he didn't want noted but I didn't hear it. I assume you didn't hear it. He could have said something derogatory without it being racist. Because you don't care what I think doesn't make it "obvious" that it was a racist comment. No matter how many times you claim it. Like I say. I've no doubt it was derogatory so a ban of some sort is definitely due  but I still believe in innocent unless PROVEN guilty. You seem to think that you know what was said without hearing it. A fantastic trick.

  13. On 4/14/2021 at 6:52 PM, faraway saint said:

    Just seen that on the news.

    10 games, I'd have banned him for life. If they are serious, lifetime ban would have sent out a stronger message.

    Doesn't seem fair that Kamara gets 3 games IMO. 

    The governing body's rules state the punishment for racist abuse should be "at least 10 matches", but Kudela's legal team say they are considering filing an appeal and queried the rigour of the investigation.

    Was there other evidence apart from the two the rangers' players say so? If not then I don't think it would be right to dole out a lifetime ban on opposition players evidence alone. In fact I believe the player is intending to appeal the ten games. 

  14. 2 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

    WBA 2-0 Southampton, can Big Sam possibly pull of his biggest miracle?

    After a superb thrashing of Chelsea last weekend currently looking good for another 3 valuable points.

    60 mins gone. 

    I think it's a bit too late for this. Even winning tonight they would have to overtake Newcastle turning over an 8 point gap with 7 games to go and reverse quite a big goal difference. Allardyce has certainly changed their fortunes right enough.

  • Create New...