stlucifer

I hate to say it but, for me, Porteus was another with just about pass marks.

My only hope is our lads decided to lull the English into a false sense of security in the hope they f**k up their next match and fail to qualify. I can't think of any other reason for that pathetic display.

I will never accept "god save whoever" as my national anthem but that was poor show by our support to drown out the oppositions anthem.

A bit of a bizarre statement. Basically their saying he has been sacked because they have a load of injuries.

Did you ask all of that "mass" of people if they travelled and were impacted by the change of time? I thought not.

As an association, and as supporters, they are so arrogant that, should we turn them over, I suspect a new manager would be on the cards.

It is obvious exiting the EU was stupid and , as the say, "patently not working". How any sane average working person can deny this is beyond me. They would have to be either idiots or part of the sect who voted due their anti immigration/racist viewpoint. And leaving the EU hasn't even given them that crumb of comfort. The Torys, in their desperation to hold onto power using the racist card have royally fecked this country and their opposition, (using the term very loosely as Starmer's red Torys are cut from the same cloth), are determined to act like their afraid of admitting the emperor is indeed naked and will do nothing to allow the people to reverse the folly. The only real way to reverse this idiotic road we've been forced to walk is to sever ties with the real culprits and claim our right to independence.

Clarke seems to have the tactical nuance to utilise what he has at his disposal. I definitely think he's far better than his counterpart in the English setup who, I think, gets fa more praise than he deserves.

Eh? Seriously. WTF are you on about? Are you telling me that Hamilton would take more than a handful of fans across the Irish sea? AFAIC, a totally idiotic reply to, what was after all, a statement based on fact with a little exaggeration for effect..

In fairness, given the level of their support, it probably will only impact a couple of folk.

Au contraire frère. You are citing the claptrap that suits what looks like your "frère" attitude. The epitome of "siding with them". There are lies and damn lies and that narrative is in both those categories. The truth is what it is. There were TWO clubs when the vote was taken to allow the new club to enter the professional leagues. How the hell ANYONE, even a "frère", could argue that they were the same club somehow split in two is beyond me.

It is refreshing to see one of the "big" Glasgow clubs' supporters understand that they need other teams to make a proper game of it. Gate sharing does make sense. Even if it isn't 50-50 after expenses.

Many of my generation watched him playing Burns while they were kids on B&W telly actually believed he WAS Oor Rabbie so good was he at playing that character. RIP.

Obviously you're looking at this through your blue nose glasses. WTF does, "Their scummy irish connections", even mean? Did you mean too rather than to? As I said. FIFA and EUFA don't give a feck. They don't care as long as the money applecart isn't affected. ETA. You are right with one thing. FIFA's input would mean Third Lanark could rise like a pheonix from the ashes and be the same club. It's the same scenario.

They couldn't have been promoted as they didn't exist in a lower league. Correct. A bad mistake on my part. I meant they were installed ahead of more eligible teams.

There's the proof then. Thank you. Transferred from one rangers to another rangers.

My bad. In my defence, given Elvis had talked about STs, I thought it had expanded to include both. Unless he's a secret bluenose.

If indeed he's even in the away dugout by then.

The powers that be can mean anything. I have addressed the attitude of the SFA and EUFA. The first part is fantasy. The second part of your statement is something even those "powers that be" cannot deny is absolute fiction. It is documented in black and white that Sevco applied to JOIN the professional leagues and the attempt to shoehorn them in at an elevated level was thwarted by many honest clubs. In fact. The "real" rangers had to abstain in the vote so I don't know how any "powers that be" can square the circle of having one rangers needing to abstain in a vote to get the other "rangers" into the professional game while claiming there is only one rangers. The moral of this tale? The lunatics definitely can take over an asylum and can easily convince many desperate orcs they were sane and sensible while continuing to take the same orcs cash, hand over fist. The rest of us? We KNOW the truth. NO club was relegated in this instance. They were, in fact, promoted.

To be fair, they have won another few lower league titles as well.

But according to logic, common sense they most certainly did. In fact. Not quite there yet as the original club is still being wound up. 140 years of Rangers liquidated ... after just 8 minutes of meeting | Glasgow Times In December 2022, BDO and HMRC reached a settlement figure of £56 million. To make abundantly clear. This was from the original club/company. One and the same. EUFA really don't give a feck and the SFA, apart from being serial liars, have a vested interest in pretending they are one and the same. ONE top league title and counting.

BBC reporting that (the) rangers request Scottish FA clarity over Kemar Roofe's disallowed goal in Celtic defeat. I think my previous post explains it fine. Smoke screen to hide their inadequacies. Privileged pr**ks. In all seriousness. The explanation has been given tenfold. Nothing will change the decision. Even if they don't agree.

As was pointed out already. No. But it isn't surprising that the timing is so close. We've moved our central defender forward and replaced him with a relatively new recruit. I'm sure things will settle.

Not a fan of either but I have to agree. Pointless thread.