stlucifer

Hopefully this thread will slip into history and never resurface. This is, after all a REAL football forum.

This is the real acid test. The Dons are certainly a different animal to last season and will have studied our setup, I'm going to go out there and say, if we play our game to Robinson's plan to the best of our abilities, that won't matter. With the floating defence/midfield role he has for Gogic I think he has created a system that is going to be hard to combat.

If you build it, (ie team performances), they will come.

A pretty decent performance. I don't think Motherwell had a shot on target all game. We should have won y more. I loved Gogic's reaction to their player diving at the our line. For those who weren't there, he made a swimming gesture.

Good. Does that mean we get rid of Charlie boy?

0-1 Rosenborg. What is it with all those adverts on their shirts. At first I thought Coop was a common Norwegian name.

RIP to a great host. His real secrets were the fact he never forgot his roots and, more importantly made any interview about the interviewee, not him.

None of the above. I actually thought kit 5's pattern was to do with gender and inclusivity. X&Y chromosomes. Apparently it's to do with the stain glass windows of Paisley Abbey.

Motherwell were one of the few who beat us at home.

A cup run would be tremendous but, without O'Hara, I just feel Robinson doesn't have a replacement due to what looks like a bad decision on Central defence recruitment. As usual I hope I'm wrong and Bolton comes in and plays his part. I think we really need Gogic in midfield ATM. Still. From what little I've seen of the rest, Saints shouldn't fear any team in this league.

Indeed. You could pick up the phone and sometimes you'd hear their conversation.

I would like to see Gogic in that midfield role but I'm not convinced Bolton is a secure CH. FWIW, I think Robinson will put Gogic at the heart of the defence.

Are chip shops not "takeaways?

Like most on here, I'm not sure you needed the bit in bold. Our Ultras are jus as bad and though, not openly, our club won't want to discourage their "enthusiasm", within the law.

There are, after all, some things that could make you wish you were deaf.

While I know he was a good player for us I'm not sure where he would fit in in an already fair sized midfield pool. Money would be better spent getting another central defender and/or a left back. I would say a forward too but we're fairly loaded there as well.

That would have been in the second tier. I believe the season before, 70-71, was our best start to a Top League season and we got relegated.

No. As to the other question. Probably before I was born, if ever.

I think you covered yourself with the first two words. There was no need for the word in bold right enough.

Ange's team 2-2 now. And 11 minutes added time at the end of a first half. WTF? They're in danger of sanitising the game to the extent no one will bother watching. What happens to pteople who rely on others to get to and from the game? I'm all for stopping wilful timewasting but not to the extent of adding on every few seconds. It's just crazy.

The big surprise here is that you actually react to this fool. Luckily I have him on ignore so his impact on this forum is minimal to me,

As was pointed out on Sportscene, going by the shadows. Shaughnessy's shadow is in front of him and the shadow of the ball is on the line so it's almost certain that the ball was behind the shadow therefore behind the line. Clear goal.