Jump to content

bazil85

Saints
  • Posts

    10,421
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by bazil85

  1. It means boundary, in other words it would mean on the line. A foul on the line in the opposing box is a penalty. 😂😂 You're having a shocker, just can’t help yourself.
  2. You would say that wouldn’t you. first I’ve heard of ‘borderline outside the box’ fouls, not being penalties 😂😂😂😂😂
  3. That looked a stonewall penalty, any reason why it wasn’t given?
  4. It was tongue in cheek & poking fun at the ‘Kibble bad’ brigade. It’s almost Christmas, lighten up
  5. For me, it’s more about the progress. We know things are too expensive & have changed our operating model to be more cost effective. Don’t think anyone expected we’d be able to fully implement that in one year, after last years results. The results show we aren’t the finished article but it’s a big step in the right direction. It’ll probably be two or three seasons of work behind the scenes before we are fully in a position to take the sort of hits that would come with a poor season. These changes are rarely (if ever) instant. Overall, these results for me say that we have been able to take a far bigger than expected step in the right direction, because we had such a strong season.
  6. Huge improvement on last year. Do we get to give credit to the kibble for good news or are they only responsible when it’s bad? 😂
  7. You’re probably right. It’s harsh on ‘simpletons’ 😂
  8. Which isn’t remotely me changing the rhetoric. It’s been my exact point from day 1 of the VAR debate. Some people got that right away (and agree), others were a bit slower… For you, it’s just not within your capability.
  9. So, was the correction correct or incorrect? It was correct. My issue has never been with that. It’s the holding up the game. VAR doesn’t add (close to) enough value to take away what makes football the best sport in the world. It’s free flowing nature. I’ve made this clear so many times.
  10. Simpleton from a person that still can’t grasp my issue with VAR, isn’t correcting decisions. 🤦‍♂️ If you just don’t have the capacity to understand such a simple concept, maybe you should avoid the subject? 🤷‍♂️
  11. Not the best game to watch, but that’s the kind of game in previous years that we draw or lose against a Livi type club. Dug deep & solid at the back for most of the game. Ayunga looking sharp for a player that’s not touched grass for 11 months. 👏
  12. https://x.com/C4Sport/status/1726695446939054295?t=vwxXiYxQUrYIF0lU_IH7rg&s=08 Even worse ffs. If VAR isn’t going to overturn ridiculous decisions like this, why on earth do we have it?
  13. https://x.com/spflwatch/status/1726720247926071325?s=46&t=o7cZTRZQdQRmoiuMLXLeXw Just VAR doing VAR things 😅
  14. Job done in the end regarding the group but would have been nice to end with a win. Pot 3 for the draw, arguably more attractive than being in pot 2.
  15. Great news, hopefully it brings down the PM & causes even more division in the Tories. Then hopefully she is never to be heard of in frontline politics again. A vile & hate-filled person.
  16. Bye bye Suella. A truly nasty piece of work.
  17. Cool, him. Different spellings from different sources so who knows who’s right/ could be both are acceptable. I’m sure most will agree it’s pretty pedantic either way. (Maybe Slarti will obsess over it with you for several years though.) Hope he gets a shot. If he’s in the right frame of mind for the bench, he can contribute on the park IMO. My point on that was, if we are just not going to give him any form of a chance while our other strikers are miss-firing, doesn’t seem much point in being here. Seems like another example of a person choosing to argue with me for the sake of arguing. That’s so 2018…
  18. 👀👀👀 as said many times before, happy to. You begged for it then came crawling back. But cool, let’s try it again. You’ve embarrassed yourself enough for the day anyway.
  19. Calling someone a liar seems like abuse by your absurd standards. You’re a serial abuser. 😲 You claimed I was using a racist term by using snowflake. It was embarrassing.
  20. Nope, you claimed my use of ‘snowflake’ was racist. It’s was embarrassing how upset you got (especially when you were completely wrong). The straw reaching told me with certainty you were upset.
  21. Seems strange BEK is absolutely fine with abusing (by his take on abuse) some people, but not others. Some would call it clear double standards.
  22. Mind that time you started getting upset because you thought ‘snowflake’ was racist? 😂 This isn’t quite as bad as that but it’s still embarrassing that you can’t differentiate abuse & criticism. Mind you, you don’t understand what ‘ignore’ or not engaging with a person is either.
  23. First off, I don’t believe for a second the claim that the players all come on here & read BAWA 😅 Second, they’re big boys. They deserve nothing but criticism for today because we KNOW they can put in more drive, effort & passion. (In other words, not duds) Third, this isn’t abuse. You’re making yourself look like an utter rocket with such claims. I don’t believe for a second you’re actually such a wet blanket that you think showing frustration at terrible individual & team performances is ‘abuse’ As said, you never have because I’ve never done it. You wouldn’t know positivity if it slapped you across the face… Oh wait, again, can I use that expression or is the tone physical abuse? 😅
×
×
  • Create New...