insaintee Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) Oh you would have wasted your time as you and somner seem to be trying to be the Chuckle Brothers. Whit were they Basiturds at it an aw. To me to you ma F*ckin Arse Edited May 7, 2013 by insaintee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 I read Littlejohn in the Daily Mail this morning Somner. He more or less agrees with you regarding the naming of suspects. I can see both your points now. I've just read Littlejohn's article and like you, Shull, I've always had a lot of time for him. I've read his piece through twice and he really seems torn. He says at one point that he agrees with the ex Met chief Ian Blair that suspects must be named when they are arrested. But at the end of his article, in the last five or six paragraphs, he makes his discomfort with what is going on very clear. He states quite categorically that these high profile suspects cannot possibly expect a fair trial. I agree with that and that has been the thrust of all I've said about this whole sordid mess. Because the crimes or alleged crimes are so hellish, it seems some folk are quite happy to forget about the letter of the law that states everyone is entitled to a fair trial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest somner9 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 I've had a good look through these posts and the "Anonymity or Accountability" thread and I can't see anyone suggesting that these rapists/serial child abusers shouldn't get a fair trial! Mystified why that keeps being suggested when no one has mentioned it??? My line, unlike some has been consistent: investigate, CPS independent assessment, arrest, charge, name. It is one of the key foundations of our criminal justice system, and no one should get special treatment. I think that explains my position clearly and succinctly. And I never felt the need to fire off insults when my arguement lost traction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 Aye Rick, Littlejohn suggested it was fine to name a suspect after he was charged, but he felt uncomfortable naming anybody before a charge had been made. Which is fair enough i suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeithBuddie Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 Tomorrow's Daily Mirror, FFS!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 That's Tarbuck nicked an all. 70's abuse on a boy, allegedly. It looks like benny hill was the only 70's celeb who wasnt up to something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie1877smfc Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 the prison panto is going to be the best ever this year very experienced cast by all accounts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 I've had a good look through these posts and the "Anonymity or Accountability" thread and I can't see anyone suggesting that these rapists/serial child abusers shouldn't get a fair trial! Mystified why that keeps being suggested when no one has mentioned it??? My line, unlike some has been consistent: investigate, CPS independent assessment, arrest, charge, name. It is one of the key foundations of our criminal justice system, and no one should get special treatment. I think that explains my position clearly and succinctly. And I never felt the need to fire off insults when my arguement lost traction You are on here calling them dirty bastards before they've had a trial at all. Seriously can you really be this stupid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 You are on here calling them dirty bastards before they've had a trial at all. Seriously can you really be this stupid? Yes, this is the guy who started this thread with the heading 'Ya Manky Bastard', and now he says he believes in a fair trial. An open mind has to go hand in hand with that. The irony of it is lost on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest somner9 Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 (edited) Best laugh in ages!!! Rick has Joined forces with Oaksoft/Dicko (pictured below) As a result I feel as if I'm being savaged by this: Edited May 8, 2013 by somner9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest somner9 Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Yes, this is the guy who started this thread with the heading 'Ya Manky Bastard', and now he says he believes in a fair trial. An open mind has to go hand in hand with that. The irony of it is lost on him. So you couldn't find anyone suggesting that serial child abusers/rapists should'nt have a fair trial. Fair enough at least you were honest about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Morality of the sick bag , call it what you like, sometimes the reality of life is as we see day in day out , indeed just a bag sick. You cannot deny it , sad , but true, ask most folk in any walk of life, they'll have a tale or two. Oops, you are not a cave dweller with no neighbours , right , just checking , no offence....no Ivory Tower ? I have no doubt whatsoever that in some cases self interest and a few coin is most certainly the motivation, that is unquestionable ...................pop down to court most days you'll see / hear some seriously morally corrupt and financially motivated shenanigans and the what's in it for me mindset most certainly plays a part. I am not saying for one minute all cases of this distasteful nature are all about the lucre, but I'll bet you ( heh heh ) a lot are. Equally there are surely horrendous tales of abuse and innocence lost , that too is undeniable and the tragedy is it will continue, always has and always will. I hope that's not too uncomfortable an observation for you. Surely you are not so naive or aherm ' moronic' as you so poetically put it, to dismiss my expressed opinion as irrelevant , surely you have more about you than to fail to realise that these cases are a minefield and that there are occasions as has been seen with Yewtree currently that there is a bandwagon effect. This is ironically created in no small way by the people engaged in exercising everyone's rights under law. I'm sure you understand that................... Ok , so according to you I'm just a sicko, I have no moral fibre, I'm a rotten member of society because I express a contrary or objectionable opinion to you, well, thanks. If only I could be as righteous and good as you then........must be great. You know there is a name for the kind of intolerance you expressed to me on my legitimate view / and or of the views of others.................go figure Anyway , all cases on their merits , for sure civil rights and all that, undeniable and absolutely, so what's the problem. I'm only expressing my opinion, it is after all as you so nicely put it , my moronic civil right to do so after all. Jist sayin like .................night night , don't let the bed bugs bite ..........and that is not a euphemism If this makes you comfortable then fine. you are missing the point so badly there is little point in carrying on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest somner9 Posted May 14, 2013 Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 So enough evidence to go to trial. Good to see justice in action! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22520755 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted February 6, 2014 Report Share Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) So enough evidence to go to trial. Good to see justice in action! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22520755 You'll be fizzing, again. Just been found not guilty. What a PITY. Edited February 6, 2014 by faraway saint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whydowebother Posted February 6, 2014 Report Share Posted February 6, 2014 Ya manky bastard! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22366981 Perhaps post a topic without a pre-judgement ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted February 6, 2014 Report Share Posted February 6, 2014 You'll be fizzing, again. Just been found not guilty. What a PITY. But thanks to the fact that we have a nation of somners out there ……or cunts as we used to call them where I was brought up…..the man's reputation will always be tarnished. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted February 6, 2014 Report Share Posted February 6, 2014 I think that the brief speech he made outside court would be enough to tarnish his reputation. And yes, I know he was found to be not guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted February 6, 2014 Report Share Posted February 6, 2014 I think that the brief speech he made outside court would be enough to tarnish his reputation. And yes, I know he was found to be not guilty. You must be hearing something I didn't? Suppose he could have said "GIRFUY" since he's been through hell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Gilhooley Posted February 6, 2014 Report Share Posted February 6, 2014 I think that the brief speech he made outside court would be enough to tarnish his reputation. And yes, I know he was found to be not guilty. I thought he was very dignified given what hes been through over the last nine months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted February 7, 2014 Report Share Posted February 7, 2014 I think that the brief speech he made outside court would be enough to tarnish his reputation. And yes, I know he was found to be not guilty. Some people can't see the wood for the trees. Are you a sore loser, Tony? Never mind, a bit of practice for 18th.September. Maybe as well Somner doesn't post. William Roache's solicitors are on the lookout for libelous statements. The completely erroneous 'Ya Manky Bastard' would take some whacking. Might be safe as long as it was confined to our forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted February 7, 2014 Report Share Posted February 7, 2014 Coming from the guy who wanted that little lad's mother hung, drawn and quartered before she was actually charged with his murder. You're spot on again Maxi old bean! another manky bastard exposed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendo Posted February 7, 2014 Report Share Posted February 7, 2014 (edited) Now we have many of Roache's co stars coming out saying he should never have been prosecuted, hope the people who told "lies" about him are now themselves prosecuted, and having a go at the CPS for bringing the case. This is presumably because there is a misguided view among some people, particularly when it supports their beliefs, that the judicial system is infallable. Plenty guilty people walk free, and some innocent get convicted. Edited February 7, 2014 by Hendo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted February 7, 2014 Report Share Posted February 7, 2014 (edited) Some people can't see the wood for the trees. Are you a sore loser, Tony? Never mind, a bit of practice for 18th.September. Maybe as well Somner doesn't post. William Roache's solicitors are on the lookout for libelous statements. The completely erroneous 'Ya Manky Bastard' would take some whacking. Might be safe as long as it was confined to our forum. Sore loser? Not in this case Rick as I had no involvement in the case.You're getting a obsessed with a referendum you don't have a vote in. Edited February 7, 2014 by TPAFKATS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted February 7, 2014 Report Share Posted February 7, 2014 Is that corrie now 0 for 2 in the sex case prosecutions. It would appear that its only those at the beeb who are guilty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted February 7, 2014 Report Share Posted February 7, 2014 Sore loser? Not in this case Rick as I had no involvement in the case. You're getting a obsessed with a referendum you don't have a vote in. Presumably then you have no regrets at all about some of your posts last year. Most people have a problem admitting they were wrong so don't worry about it. So I as a Scot still living in the UK and having lots of relations in Scotland, have no right to an opinion on what becomes of my homeland? I admit I never expected to see an egalitarian society in my lifetime and if you're a typical Scot Nat, then I'll be right. Or are you Labour with Nationalist views? I think Scotland should stick with the Union but I don't froth at the mouth when someone disagrees with my view. You know why I've said so much? I love getting over the top reaction and bile as Nationalists get their knickers in a twist. I've never come across a crowd who get drawn so easily like a moth to a candle. It's too easy. But I'm fed up with it. No challenge any more. I'll butt out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.