ds10 Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Can't see us being able to terminate a player due to breach of contract who we don't technically own. If that's the case, whoever negotiates contract on our behalf must be a complete idiot. I'm sure there's a basic clause in every players contract, loan or otherwise, specifying that they need to turn up for work........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon_Towel Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 I don't think we have a contract with him per se, more with Nice. We agreed with Nice to cover a part of/all of his contract for the season, and they're enforcing that. Can't see us being able to terminate a player due to breach of contract who we don't technically own. If we could have I'm sure we would have by now. Still spouting unfounded negative nonsense I see... We also could be paying none of his contract but that's not negative enough to mention. Of course we can terminate the loan, say if a player misses training or a match... Grounds for termination. Silly sausage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Still spouting unfounded negative nonsense I see... We also could be paying none of his contract but that's not negative enough to mention. Of course we can terminate the loan, say if a player misses training or a match... Grounds for termination. Silly sausage Welcome back, Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ged62 Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Bahoken all down too Danny........clueless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Isma was also all down to Danny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 IF Bahoken walked out then I'm absolutely certain that we can, at the very least, claim breach of contract by Nice as he would be deemed "faulty". This should give leverage to renegotiate the terms. ie. We'll keep him, give him training facilities. But , you pay for the waste of space. THEN. We play him. He scores a barrowload and gets us to the Scottish Cup final and has 93,000 pregnant womaen after him when he leaves. Seemples! Makes no sense. We sent him back to Nice, they tried to loan him to Bastia, they found out they couldn't and sent him back to us. If they were paying him, why would they do that? Danny's made it clear he doesn't want him, therefore, why is he here? Still spouting unfounded negative nonsense I see... We also could be paying none of his contract but that's not negative enough to mention. Of course we can terminate the loan, say if a player misses training or a match... Grounds for termination. Silly sausage Strange post here. The loan fee was the reason the initial loan was delayed in the summer, so he's certainly cost the club money. If we could terminate him, why on earth is here? He went awol after the Firhill game and he's now just back, he missed plenty of training and plenty of matches. We have a contract with Nice not with Bahoken, we are liable for his wages for the rest of the season. If we could have terminated him we would have by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldo_j Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 (edited) Makes no sense. We sent him back to Nice, they tried to loan him to Bastia, they found out they couldn't and sent him back to us. If they were paying him, why would they do that? Danny's made it clear he doesn't want him, therefore, why is he here? Why is he here? Maybe he left his favourite pair of jeans in the flat he was renting and came back to pick them up? Maybe he met a burd? Just cause he is in Scotland doesn't mean he is back here. His loan was terminated so he can go sightseeing for 6 months for all I care. Edited January 11, 2014 by aldo_j Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlucifer Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Makes no sense. We sent him back to Nice, they tried to loan him to Bastia, they found out they couldn't and sent him back to us. If they were paying him, why would they do that? Danny's made it clear he doesn't want him, therefore, why is he here? Perhaps I should have emphasised that the latter part of the post was tongue in cheek but I thought it obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevo_smfc Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 We sent Cornell and Caprice back to their parent clubs early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ged62 Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Isma was also all down to Danny! And? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tam M Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 He has tweeted a picture of Fake Saints ground saying Match Day... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 He has tweeted a picture of Fake Saints ground saying Match Day... He'll be in the squad. Guaranteed. He's got some amount of crawling to do considering he's been AWOL since the November internationals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Gilhooley Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 He'll be in the squad. Guaranteed. He's got some amount of crawling to do considering he's been AWOL since the November internationals. he IS on the bench . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 (edited) A very odd situation. I cannot believe we would leave ourselves in the scenario whereby our hands are tied and the guy cannot be punted. Oh wait....I can! Is it possible that he has been thrown a lifeline and an opportunity to redeem himself by the club? Too far-fetched, surely. Edited January 11, 2014 by Drew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyg Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Player going out on loan the same day that he comes on as a sub and goes through the motions , player coming back into squad after walking out , what a shambles ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jake Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 He will come good ;-) He is the one we were waiting for if I remember :-0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 A very odd situation. I cannot believe we would leave ourselves in the scenario whereby our hands are tied and the guy cannot be punted. Oh wait....I can! Is it possible that he has been thrown a lifeline and an opportunity to redeem himself by the club? Too far-fetched, surely. No. Redemption beckons! Come on, St Stephane! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanarkshire_Bud Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 This will be the funniest thread of all time if he scores the winner. He must be guaranteed to get on as Thommo has been knackered the last few weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aber 87 Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 Nice don't want him, Danny Shankly doesn't want him. He was offered to Arthurlie but they didnae want him either. Are you sure this is the same player that Danny Shankly was waiting for????????????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 He actually looked half decent today, although that's not saying much as the rest were shite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colombano4saints Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 He actually looked half decent today, although that's not saying much as the rest were shite. The only guy today that actually got his head up and looked for a pass. Wouldn't mind giving him a run in the team if I'm honest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorizaar Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 The only guy today that actually got his head up and looked for a pass. Wouldn't mind giving him a run in the team if I'm honest Agreed. Would start him at Easter Road next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 The only guy today that actually got his head up and looked for a pass. Wouldn't mind giving him a run in the team if I'm honest Agreed. Would start him at Easter Road next week. Imagine saying that before today........................torn to shreds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 (edited) Give Bahookie a run in the Team. I think he'll come good. Just in time for Scottish Cup victory starting in February and ending in an Open top Bus Parade in May through Paisley. Edited January 11, 2014 by shull Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windae cleaner Posted January 11, 2014 Report Share Posted January 11, 2014 He actually looked half decent today, although that's not saying much as the rest were shite. Was that point today? The rest were that bad that he looked decent because you weren't expecting that much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.