DougJamie Posted June 2, 2017 Report Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 minute ago, oaksoft said: I think I will leave Most sensible thing you have said in months Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcdowell76 Posted June 2, 2017 Report Share Posted June 2, 2017 7 hours ago, oaksoft said: I think I will leave you two lunatics to talk to each other. I'm not involved in the debate and I've got DougJamieon ignore. So, yet again, your post is pointless. The reason you are leaving is because you are not a scientist and DougJamie is giving you a roasting, just as Shull did! You're a fantasist who spends Xmas day alone posting on this forum about worklife balance along with your fellow sad loser, premium bond boy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted June 2, 2017 Report Share Posted June 2, 2017 15 hours ago, shull said: Well done Donald http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40128431 FECK THE POLAR BEARS Cretin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 4 hours ago, mcdowell76 said: I'm not involved in the debate and I've got DougJamieon ignore. So, yet again, your post is pointless. The reason you are leaving is because you are not a scientist and DougJamie is giving you a roasting, just as Shull did! You're a fantasist who spends Xmas day alone posting on this forum about worklife balance along with your fellow sad loser, premium bond boy! I am not a scientist? You really want to play this game? I will bite just this once to see if you have any substance about you. Name your topic and let's discuss it. I have access to almost every reputable science journal in the world. Pick a peer reviewed scientific paper and start the conversation. I would prefer either Physics or Chemistry but I am happy to give any peer reviewd scientific paper a go. Ball is in your court. Wiki doesnt count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 He made less posts than you that Xmas day. I am not a scientist? You really want to play this game? I will bite just this once to see if you have any substance about you. Name your topic and let's discuss it. I have access to almost every reputable science journal in the world. Pick a peer reviewed scientific paper and start the conversation. I would prefer either Physics or Chemistry but I am happy to give any peer reviewd scientific paper a go. Ball is in your court. Wiki doesnt count. These are some of the reasons why almost every post of his GN is followed by his hashtag I'm not involved in the debate and I've got DougJamieon ignore. So, yet again, your post is pointless. The reason you are leaving is because you are not a scientist and DougJamie is giving you a roasting, just as Shull did! [emoji38] You're a fantasist who spends Xmas day alone posting on this forum about worklife balance along with your fellow sad loser, premium bond boy! [emoji38] #thichasfcuk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 5 hours ago, oaksoft said: I am not a scientist? You really want to play this game? I will bite just this once to see if you have any substance about you. Name your topic and let's discuss it. I have access to almost every reputable science journal in the world. Pick a peer reviewed scientific paper and start the conversation. I would prefer either Physics or Chemistry but I am happy to give any peer reviewd scientific paper a go. Ball is in your court. Wiki doesnt count. I've got 'O' level physics and chemistry so I feel sufficiently qualified to add a comment. My favourite peer is Lord Snooty. He had a paper him and his pals read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 (edited) 31 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said: My favourite peer is Brighton. My favourite pear peer pair is a Bartlett........... Whew. Edited June 3, 2017 by faraway saint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 I feel like I'm peering over the edge of a very, very, dark, bottomless pit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 6 hours ago, oaksoft said: I am not a scientist? You really want to play this game? I will bite just this once to see if you have any substance about you. Name your topic and let's discuss it. I have access to almost every reputable science journal in the world. Pick a peer reviewed scientific paper and start the conversation. I would prefer either Physics or Chemistry but I am happy to give any peer reviewd scientific paper a go. Ball is in your court. Wiki doesnt count. Often times big industry is funding research , they are paying scientists to "find" the answers they want . . it is ironic that , the wee guy who first mentioned "green house gases" had his "research " jumped on by the science community because it was viewed as the possible saviour of the long cooling cycle we had been on from 1946 to c1977 , they actually thought we were facing another ice age . . Global climate change is happening all the time. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted June 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 1 hour ago, Slartibartfast said: My favourite peer is Brighton. Mine is Paula. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddiecat Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 19 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said: Is that who satisfies your urolagnia? Don't talk pish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted June 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 39 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said: Is that who satisfies your urolagnia? Qui Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 3 hours ago, Slartibartfast said: I don't think that there is any argument about whether climate change is happening or not or about whether climate change is a natural phenomenon or not. The argument is about whether or not humans are having an effect on the rate of climate change, the possible consequences and what, if anything, can/should be done to lessen that effect. Biofuel has been available here for a while now and hydrogen is available in other countries but if you look at the size of the British Isles on the globe , even if every vehicle on our roads was converted to renewable green fuel tomorrow , on a global scale it would still be insignificant. . .. .as long as the oil industry has a grip of the planet , wholesale use of green/renewable fuel is still a long way off. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 (edited) 4 hours ago, saintnextlifetime said: Often times big industry is funding research , they are paying scientists to "find" the answers they want . . it is ironic that , the wee guy who first mentioned "green house gases" had his "research " jumped on by the science community because it was viewed as the possible saviour of the long cooling cycle we had been on from 1946 to c1977 , they actually thought we were facing another ice age . . Global climate change is happening all the time. . That bit in bold is Absolutely correct but absolutely irrelevant too I am afraid. Nobody is denying that. As for your first sentence, I am not sure what you are getting at. Who has done this? Edited June 3, 2017 by oaksoft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlucifer Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 On 6/2/2017 at 10:13 AM, DougJamie said: Yeah mate the reception is a bit dodgy on top of the Cullins though Can't you direct him to somewhere with NO internet access? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 30 minutes ago, saintnextlifetime said: Biofuel has been available here for a while now and hydrogen is available in other countries but if you look at the size of the British Isles on the globe , even if every vehicle on our roads was converted to renewable green fuel tomorrow , on a global scale it would still be insignificant. . .. .as long as the oil industry has a grip of the planet , wholesale use of green/renewable fuel is still a long way off. . That is probably true but the oil and gas industry will die when alternatives become cheaper. Sadly it will be driven by financial decisions and not logic. Personally I reckon we wont make the changes fast enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 8 minutes ago, oaksoft said: That bit in bold is Absolutely correct but absolutely irrelevant too I am afraid. Nobody is denying that. As for your first sentence, I am not sure what you are getting at. Who has done this? Good to know . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, oaksoft said: That is probably true but the oil and gas industry will die when alternatives become cheaper. Sadly it will be driven by financial decisions and not logic. Personally I reckon we wont make the changes fast enough. Vested interest would have to change first - in the meantime , the whole Global Warming/Climate Change bus is very lucrative for them . . At least they now admit that diesel is a dirty fuel . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, saintnextlifetime said: Vested interest would have to change first - in the meantime , the whole Global Warming/Climate Change bus is very lucrative for them . . Lucrative for who? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 8 minutes ago, saintnextlifetime said: Good to know . . TBH, I thought everyone knew this by now. It depresses me to hear the anti-GW tin foil hat brigade still using it as an excuse to do nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 22 hours ago, oaksoft said: That bit in bold is Absolutely correct but absolutely irrelevant too I am afraid. Nobody is denying that. As for your first sentence, I am not sure what you are getting at. Who has done this? TBH, I thought everyone knew this by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Biofuel has been available here for a while now and hydrogen is available in other countries but if you look at the size of the British Isles on the globe , even if every vehicle on our roads was converted to renewable green fuel tomorrow , on a global scale it would still be insignificant. . .. .as long as the oil industry has a grip of the planet , wholesale use of green/renewable fuel is still a long way off. . I'm beginning to wonder if there are any of our problems that the House of Saud aren't at least partly responsible for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 It's not their fault that the SFA is run by a bunch of useless twats. Or is it? Edit: Just to be clear, the last line is referring to whether it is the House of Saud's fault, not whether the SFA is run by useless twats. Is Cheesy playing out there??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 hour ago, TPAFKATS said: I'm beginning to wonder if there are any of our problems that the House of Saud aren't at least partly responsible for. They don't run the oil industry at a planetary level , mind. Oil is a very touchy subject though , regimes have been toppled over it and wars have been fought over it , come to think of it - wars are still being fought over it . . Those burning oil fields in Kuwait must have caused a lot of greenhouse gases , mind. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 They don't run the oil industry at a planetary level , mind. [emoji3] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.