bluto Posted October 23, 2014 Report Share Posted October 23, 2014 It's also his job?Aye, true...."The Quiet Man". Nobody does it better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Same old tories, lying bastards They obviously didn't include the British ruling class in their studies. Most of these cunts haven't worked for as many generations as we can remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/george-osborne-in-talks-to-bring-american-football-team-to-wembley-stadium-9810536.html Nice to see georgie boy has his priorities right. He wants to invest in an NFL team so he has somewhere to take his son Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 David Cameron refusing to pay a 'bill' of 1.7Billion Euros from EU. Is this the same guy that told Scotland that refusing to pay your debts would increase the cost of borrowing and make you an outcast with money markets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Oh, it's £1.7b which is 2b euros...My bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 I'm just confused...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 I'm just confused......So is Cameron. He hasn't realised that paying this money is simply 'pooling and sharing' resourses... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a50lennyc Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 David Cameron refusing to pay a 'bill' of 1.7Billion Euros from EU. Is this the same guy that told Scotland that refusing to pay your debts would increase the cost of borrowing and make you an outcast with money markets? would refusing to pay this bill increase the cost of borrowing and make us an outcast with money markets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 would refusing to pay this bill increase the cost of borrowing and make us an outcast with money markets? You would think so, given that's what we were told by the unionists would happen if the Scottish government had refused to pay their share of our debt. Of course they could have ben lying or scaremongering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29771470 Here's how to "paper over the cracks". Sadly we'll all pay for the short term measures put in place to fool the gullible. When you adopt UKIP policies and become one, like the tories, and play the immigration card, matters like this tend to get hidden by the distasteful and shameful upsurge in jingoism by other southern friends. Better together? More like shafted together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a50lennyc Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 You would think so, given that's what we were told by the unionists would happen if the Scottish government had refused to pay their share of our debt. Of course they could have ben lying or scaremongering. I'm pretty sure that the "debt" the unionists were referring to was the government's issued gilts. And I'm pretty sure that you are well aware of the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a50lennyc Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 shameful upsurge in jingoism by other southern friends. Yes = shameful upsurge in jingoism from the northerners SNP = UKIP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 I see the fruitcake has adopted yet another alias. Another entry onto the ignore list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 And talking of jingoism by the UKIPTories.................. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29776970 Coming (far) right from those in charge me old fruitcake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 I'm pretty sure that the "debt" the unionists were referring to was the government's issued gilts. And I'm pretty sure that you are well aware of the difference. So , l take it that iTony came under the ban hammer as well then. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barney Posted October 27, 2014 Report Share Posted October 27, 2014 anyone else disappointed that david cameron wasn't taken out by the crusty "jogger" earlier on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted October 27, 2014 Report Share Posted October 27, 2014 anyone else disappointed that david cameron wasn't taken out by the crusty "jogger" earlier on?It's gone from attacked to pushed by and now being reported as bumped into.Bumped into a jogger in leeds is better than ed milibands conference speech tales of meeting ordinary folk on hampstead heath... Although Cameron came to no harm, I'm sure it will be used as an excuse for further measures to remove the politicians from the public. Especially after last week's occupy parliament square event. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted October 28, 2014 Report Share Posted October 28, 2014 It's gone from attacked to pushed by and now being reported as bumped into. Bumped into a jogger in leeds is better than ed milibands conference speech tales of meeting ordinary folk on hampstead heath... Although Cameron came to no harm, I'm sure it will be used as an excuse for further measures to remove the politicians from the public. Especially after last week's occupy parliament square event. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thRUIjeddrU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted October 28, 2014 Report Share Posted October 28, 2014 As a runner, I think this was a cack-handed attempt to run into Cameron. The guy could easily have avoided any collision - there was distinct movement towards the target. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted October 29, 2014 Report Share Posted October 29, 2014 As a runner, I think this was a cack-handed attempt to run into Cameron. The guy could easily have avoided any collision - there was distinct movement towards the target. Besides , the guy didn't look like yer average jogger/runner/harrier/ lcf. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint in exile Posted October 29, 2014 Report Share Posted October 29, 2014 It looked to me as if the guy had ran between the parked cars and was trying to head across the grass behind Cameron when he was stopped. I think the movement you are referring to was just him trying to dodge round one of the bodyguards. Just my opinion. The footage is pretty crap, but I thought he mad a deliberate movement towards Cameron. Pity he wasn't driving a truck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted October 29, 2014 Report Share Posted October 29, 2014 It looked to me as if the guy had ran between the parked cars and was trying to head across the grass behind Cameron when he was stopped. I think the movement you are referring to was just him trying to dodge round one of the bodyguards. Just my opinion. Ok, so I had another look. Or two... Still can't really see him as being a runner and also there was a totally clear path between Cameron et al, that he chose NOT to take... however that may be because he's carrying a white poly bag (or something) and he could well have been veering towards dumping it in that handy bin that Cameron stands in front of. So you're right - he's heading not across the grass, though , but towards the bin. Probably genuinely just unlucky timing for him and for Cameron, neither giving a toss about the existence of the other in that coincidental moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlucifer Posted October 29, 2014 Report Share Posted October 29, 2014 (edited) Ok, so I had another look. Or two... Still can't really see him as being a runner and also there was a totally clear path between Cameron et al, that he chose NOT to take... however that may be because he's carrying a white poly bag (or something) and he could well have been veering towards dumping it in that handy bin that Cameron stands in front of. So you're right - he's heading not across the grass, though , but towards the bin. Probably genuinely just unlucky timing for him and for Cameron, neither giving a toss about the existence of the other in that coincidental moment. Certainly heading toward the garbage..... Edited October 29, 2014 by stlucifer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted October 29, 2014 Report Share Posted October 29, 2014 Was it a grassy knoll? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 As a runner, I think this was a cack-handed attempt to run into Cameron. The guy could easily have avoided any collision - there was distinct movement towards the target. Yes, you would definitely have to be a "runner" to observe that. None of the rest of us are really aware of the co-ordination of brain, feet and legs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.