Stuart Dickson Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 (edited) Sturgeon stated in Glasgow , that there would be no coalition with the conservative/unionist trumpets (trumpets is my word not hers). . ....and you are willing to believe a power hungry politician? There's a new concept Edited March 5, 2015 by Stuart Dickson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 I asked a simple question, why wont you answer it? Its like most of the stuff you write, made up lies. It's quite simple. You're posts are generally libellous. I'm just leaving you to get on with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smcc Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 ....and you are willing to believe a power hungry politician? There's a new concept I thought you believed everything the Tories say! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 ....and you are willing to believe a power hungry politician? There's a new concept No offence but I'd believe Creepy Jim Murphy before I believed anything coming out of your mouth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2becks Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 No offence but I'd believe Creepy Jim Murphy before I believed anything coming out of your mouth. I love when people preface the most insulting phrases in the English language with 'no offence but...' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 (edited) Would that not be for a court to decide? And, if you went down that road and lost (and you probably would because everyone knows your character already so it's not being defamed) then you would more than likely be guilty of Defamation of Character (it is Scotland after all) for claiming he made libelous posts. Go on, go for it. Go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on.I quite like StuD's post you're replying to here. It's (yet another) shining example of his complete lack of understanding when it comes to what defines Scotland as a separate nation with its own unique institutions completely separate to, and different from, the rest of the UK Edited March 6, 2015 by salmonbuddie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Talks ng of creepy looking politicians Humza Yousef on Question Time last night. He sweated more than Lee Evans running a marathon. Surely he was a disastrous choice to put on National TV especially since this was perfectly set for Nicola Sturgeon on her doorstep. I guess she must have been running "feart" of the likes of Ruth Davidson and Toby Young. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Oh and Danny Alexander hit the nail on the head perfectly when he said any party willing to put the SNP into government at Westminster would be doing the equivalent of letting Guy Fawkes run the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyg Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Oh and Danny Alexander hit the nail on the head perfectly when he said any party willing to put the SNP into government at Westminster would be doing the equivalent of letting Guy Fawkes run the country. Vote Guy Fawkes — The Only Man Ever To Enter Parliament With Honest Intentions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 (edited) Vote Guy Fawkes — The Only Man Ever To Enter Parliament With Honest IntentionsThat's a sad statement on Scottish Politics Billy isn't it? Guy Fawkes was active member of a terrorist organisation who wanted to kill the King because he was a Protestant. This was in 1606, some 134 years before the act of Union. You're flippant post may well be right but isn't it sad that we all have written off the intentions of every single Scotsman to enter parliament. Yet still we have a number of people on this forum who profess to support the SNP Edited March 6, 2015 by Stuart Dickson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 (edited) That's a sad statement on Scottish Politics Billy isn't it? Guy Fawkes was active member of a terrorist organisation who wanted to kill the King because he was a Protestant. This was in 1606, 1605 some 134 102 years before the act of Union. You're Your flippant post may well be right but isn't it sad that we all have written off the intentions of every single Scotsman to enter parliament. Yet still we have a number of people on this forum who profess to support the SNP Edit - It's basic errors like those above which mean in a dispute between you and another poster (any other poster) I'll always believe the other guy.............. Edited March 6, 2015 by Bud the Baker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Even if the other guy is saying that Dorothy is good looking and intelligent? Reductio ad absurdum....................... I'll jump off that bridge when I come to it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Edit - It's basic errors like those above which mean in a dispute between you and another poster (any other poster) I'll always believe the other guy.............. Hands up - basic mistake. But it doesn't change the point I was making. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Hands up - basic mistake. But it doesn't change the point I was making. ...............nor does it make it valid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Hands up - basic mistake. But it doesn't change the point I was making. You were making a point? Sorry I was asleep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 Mr Dickson - Sturgeon was on question time either last week or the Thursday previous. I know the SNP are enjoying unprecedented popularity but it would be a bit off for the bbc to have her on 2 weeks running. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted March 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Electioneering in full swing. Anything other than a Conservative victory will be a f*cking disaster for our wonderful Country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Electioneering in full swing. Anything other than a Conservative victory will be a f*cking disaster for our wonderful Country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) Mr Dickson - Sturgeon was on question time either last week or the Thursday previous. I know the SNP are enjoying unprecedented popularity but it would be a bit off for the bbc to have her on 2 weeks running. Was it 19th Feb'. . http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b053ghpb/question-time-19022015 Do keep up. . Edited by Tom for language Edited March 31, 2015 by saintnextlifetime Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Was it 19th Feb'. . http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b053ghpb/question-time-19022015 Do keep up. . Edited by Tom for language From that crucial Scottish Election Ward of Stockton On Tees. Why won't the First Minister of Scotland appear in front of a Scottish audience? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 That's a sad statement on Scottish Politics Billy isn't it? Guy Fawkes was active member of a terrorist organisation who wanted to kill the King because he was a Protestant. This was in 1606, some 134 years before the act of Union. You're flippant post may well be right but isn't it sad that we all have written off the intentions of every single Scotsman to enter parliament. Yet still we have a number of people on this forum who profess to support the SNP Watching Michael Portillo's excellent programme on the BBC yesterday it appears that this much lauded Guido Fawkes that our Nationalists appear to love cried out in one final act of bravado that he had wished that his explosives would have been powerful enough to blow all the Scots back to Scotland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlucifer Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Electioneering in full swing. Anything other than a Conservative victory will be a f*cking disaster for our wonderful Country. Now I know you're at the windup! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted March 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Not at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Now I know you're at the windup! Shull at the wynd-up ? You must be dreaming. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
another alias Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 I see that Plaid Cymru have come and out and said that the SNP, the Greens and themselves will negotiate jointly in the event of a hung parliament... mmmm Is this SNP policy? I'm not sure I have seen this mentioned? Am I mistaken? Why on earth would the SNP agree to that? And why should they sell Scotland down the river and agree to allow these 2 parties to piggy back on Scottish votes before the SNP even know if their help is needed? Surely Welsh nationalism is something for the Welsh people to decide? Surely if Welsh nationalism is rejected by the Welsh people and Plaid Cymru's seats aren't need then why on earth would the SNP allow them to negotiate with them? Plaid Cymru are unhappy with the fact that Scotland gets more money than them... ignoring the fact that the reason for this is the vast land mass of Scotland. Getting into bed with the Welsh nationalists over this matter could end up with Scotland getting less money and playing into the hands of UKIP. And what on earth does Scotland have in common with a Green MP from the rich southern English city of Brighton? Why on earth would the SNP get into bed with a party that wants to wreck the North Sea Oil industry? It looks to me as if the SNP are hiding this from the Scottish electorate and are preparing to sell Scotland down the river. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.