Jump to content

St. Mirren Looking For A New Manager


Recommended Posts

We got relegated by a distance this season. That's much worse than Murray's worst ever season as a manager!

There either is talent in the Dumbarton youth ranks, or there is not. I suspect strongly that there were no players good enough to step up from their youth set-up, given it's a small part-time club punching way above its weight. At St Mirren, there are young players good enough for the Championship - let's see what he does with them.

He seems to have an eye for signing promising kids on loan from other clubs. That, in itself, has to be encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Joined Dumbarton in November 2012. I think it's fair to judge him over his squads from the last two seasons only as they were all his players. He's definitely not a coach who will progress youngsters through the club and even with experienced players in his squad he's proved to be poor at organising them defensively and making Dumbarton a difficult team to beat.

I'll stick with my verdict. The appointment is uninspiring, poor, even bizarre given all the talk about youth development being the way forward.

Oh and aye Ferguson was judged by St Mirren on his first managerial appointment. Willie Cunningham recommended him to Willie Todd having seen him in action at East Stirling.

I reckon you're in a much better position to gauge all this than the various Dumbarton fans who are, almost to a man, sorry to see him go.

Claiming he's 'definitely not a coach who will progress youngsters through the club' is, by any measure, a completely bullshit statement. How can you say this is definitely the case?

Anyway, I think this appointment is a step in the right direction. However, there is a huge amount of hard work to be done this summer to ensure Murray has the best possible chance to mount a promotion challenge next season. We should be aiming for the playoffs at least. That's not to say I expect to get there, but I want to see a squad that will at least have the ability to push for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who was your choice for the gig StuD?

I posted a name on the thread earlier. My intention was to add the name of someone who hadn't previously been mentioned and someone who had a track record of success with youth development. I named Gardner Speirs. I'd also mentioned Pat Kenny as a manager who continues to be extremely successful in Ireland.

I could have understood appointments like Adams or Reid. I don't think they would have had me rushing out for a season ticket but I would have understood that the club were trying to make an appointment that would put the club in the promotion mix. With Murray I honestly can't see what the intention is though. He's not been successful in any way at all and he's not got a record of youth development. He doesn't even have a great record as a coach throughout the Scottish game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted a name on the thread earlier. My intention was to add the name of someone who hadn't previously been mentioned and someone who had a track record of success with youth development. I named Gardner Speirs. I'd also mentioned Pat Kenny as a manager who continues to be extremely successful in Ireland.

I could have understood appointments like Adams or Reid. I don't think they would have had me rushing out for a season ticket but I would have understood that the club were trying to make an appointment that would put the club in the promotion mix. With Murray I honestly can't see what the intention is though. He's not been successful in any way at all and he's not got a record of youth development. He doesn't even have a great record as a coach throughout the Scottish game.

Didn't see your named choice, and pretty sure holes could be picked in any hypothetical appointment of Gardner Spiers or an unknown-to-most guy coming in from Ireland. Could pick holes in any appointment. We simply aren't going to see Jose Mourinho or Pep Guardiola in the frame for the St Mirren job.

Murray got it. He deserves a chance - with his new squad. Just as Danny Lennon deserved a chance when he was the new guy, coming into a club he saw as a step up from where we took him from. What Ian Murray does not deserve is to be booted in the stones by internet blowhards before he's even had time to put a knot in his club tie and find his way to the coffee machine at Ralston.

Edited by pozbaird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

StuartD.Please enlighten me I do not believe Sons have a Youth Acadamy or run a reserve team.Moreover they only train two nights per week and are totally part time.So how was he in a position to promote youth.Time for everyone who is a Buddie to get behind the team.COYS.

Given what you state above, why was he selected for a job that stipulates he has to have proven experience of working with and promoting youth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is 34 ffs. He has had 2 seasons in management and I would bet the Dumbarton Board had one key aim, keep them in the Championship. He has achieved that. Eddie Howe at Bournemouth had no track record and look what he did at that club. McIntyre had no track record but kept RC up.

Eddie Howe had an excellent track record in his first stint for bournemouth, McIntyre had an excellent record at QoS which included cup finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got relegated by a distance this season. That's much worse than Murray's worst ever season as a manager!

There either is talent in the Dumbarton youth ranks, or there is not. I suspect strongly that there were no players good enough to step up from their youth set-up, given it's a small part-time club punching way above its weight. At St Mirren, there are young players good enough for the Championship - let's see what he does with them.

So why has he been appointed to a position where working with youth is key, if he has no experience or track record in that field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why has he been appointed to a position where working with youth is key, if he has no experience or track record in that field?

I would guess he was appointed because he did well at his interview, knows he won't get, and wouldn't expect, a big budget to spend his way to success, and showed enough with Dumbarton to make our BoD think he's a young manager on the way up, ready for a step up to a full time club.

Pure guesswork on my part, but I bet it ain't a million miles from the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted a name on the thread earlier. My intention was to add the name of someone who hadn't previously been mentioned and someone who had a track record of success with youth development. I named Gardner Speirs. I'd also mentioned Pat Kenny as a manager who continues to be extremely successful in Ireland.

I could have understood appointments like Adams or Reid. I don't think they would have had me rushing out for a season ticket but I would have understood that the club were trying to make an appointment that would put the club in the promotion mix. With Murray I honestly can't see what the intention is though. He's not been successful in any way at all and he's not got a record of youth development. He doesn't even have a great record as a coach throughout the Scottish game.

Maybe neither of them applied for the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought amongst most who comment on here and saints fans in general there was a real desire to not repeat the mistakes of the past in appointing a manager who before taking up the reins a casual observer could see would be out of their depth, destined to fail and frankly let down by those who appointed him, in that it wasn't in the individuals best interest to be given an aim and objectives that their performance to date indicated they would at best struggle, or indeed be unlikely to achieve.

He's got the job, he tried for several others unsuccessfully so good luck to him! But why are we yet again doing the same thing and hoping for a different result? Is the clubs real aim to avoid relegation from the championship, if not what is that apparently no one can see, or identify that makes Ian Murray the best man for the job! I will listen, digest anything, anyone can provide that indicates he has what we need.

To date the only achievement or performance related measure offered is he didn't get relegated. Maybe i seem unrealistic, out of touch, or missing the big picture but I don't see that measure as an indicator of a manager who is tasked with getting us back up at the first attempt. Help me out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some amount of uneducated bollocks in this thread (and that's ignoring Lord Pityme's rambling).

Ian Murray's record at Dumbarton sees him as being their most successful manager in the last 25 years, probably since we last met them on League duty.

He's worked on the lowest budget in the Championship by a distance, one which couldn't be bolstered by away crowds due to stadium size (unlike the other part-time sides), and has tried to implement a number of 'full-time' aspects to a part time club.

I know a few Sons fans, and while they admit he has limitations, and can be naive tactically, his side from 2013/14 played some of the best football they've seen. Remember they finished 5th, 4 points off the playoffs, and out-scored all but Hamilton (who were boosted by playing Mor10n on the last day).

To me, this is the appointment we should've made a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some amount of uneducated bollocks in this thread (and that's ignoring Lord Pityme's rambling).

Ian Murray's record at Dumbarton sees him as being their most successful manager in the last 25 years, probably since we last met them on League duty.

He's worked on the lowest budget in the Championship by a distance, one which couldn't be bolstered by away crowds due to stadium size (unlike the other part-time sides), and has tried to implement a number of 'full-time' aspects to a part time club.

I know a few Sons fans, and while they admit he has limitations, and can be naive tactically, his side from 2013/14 played some of the best football they've seen. Remember they finished 5th, 4 points off the playoffs, and out-scored all but Hamilton (who were boosted by playing Mor10n on the last day).

To me, this is the appointment we should've made a year ago.

"Limited" and "tactically naive".... Welcome to The FeegieDome Ian, you have exactly what we look for in a manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably the reason Murray didn't "promote youth" was because the youth players at Dumbarton were rubbish. MacPherson used to get the same shite on here, depite the fact he was only too happy to play youth if they were good enough. Just so happened guys like Sean Burns or whoever were rubbish.

I'm sure with most of our best remaining players right now being products of the youth team, Murray isn't planning on punting them all. I think Mallon et all will be regular fixtures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting line about wanting to go on to higher things in football. It's been pointed out before, but it would be nice to see St Mirren NOT being the end of the road for a football manager's career progression.

Got to back to the 80s to find a manager who left us for a bigger club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe neither of them applied for the job.

True Jake. I suggested them because they weren't in the list of usual names when I thought their record should have put them in the frame. However at the very least any St Mirren fan should have been looking for direction. Reid or Adam would have signalled the board were going to push for top 4 with managers who've done the route before. Whilst the likes of Stark or Frail would have suggested the heavy focus on youth development. This is just another uninspired appointment from a rudderless board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought amongst most who comment on here and saints fans in general there was a real desire to not repeat the mistakes of the past in appointing a manager who before taking up the reins a casual observer could see would be out of their depth, destined to fail and frankly let down by those who appointed him, in that it wasn't in the individuals best interest to be given an aim and objectives that their performance to date indicated they would at best struggle, or indeed be unlikely to achieve.

He's got the job, he tried for several others unsuccessfully so good luck to him! But why are we yet again doing the same thing and hoping for a different result? Is the clubs real aim to avoid relegation from the championship, if not what is that apparently no one can see, or identify that makes Ian Murray the best man for the job! I will listen, digest anything, anyone can provide that indicates he has what we need.

To date the only achievement or performance related measure offered is he didn't get relegated. Maybe i seem unrealistic, out of touch, or missing the big picture but I don't see that measure as an indicator of a manager who is tasked with getting us back up at the first attempt. Help me out here.

Why not take a step back mate and get on with supporting the club and its new manager. We all want success for St Mirren Murray is the manager a ball has not even been kicked. He will rebuild the team at least give him the time to open the door to the office.

Edited by Isle Of Bute Saint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...