salmonbuddie Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 A long one, preferably. Somewhere with no internet would be very, very, relaxing. And good for you. And by "you" I mean us, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barney Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 Well funnily enough the number of asylum seekers coming to the UK from Iraq has fallen through the floor since Hussain was removed from power so that would suggest the populous of Iraq feel a damn sight safer than they did when Hussain was gassing them in the hills Is that the same gas and weapons of mass destruction that was found when britain and america undertook their invasion of iraq? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barney Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 You are wrong. The motion put to the House of Commons was for UK troops to be involved in military action in Syria. There was no proposal to arm the rebels, we were simply going to intervene to enforce International Law and to stop Assad from using Chemical Weapons on his own people. It was the socialists and the nationalists who demanded that we take no action and that we let those atrocities carry on. Now the nationalists and the socialists believe they have a solution. Somehow we're going to migrate as many of the 22.8m Syrians from there homes and the country they love and we're going to force them to set up home somewhere in Europe where they don't want to be. And somehow Cameron is the bad guy? Wankers! isis emerged from the illegal invasion of iraq and were armed by america to aid them in the struggle against assad. Also, Iraq were armed and trained by america during the war with iran. The foreign policy you support is flawed to the core. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 You're right, it goes back a long time. Personally, I blame that Lawrence of Arabia cnut for starting it.Naw, he was OK as he was British empire building.British empire good, other empires bad is, or rather was the rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 You're right, it goes back a long time. Personally, I blame that Lawrence of Arabia cnut for starting it. The last caliphate in the area was the Ottoman Empire. It fell apart during the first world war and the second world war got in the way of a lot of what was going to be implemented by the winners of that war. What we are seeing now is the various factions sorting it out once and for all. Bloodily. Let them deal with it. The jews got their particular patch of ground in 48, previously, they had lived all across the Middle East but were forced out. The same thing is happening to Yazidis, sunnis shias Coptics etc etc. In short, the place is a f**king mess. But its their mess to sort out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2714833/Reyaad-Khan-British-jihadist-Syria-tried-war-crimes-jailed-life-using-Twitter-brazenly-boast-role-execution-prisoners.html This is the sort of person that we need to jump through several hoops to protect his rights Frankly, the fact that he's now spread across the desert like a dropped trifle is the best outcome for all concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 Yeah, I, erm, wasn't being serious you know. There are plenty that have no clue about the area though. I'll exempt you then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 Isn't it interesting that Stud has stopped using "natsi" since babykillergate and instead references "socialists and nationalists" instead. I like how he cleverly switches them around now and again, too. And when I say"cleverly"..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosferatu Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 Yeah, I, erm, wasn't being serious you know. Were you just joking about the public debt as well? #thichasfcuk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 #thichasfcuk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted October 13, 2015 Report Share Posted October 13, 2015 (edited) Strange eh? Putin starts launching cruise missiles and regular bombing raids on Syria and there's not one word of criticism from the Natsi appeasement brigade. Apparently it's only Britain that is bad Edited October 13, 2015 by Stuart Dickson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted October 13, 2015 Report Share Posted October 13, 2015 Strange eh? Putin starts launching cruise missiles and regular bombing raids on Syria and there's not one word of criticism from the Natsi appeasement brigade. Apparently it's only Britain that is bad Dont live in, or vote in Russia.... Its up to their people to decide what type of war mongering tyrant they want.... We've got our own trigger happy tory to worry about..! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted October 13, 2015 Report Share Posted October 13, 2015 (edited) Dont live in, or vote in Russia.... Its up to their people to decide what type of war mongering tyrant they want.... We've got our own trigger happy tory to worry about..!Nah that doesn't cut it. Several of the forum Quisling Appeasniks were hugely critical of US action in Syria yet they stay strangely quiet when Putin defies NATO and gets involved. Putin reckless action has caused some expert political commentators to suggest we could be just one error on the battlefield away from World War III yet it passes without a word of criticism from the types that would have us face up to Russia nuclear threat arming our troops with nothing more than bagpipes. Edited October 13, 2015 by Stuart Dickson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted October 13, 2015 Report Share Posted October 13, 2015 Nah that doesn't cut it. Several of the forum Quisling Appeasniks were hugely critical of US action in Syria yet they stay strangely quiet when Putin defies NATO and gets involved. Putin reckless action has caused some expert political commentators to suggest we could be just one error on the battlefield away from World War III yet it passes without a word of criticism from the types that would have us face up to Russia nuclear threat arming our troops with nothing more than bagpipes. Yeah the west's bombing of innocents, and people they dont really know why they are bombing is all considered..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted October 13, 2015 Report Share Posted October 13, 2015 Yeah the west's bombing of innocents, and people they dont really know why they are bombing is all considered..? And Putin firing cruise missiles that miss Syria and hit Iran is considered and beyond criticism? The Russians have a history that is just as imperialistic as the UK yet strangely the Natsis have lost their voice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted October 13, 2015 Report Share Posted October 13, 2015 (edited) And Putin firing cruise missiles that miss Syria and hit Iran is considered and beyond criticism? The Russians have a history that is just as imperialistic as the UK yet strangely the Natsis have lost their voice. This thread was started by shull to celebrate the deaths of two British citizens who'd gone to Syria to join the fighting and been killed, it was a two day wonder until it was revived by you after a gap of a month, your motive doing so is odious, your argument irrelevant, your language abusive and until you're able to behave in a decent manner that's all I've got to say on the matter. Edited October 13, 2015 by Bud the Baker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted October 13, 2015 Report Share Posted October 13, 2015 This thread was started by shull to celebrate the deaths of two British citizens who'd gone to Syria to join the fighting and been killed, it was a two day wonder until it was revived by you after a gap of a month, your motive doing so is odious, your argument irrelevant, your language abusive and until you're able to behave in a decent manner that's all I've got to say on the matter. No surprise that you don't want to debate it. It's far easier to fake scorn and repulsion over some words than it is to defend the lack of a Nationalist voice of condemnation when the actions of Putin are putting Scottish pilots lives at risk. Why highlight the fact that Natsi policy would have us abandon the very nuclear deterrent that has held Russia at bay for 70 years so our unarmed Scottish Navy can sail out in fishing boats to wave the white flag? Just like in the 1930's the core of the Natsi party is positioning itself to collude with one of the most anti-democratic forces in the world in the hope that one day they can hold on to some element of power in a Vichyesque type government held totally accountable by an autocratic dictatorship. "Fighting for Scotland" my arse! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 I'm convinced, I'll be voting Tory in the next election, it's the only thing that will stop Putin invading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 You need a smoothie. To stop Putin? We've got StuD, he's a smoothie, you can tell by the way he's convinced so many of us we're wrong. About everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 And Putin firing cruise missiles that miss Syria and hit Iran is considered and beyond criticism? The Russians have a history that is just as imperialistic as the UK yet strangely the Natsis have lost their voice. Cameron and Putin.... Funny how you never see them together..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.