Seaside Nipper Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 Jist saying like.............could well be in some folk's thinking and might just be what is required should we remain in nowheresville much longer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 Jist saying like.............could well be in some folk's thinking and might just be what is required should we remain in nowheresville much longer I see no purpose, whatsoever, in giving Thompson a prominent coaching position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 Haw! Ye cannae go startin threids withoot Murrays name in the title. It's a rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 (edited) Get Thomo out of love st. He has been useless for the last 18 months while still taking a handsome wage. He has been a good servant, but he is now a burden! (Suspect that is why he is on the subs bench and not getting a game) Can we not learn the lessons of the past where we promoted inexperienced folk into coaching/management roles? Our past record is not even poor, its cra*p Miller either stays as coach and a decent manager is employed or steps up and a good coach is brought in, or we sign a competent duo - no more penny pinching disasters please. But the investment has to be put into better players too. This squad does not create or score enough goals - funny thing is, it is goals that bring home the points. Strikers like Gallacher and Shankland are still learning their trade - they are players from other clubs, it is little advantage to us to develop them for other clubs in future - Remember Rory Loy - he was not good enough for us when we had him - Falkirk and Dundee are the ones who have benefited. Good teams have 4 strikers that all can score goals - 2 that get double figures at least and 2 that push them for their places. Who we got?????? A couple of boys and a has-been. Edited December 4, 2015 by Sweeper07 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 Get Thomo out of love st. He has been useless for the last 18 months while still taking a handsome wage. He has been a good servant, but he is now a burden! (Suspect that is why he is on the subs bench and not getting a game) Can we not learn the lessons of the past where we promoted inexperienced folk into coaching/management roles? Our past record is not even poor, its cra*p Miller either stays as coach and a decent manager is employed or steps up and a good coach is brought in, or we sign a competent duo - no more penny pinching disasters please. But the investment has to be put into better players too. This squad does not create or score enough goals - funny thing is, it is goals that bring home the points. Strikers like Gallacher and Shankland are still learning their trade - they are players from other clubs, it is little advantage to us to develop them for other clubs in future - Remember Rory Loy - he was not good enough for us when we had him - Falkirk and Dundee are the ones who have benefited. Good teams have 4 strikers that call all score goals - 2 that get double figures at least and 2 that push them for their places. Who we got?????? A couple of boys and a has-been. Sweeping statement there sweeper. Of course Thommo can do a job, he is not past it, but our present tactics are woeful and he doesn't get ball to feet. Murray would make a better rugby coach kicking for lines and space where none of our players are.But no don't want him coaching, anyway I see his career in media Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 (edited) Strikers like Gallacher and Shankland are still learning their trade - they are players from other clubs, it is little advantage to us to develop them for other clubs in future - Remember Rory Loy - he was not good enough for us when we had him - Falkirk and Dundee are the ones who have benefited. There's me thinking Gallacher was our player. Besides, we developed McLean, McGinn, etc etc for other clubs with little advantage. Edited November 25, 2015 by pod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapamythighs Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 Haw! Ye cannae go startin threids withoot Murrays name in the title. It's a rule. miller,thompson and murray...........hmmmm,,,sounds like a very bad law firm to me............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddymarvellous Posted November 25, 2015 Report Share Posted November 25, 2015 This isnae a rumour its speculation - please post in thr right area and don't get me all heat up... ( should it be het up?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErnieT Posted November 26, 2015 Report Share Posted November 26, 2015 Our management duo really are Smithers and Montgomery Burns! I'm sick to the back teeth of Murray, totally inept in all departments with the exception of hand clapping on the touchline. Strategy, formation, personnel, media conferences, leadership, morale.....all alien to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saltcoatsbuddie Posted November 27, 2015 Report Share Posted November 27, 2015 as for millar ,I am struggling to see what difference he has made ,we are still as shit as we were before he came Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted November 30, 2015 Report Share Posted November 30, 2015 There's me thinking Gallacher was our player. Besides, we developed McLean, McGinn, etc etc for other clubs with little advantage. What about the 1/2 a million £ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isle Of Bute Saint Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 Would go for Thompson have no problem about him pulling us out of this mess though would be happy to see the Ayr manager installed . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 Thomson Simply no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mad saint 2 Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 sorry not up to playing for 1st team legs gone no way should he be considered for manager,we need experience, and a total rebuild off team for next seasons promotion campaign thommo does not fit into this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Singapore Saint Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 I wonder if Thommo is actually part of the dressing room problems we keep hearing about.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendo Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 I wonder if Thommo is actually part of the dressing room problems we keep hearing about.... Not sure what is meant by dressing room problems. Over the last couple of years, we are all agreed we have managers who have not been up to the job. Should senior pros not be obliged to give their views and express dissent when they are being managed by eejits, without being told they are undermining the boss? I have no idea whether thommo has voiced his opinions and this has caused tension, but if he has perhaps he has just become frustrated at being managed by people not very good at their jobs. Perhaps thommo constantly being passed over for a coaching role indicates the real tension is between him and the BOD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 I wonder if Thommo is actually part of the dressing room problems we keep hearing about.... I would say he is. He spat the dummy last season after being over looked for a coaching job. He is as much a wage thief as Gow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 Perhaps thommo constantly being passed over for a coaching role indicates the real tension is between him and the BOD. who sanctioned his new contract after all the problems? Come on, he is in with the bricks. The BoD should always have supported their appointees unless gross misconduct (ring any bells) or poor results made it untenable to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
religion is saints Posted December 15, 2015 Report Share Posted December 15, 2015 I would say he is. He spat the dummy last season after being over looked for a coaching job. He is as much a wage thief as Gow.think your right, his attitude looks all wrong and have had a feeling for a while he's big part of problems...time for him to leave if that's the case... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.