Jump to content

Billy Mehmet


billymehmet1

Recommended Posts


Good shout!

But he's going to RC Montevideo... unless it's December Fool's day... unsure.png

http://www.goal.com/en/news/11/transfer-zone/2015/12/28/18781062/uruguayan-club-announce-ronaldinho-deal

Social media went into meltdown after Racing Club de Montevideo claimed to have completed a move for the Brazil icon - but there's a huge snag...

........St.Mirren's on the radar. whistling.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mehmet signs it would be going from bad to worse, honking footballer..

Memhet was our top scorer for 3 consecutive years in the SPL so he is a whole lot f**king better than the imposters that currently wear the stripes.

why is Sutton not getting a game at his current club and why does Mehmet not have a club then?

Sutton has played 10 times for the Fakes this season with his last start only two weeks ago against Partick Thistle.

Mehmet only returned to the UK at the beginning of Dec at the end of the season in Malaysia and being away from the UK for 5 years. He scored 23 goals in his last 26 games in their SuperLeague. He has only been home for 4 weeks and you are complaining he does not have a club and he does not deserve an end-of-season break? Mehmet has stated that he has several offers on the table but was taking a short holiday. He will have a club in January ok. Just pray that it is us.

Edited by Sonny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TPAFKATS

Hahahahaha. Both Sutton and Billy would be a one hundred percent improvement on our current strikers. They are Gallagher who is a runner only and Shankland who can't run or close down but has a decent shot.

This description sounds similar to Mehmet and sutton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sutton scored plenty for us but remember he had Simon Lappin, the best crosser of a ball we have ever had feeding him with his left peg. The big issue right now is the lack of service to the strikers. Shankland is continually pulled out the box looking for the ball and the chances fall to the non striker Gallagher. If Mehmets is still as fit his graft would be a plus.

Edited by Bobbyreid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sutton scored plenty for us but remember he had Simon Lappin, the best crosser of a ball we have ever had feeding him with his left peg. The big issue right now is the lack of service to the strikers. Shankland is continually pulled out the box looking for the ball and the chances fall to the non striker Gallagher. If Mehmets is still as fit his graft would be a plus.

Jim Gardner ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scanlon was a great player, and I don't remember him ever missing a penalty for us.

The crossing comment is interesting because someone at Aberdeen was talking about the swapping of Scanlon for Weir, and was commenting that Scanlon would twist and turn, beat a defender but would often not put in the cross when the forwards were expecting it. The strikers found it difficult to make runs because they never knew when the ball would come in. Whereas Weir was more of a runner, would beat a man and play an early cross which suited strikers like McGhee, Black etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sutton scored plenty for us but remember he had Simon Lappin, the best crosser of a ball we have ever had feeding him with his left peg. The big issue right now is the lack of service to the strikers. Shankland is continually pulled out the box looking for the ball and the chances fall to the non striker Gallagher. If Mehmets is still as fit his graft would be a plus.

simon lappin...lol...utter gash player as well...lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scanlon was a great player, and I don't remember him ever missing a penalty for us.

The crossing comment is interesting because someone at Aberdeen was talking about the swapping of Scanlon for Weir, and was commenting that Scanlon would twist and turn, beat a defender but would often not put in the cross when the forwards were expecting it. The strikers found it difficult to make runs because they never knew when the ball would come in. Whereas Weir was more of a runner, would beat a man and play an early cross which suited strikers like McGhee, Black etc.

Quite right. Scan loved to beat his man 3 times before he put in a cross!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...