Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 This is about continued abusive language by Stuart Dickson. It's been deemed unacceptable even by the Scottish Conservatives so why does he get away with it here. I've made numerous complaints to the moderators but they just seem to ignore it. Now I've no intention of storming off in the huff and I don't see why I should go to the bother of putting SD on ignore - he should not be allowed to post offensive language and apologize for the numerous past offences or else be banned from the site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidg Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 I don't see the big deal, I'm a yes voter and not offended. If Div has a problem or there are legal issues then I'm sure he will deal with it accordingly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 I don't see the big deal, I'm a yes voter and not offended. If Div has a problem or there are legal issues then I'm sure he will deal with it accordingly. Well I am and that is the point. Show me where else it is deemed acceptable language. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Guys stop giving this saddo publicity, who cares what the wee Dick gets up to . Posting crap at stupid oclock every night. He is sad and lonely and its just to get a rise that he, spouts crap. If Dick says the SNP were Jimmy SAville I would not take offence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 OMG Who postit that offensive word in the Title? Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) OMG Who postit that offensive word in the Title? Lol It's about the context in which it's used so you can go back to sitting at the back of the bus and sniggering with the big boys. I'll open the challenge to you - show me somewhere that it would be deemed acceptable language. Edited February 19, 2016 by Bud the Baker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidg Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Well I am and that is the point. Show me where else it is deemed acceptable language. You're seriously offended by the use of Natsis? Oh you poor baby.... Want a cuddle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 This is about continued abusive language by Stuart Dickson. It's been deemed unacceptable even by the Scottish Conservatives so why does he get away with it here. I've made numerous complaints to the moderators but they just seem to ignore it. Now I've no intention of storming off in the huff and I don't see why I should go to the bother of putting SD on ignore - he should not be allowed to post offensive language and apologize for the numerous past offences or else be banned from the site. I voted yes and I also have voted SNP all my days. However my mummy taught me that, "Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me". Man up FFS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 You're seriously offended by the use of Natsis? Oh you poor baby.... Want a cuddle? Yes please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 This is about continued abusive language by Stuart Dickson. It's been deemed unacceptable even by the Scottish Conservatives so why does he get away with it here. I've made numerous complaints to the moderators but they just seem to ignore it. Now I've no intention of storming off in the huff and I don't see why I should go to the bother of putting SD on ignore - he should not be allowed to post offensive language and apologize for the numerous past offences or else be banned from the site. A reasonable person would have said "Fair enough, I meant it as a bit of a joke and I've had my fun, I'll bow out". The problem is that Dickson isn't a reasonable person. We've tried to get him to stop and to reason with him but he's not interested. The man is a grade A c**t. Be grateful you don't have to have dealings with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) It's about the context in which it's used so you can go back to sitting at the back of the bus and sniggering with the big boys. I'll open the challenge to you - show me somewhere that it would be deemed acceptable language. Berlin 1945? Edited February 19, 2016 by DougJamie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 A reasonable person would have said "Fair enough, I meant it as a bit of a joke and I've had my fun, I'll bow out". The problem is that Dickson isn't a reasonable person. We've tried to get him to stop and to reason with him but he's not interested. The man is a grade A c**t. Be grateful you don't have to have dealings with him. Now that is personal abuse, whereas a reference to the SNP is only winding up dafties and trumpets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 You're seriously offended by the use of Natsis? Oh you poor baby.... Want a cuddle? Yeah it's offensive language and used in a deliberately offensive manner. I'll repeat my challenge and open it to anyone else who cares - show me anywhere else it would be deemed acceptable. Does your argument amount to anything more than BAWA is a small obscure corner of the internet and nobody else is bothered? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) Now that is personal abuse, whereas a reference to the SNP is only winding up dafties and trumpets. Yep I'd agree with that. Edited February 19, 2016 by oaksoft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Yep I'd agree with that. So are you a dafty or a trumpet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Now that is personal abuse, whereas a reference to the SNP is only winding up dafties and trumpets. In a post condemning personal abuse you resort to......., um personal abuse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 In a post condemning personal abuse you resort to......., um personal abuse. Who did I personally abuse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) So are you a dafty or a trumpet?Baith. ????(A one word post, I'm on fire ????) Edited February 19, 2016 by faraway saint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Who did I personally abuse? The people you referred to as "dafties and trumpets"! Now that doesn't bother me - who else but a daftie and a trumpet would have racked up 8000 posts on this site but I maintain that calling SNP supporters "Natsis" is unacceptable language. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidg Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 I maintain that calling SNP supporters "Natsis" is unacceptable language. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) Why? Because the Nazi party carried out genocidal programs on Jews, Gypsies and disabled people amongst others and SD is trying to imply that the SNP and people who vote SNP are inclined to intolerance because of the similarity in nomenclature. Like I've said it was deemed unacceptable by Ruth Davidson, the leader of the Scottish Conservative party during the referendum. Now, can you show me where else the usage would be deemed acceptable? ********************** You could have done the right thing and sorted it quietly but by not even answering me I've had to bring it up publically and you've been reduced to defending the indefensible. Edited February 19, 2016 by Bud the Baker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Because the Nazi party carried out genocidal programs on Jews, Gypsies and disabled people amongst others and SD is trying to imply that the SNP and people who vote SNP are likewise inclined because of the similarity in nomenclature . Like I've said it was deemed unacceptable by Ruth Davidson, the leader of the Scottish Conservative party during the referendum. Now, can you show me where else the usage would be deemed acceptable? Oh come on, I think your taking this too literally. We all know what the Nazis did, but its also a loose meaning of control freaks. The Tories on here have been described as fascists and some of them have colorful pasts. Plus its Stuart Dickson, who is a wind up, or seriously (allegedly) deranged. Let it go................. We have a massive game tomorrow and we need positive vibes and flowers and peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) I believe in free speech, but with free speech comes responsibility. Take for instance this company's policy So say an employee was spouting off supposed facts about the company's customers. How do you think that company would react? Erm the details about Tesco and M&S energy savings were sourced from their corporate websites. Still it's interesting that you once again adopt the tactic of the Natsi, attempting to bully and threaten your opponents into silence. Edited February 19, 2016 by Stuart Dickson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Was trying to be prudent Cockles...... the guy is a w@nker!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Oh come on, I think your taking this too literally. We all know what the Nazis did, but its also a loose meaning of control freaks. The Tories on here have been described as fascists and some of them have colorful pasts. Plus its Stuart Dickson, who is a wind up, or seriously (allegedly) deranged. Let it go................. We have a massive game tomorrow and we need positive vibes and flowers and peace Well I don't think Nazi/Natsi/control freak are interchangeable. I've never called anyone a Fascist just for supporting the Conservative party and I would regard it as over the top and unacceptable. On the one hand I'm well aware of SD's motives and that to an extent I'm playing into his hands but now that I've raised the topic I'm not going to let it lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.