beyond our ken Posted November 16, 2016 Report Share Posted November 16, 2016 29 minutes ago, Isle Of Bute Saint said: I just feel so disappointed that Gordon can not put a quick fix on this. However I would love to know what pressure the Police have on this subject. Can anyone tell me if this has to do with the law on football the SNP passed through parliament? I very much doubt it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Posted November 16, 2016 Report Share Posted November 16, 2016 I may be wrong but I believe a resolution to this type of matter is not solely at the discretion of SMFC. The Police and more importantly the SPFL have, I believe, policies which the Club would have to challenge. And I do agree that a public forum is not appropriate to discuss a legal matter as few if any on here even know the full story from all parties. The situation has been highlighted via this forum and several posters have all indicated a willingness to take the matter forward on behalf of the fan in question. The rest of us will have to do something else until a definite answer is forthcoming. And B&WArmy may be 'home' to some of us but from my experience it is very much a minority. None of my mates nor those that sit around me in the stadium post on here. Maybe an official conduit has to be implemented for formal communication between the fans and the Club but at the moment it is not obvious what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepé Le Pew Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 (edited) I think I have a short term solution? Spoiler Edited November 17, 2016 by Pepé Le Pew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E=Mc2 Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 I haven't read all the posts, but if the ban was a result of a letter sent to the club then surely the person affected should be entitled to a copy of that letter, and be in a position challenge the contents of that letter if the contents of that letter led the club to ban the person.Perhaps the person concerned should ask under the freedom of information act to have sight of a document that led to his civil liberties being infringed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santaponsasaint Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 I think the matter has been resolved. Josh will be at the game on Saturday if he wants. but he will never get the special moment back of watching his nephew make his home debut. for that reason I think police and Saints have made a mess of a nothing matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munoz Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 3 hours ago, santaponsasaint said: I think the matter has been resolved. Josh will be at the game on Saturday if he wants. but he will never get the special moment back of watching his nephew make his home debut. for that reason I think police and Saints have made a mess of a nothing matter. That's good news if true . About time . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northendsaint Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 6 hours ago, santaponsasaint said: I think the matter has been resolved. Josh will be at the game on Saturday if he wants. but he will never get the special moment back of watching his nephew make his home debut. for that reason I think police and Saints have made a mess of a nothing matter. The matter is indeed resolved.Lessons have been learned and its time to move on.Lets get 3 points on the board on Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud Bundy Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 13/11/2016 at 11:34 AM, shull said: Can somebody actually tell us the truth in what happened before some supporters become martyrs? Trial set for 4th April 2017. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSS Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munoz Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 1 hour ago, HSS said: That's good to see . Its not like the police lie , eh ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suggestion Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 9 months later, thousands of pounds of tax payers money wasted from police, procurator fiscal and court. Made out to be a criminal by certain people at club before a trail all to please the police, banned from going to see st mirren at home. Name tarred with club / police. 3 days off unpaid to attend court, lawyers fees. Not guilty. What a waste of time and money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 20 minutes ago, Suggestion said: 9 months later, thousands of pounds of tax payers money wasted from police, procurator fiscal and court. Made out to be a criminal by certain people at club before a trail all to please the police, banned from going to see st mirren at home. Name tarred with club / police. 3 days off unpaid to attend court, lawyers fees. Not guilty. What a waste of time and money Take it out on the Drum on Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 25 minutes ago, Suggestion said: 9 months later, thousands of pounds of tax payers money wasted from police, procurator fiscal and court. Made out to be a criminal by certain people at club before a trail all to please the police, banned from going to see st mirren at home. Name tarred with club / police. 3 days off unpaid to attend court, lawyers fees. Not guilty. What a waste of time and money Sorry but wasn't he fined and warned about his future behaviour. Why would the court do that if he was found not guilty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 4 minutes ago, Kendo said: Sorry but wasn't he fined and warned about his future behaviour. Why would the court do that if he was found not guilty? The person who invaded the pitch was, but the other guy walked/ran/danced free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 Just now, FTOF said: The person who invaded the pitch was, but the other guy walked/ran/danced free. Cheers, I didn't understand that there were 2 people involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 1 minute ago, Kendo said: Cheers, I didn't understand that there were 2 people involved. " Co-accused " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 1 minute ago, shull said: " Co-accused " Yes I see that now I only read the top bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.