portmahomack saint Posted June 24, 2018 Report Share Posted June 24, 2018 (edited) Frank Lampard in for John McGinn, just had a call from Flarey Bob so the info is sound Edited June 24, 2018 by portmahomack saint s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gotti Posted June 24, 2018 Report Share Posted June 24, 2018 1 hour ago, Hambud said: The thing is its not like they have paid out a massive amount on him so they don't actually have a great amount to lose. He has gone there won a scottish cup, won promotion and would leave them an established top league team. If he goes next year for free what have they actually lost? If they sell him, between our 33% and whatever amount they need to pay elsewhere, are they going to be left with much change? Probably not. Is it really in their best interests to sell him or just get another year out of him. If Hibs can flog him for £2-3M they can't let that slip away. I just don't think there is that much money in Scottish football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munoz Posted June 24, 2018 Report Share Posted June 24, 2018 £3M bid from Derby supposedly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintargyll Posted June 24, 2018 Report Share Posted June 24, 2018 Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted June 24, 2018 Report Share Posted June 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, saintargyll said: Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M Fitzy reportingly wants 15m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted June 24, 2018 Report Share Posted June 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, saintargyll said: Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M Nothing less than £5m, but you can have him for nothing next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munoz Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 11 hours ago, pod said: Nothing less than £5m, but you can have him for nothing next season. Rumoured that Celtic are still favourite with a £2.7M bid plus Allan and Morgan on loan. Probably nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Monkey Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 1 hour ago, munoz said: Rumoured that Celtic are still favourite with a £2.7M bid plus Allan and Morgan on loan. Probably nonsense. So our portion of that would be about £900k, and Lewis Morgan on loan... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 Going to be a bidding war with a couple of Clubs interestit. Major windfall on it's way to Greenhill Road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 50 minutes ago, shull said: Going to be a bidding war with a couple of Clubs interestit. Major windfall on it's way to Greenhill Road. Might even be able to afford a new Goalie In all seriousness we do actually need another one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 12 minutes ago, DougJamie said: Might even be able to afford a new Goalie In all seriousness we do actually need another one Don't get him started. Spend it on a goal scorer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevo_smfc Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 14 hours ago, saintargyll said: Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M I know they were definitely quoted saying this in January, though surely his clubs valuation has dropped now he has 12 months left rather than 18. I do believe however a minimum £3m is what they will entertain. Whether that's plus a player exchange or not who knows, could depends on a bidding war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 15 hours ago, DougJamie said: Fitzy reportingly wants 15m And Buffon as second choice goalkeeper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, St.Ricky said: And Buffon as second choice goalkeeper. We already have Buffoon as our Goalie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanleySaint Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 and one of our highest number posters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isle Of Bute Saint Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 Hibs chairman at their AGM has said McGinn sell on clause is not 33% . Anyone know what it is ? A Hibs fan said it's 21%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munoz Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 34 minutes ago, Isle Of Bute Saint said: Hibs chairman at their AGM has said McGinn sell on clause is not 33% . Anyone know what it is ? A Hibs fan said it's 21%. Gilmour said 33% . Someone's telling porkies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MenstrieSaint Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 my understanding is , that its %30 of any transfer monies received over £100,000 , and we won,t be entitled to any further sell on fees , should meatball be transferred again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17/03/13 Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, MenstrieSaint said: my understanding is , that its %30 of any transfer monies received over £100,000 , and we won,t be entitled to any further sell on fees , should meatball be transferred again. This.....but its 33.3% Say he gets sold for £3m, our share should be 33.3% of £2.9m (£966,657) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soctty Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 I would think the clause is 33% of the fee received by Hibs - the way the vast majority of sell on clauses work. I have heard that Petrie claimed the clause was lower, but unless Gilmour has been economical with the truth, I'd assume he's just trying to appease his fans a little. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 IOBS, stop buying into the Hibs supporters on Pie and Bovril. It's a running joke from them that everytime a St Mirren fan mentions the sell on % they knock it down the way to get bites as they usually get so many. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LargsBud Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 Apparently he's not goingto Celtic. Which is great for us because they would definitely have done a deal which included Scott Allan and less cash. I've heard from a decent source its not them so hopefully it's a pure cash deal somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 4 hours ago, Isle Of Bute Saint said: Hibs chairman at their AGM has said McGinn sell on clause is not 33% . Anyone know what it is ? A Hibs fan said it's 21%. Well our chairmen at the time Mr Gilmour stood in a meeting and told everyone there myself included it was 33%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
div Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 Definitely 33% of any profit Hibs make. Believe they paid £120K for him, so if they sell for £4m we'd get a third of £3.88m give or take so our cut would be just under £1.3m. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.