Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Lord Pityme

So this is what a ban looks like!

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, helpmaboab said:

If I was Div I would just chuck offenders out completely.

His ball. His game. Go find your own ball and start your ain game.

EOS.

Trouble with this softly softly approach is people abuse it.

Other forums 3 strikes...

Strike 1 ....one week ban

Strike 2 ....one month ban

Strike 3.... suspended permanently

Simples.

You do realise you would be one of the first people banned you silly c**t 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, StuD said:

If you mean I have my own opinions and that I don't make gushing posts about a club that often frustrates me then aye I suppose so. 

However if by loose cannon you are referring to someone who often breaches the forum guidelines, in areas like threatening behaviour, abusive behaviour, trolling behaviour or racist behaviour then there are far looser cannons than me on this forum and I'd include the webmaster in that! 

 

You’ve been hanging around St.Mirren forums for over a decade now, and in that space of time I don’t recall you making a single positive post about ANYTHING to do with the club.

Negativity absolutely oozes out of you, and you consistently tell anyone who will listen that you aren’t a St.Mirren supporter.

So , the question would be, why the fuck are you here and why should we let you pollute our forums?

Your pal LPM pollutes the board with his constant negativity too, but at least I know he does actually care about St.Mirren.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You’ve been hanging around St.Mirren forums for over a decade now, and in that space of time I don’t recall you making a single positive post about ANYTHING to do with the club.
Negativity absolutely oozes out of you, and you consistently tell anyone who will listen that you aren’t a St.Mirren supporter.
So , the question would be, why the f**k are you here and why should we let you pollute our forums?
Your pal LPM pollutes the board with his constant negativity too, but at least I know he does actually care about St.Mirren.
You would think that someone who appears to have no friends in the real world (hence the imaginary dinner parties, etc) would want to make "friends" online when on, rather than just have an online mirror existence of reality. But, to each, their own. I think he just wants the attention - like a dog that thinks negative attention is better than no attention.

P.S. I see he has hunted out another one of my posts (above) to reply to. Attention seeking little twat that he is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, div said:

You’ve been hanging around St.Mirren forums for over a decade now, and in that space of time I don’t recall you making a single positive post about ANYTHING to do with the club.

Negativity absolutely oozes out of you, and you consistently tell anyone who will listen that you aren’t a St.Mirren supporter.

So , the question would be, why the f**k are you here and why should we let you pollute our forums?

Your pal LPM pollutes the board with his constant negativity too, but at least I know he does actually care about St.Mirren.

I make it two decades Div. Possibly even longer than you! What is obvious is that although I've still got all my faculties, you clearly have early onset dementia. I've made positive posts when they were merited, you've either forgotten them, or you've chosen to ignore them. 

I was a St Mirren supporter from 1978 to September 2003. From that point on I've been what I would describe as a "customer" as you well know. It's a statement of fact that during the last 15 years I have been to more St Mirren matches, both home and away, than many of your forum users here on BAWA. To say I don't care about the club, how it's run, and what it does is an absolute joke. The majority of the posts I make on here are a constant reference to just how much I do care and the fact that you perceive most of them to be negative is hardly a surprise since the way the club operates frequently disappoints me both on and off the park. Remember when I was a supporter St Mirren were often a top five club in Scotland competing regularly in Europe. There would be a ring of young supporters three or four deep stood round the perimeter of the pitch at Love Street.  The club had players that have become legendary amongst the fans. How many times have St Mirren qualified for Europe since? How many players over the last 15 years will be remembered as fondly as those players in the late 70's and 80's? And these days ofcourse the majority of the fans of the club appear to be middle aged or in their retirement with the majority of kids season tickets that the club sells hardly ever being used. 

Ban me if you want Div but if it's on the grounds of "not being a St Mirren supporter" or on the grounds of being "negative" about a club that consistently fails to meet it's potential then you are setting quite a dangerous precedent. For a start you'll need to start vetting new members to your forums. No more Sunderland, Barnsley or Ipswich fans. No more Chinese Web bots to boost your Google Analytics statistics. No more fans of opposition clubs. You'd need to ban Slartifartbast who never makes a football related post, never mind one about St Mirren. Pozbaird will need to go - he's way too negative about strip designs. And after every single defeat this season you'll need to have a huge cull of all the negative posters calling out poor performances, or bad managerial decisions as the bipolar element amongst the forum membership really kicks in. 

LPM is no "pal" of mines either. We didn't see eye to eye on the 10000Hours bid, we didn't see eye to eye on fan ownership and we've had many heated discussions on the forum that showed a chasm wider than the Atlantic Ocean between us. To say that LPM and me are "pals" is as absurd as claiming TsuMirren and me are "pals" - it's simply not a statement of fact and most observant people will have clocked that. That the one issue that appears to have brought us together - with all our knowledge and experience of fan ownership models - is our view on the way SMISA operates should be a concern for those who have obviously taken a far more passive interest. As should the fact that the one guy who keeps trying to censor criticism of anything SMISA related is one of the people who sat around the boardroom table in 2012 voting to keep a liquidated Rangers side in the top echelons of Scottish Football - despite what the majority of his customers were telling him on Pie and Bovril and on BAWA. 

I'm not sure you care about St Mirren or about Scottish Football, Div. All too often your actions suggest you care more about keeping Chairmen sweet at the club and keeping your leaky information channels open so you've got content for your websites. Perhaps you should put yourself in the SIn Bin! 

Edited by StuD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being critical of the club is absolutely fine and very welcome where it's constructive and reasoned.

You have an enormous chip on your shoulder about absolutely everything to do with the club and it's incredibly draining to read it every single day.

Fans are fans. We are all different, and will always have different opinions. That's why we have a forum.

The only thing that should be common amongst all of us is that we want the very best for the club. You don't want that though. You want to bitch and snipe and whine about every single thing the club does. It's tiresome and deeply irritating.

At times you come across as being a smart and reasonable guy. So start behaving like that all the time instead of an attention seeking brat and I'll be happy to let you continue to post on the website along with everyone else.

As for Stewart and Gordon, the former saved the club from going down the plughole, built us a new stadium, eradicated all debt from the club, oversaw almost a decade back in the top flight and won us a major trophy.

The latter has front loaded a project to deliver fan ownership and has delivered promotion in his first full season running the club.

Why wouldn't anyone with half a brain be supportive of those Chairmen?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, div said:

Being critical of the club is absolutely fine and very welcome where it's constructive and reasoned.

You have an enormous chip on your shoulder about absolutely everything to do with the club and it's incredibly draining to read it every single day.

Fans are fans. We are all different, and will always have different opinions. That's why we have a forum.

The only thing that should be common amongst all of us is that we want the very best for the club. You don't want that though. You want to bitch and snipe and whine about every single thing the club does. It's tiresome and deeply irritating.

At times you come across as being a smart and reasonable guy. So start behaving like that all the time instead of an attention seeking brat and I'll be happy to let you continue to post on the website along with everyone else.

As for Stewart and Gordon, the former saved the club from going down the plughole, built us a new stadium, eradicated all debt from the club, oversaw almost a decade back in the top flight and won us a major trophy.

The latter has front loaded a project to deliver fan ownership and has delivered promotion in his first full season running the club.

Why wouldn't anyone with half a brain be supportive of those Chairmen?

 

Have they knocked back invites to Stu's dinner parties?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, div said:

Being critical of the club is absolutely fine and very welcome where it's constructive and reasoned.

You have an enormous chip on your shoulder about absolutely everything to do with the club and it's incredibly draining to read it every single day.

Fans are fans. We are all different, and will always have different opinions. That's why we have a forum.

The only thing that should be common amongst all of us is that we want the very best for the club. You don't want that though. You want to bitch and snipe and whine about every single thing the club does. It's tiresome and deeply irritating.

At times you come across as being a smart and reasonable guy. So start behaving like that all the time instead of an attention seeking brat and I'll be happy to let you continue to post on the website along with everyone else.

As for Stewart and Gordon, the former saved the club from going down the plughole, built us a new stadium, eradicated all debt from the club, oversaw almost a decade back in the top flight and won us a major trophy.

The latter has front loaded a project to deliver fan ownership and has delivered promotion in his first full season running the club.

Why wouldn't anyone with half a brain be supportive of those Chairmen?

 

I've always been reasoned. I've made criticisms, explained why, and often put up suggestions to the alternative. Thats a fact Div. I'm seldom negative without reason. 

As for attention seeking who out of the two of us has a big advert that flashes up at every corner kick; appears on the radio: broadcasts matches on Periscope; Tweets about the "return of the Sin Bin"; or talks up the clubs then current manager to ridiculous extremes on other clubs websites to aid his move away? Want a clue? Its not me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, StuD said:

As for attention seeking who out of the two of us has a big advert that flashes up at every corner kick; appears on the radio: broadcasts matches on Periscope; Tweets about the "return of the Sin Bin"; or talks up the clubs then current manager to ridiculous extremes on other clubs websites to aid his move away? Want a clue? Its not me. 

Advertising my business is "attention seeking" :D

I get paid to appear on the radio.

I no longer broadcast matches on Periscope.

I use Twitter. Don't think I'm alone in that.

I get called my journalists from time to time as they get my number from the website. If you think Sunderland came in for Jack Ross purely on the basis that I said he was a decent manager then you're absolutely beyond help.

Enjoy the bin, my time here is done, I'm away back to talk to adults.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, div said:

Advertising my business is "attention seeking" :D

I get paid to appear on the radio.

I no longer broadcast matches on Periscope.

I use Twitter. Don't think I'm alone in that.

I get called my journalists from time to time as they get my number from the website. If you think Sunderland came in for Jack Ross because I said he was a decent manager then you're absolutely beyond help.

Ofcourse its attention seeking Div. You're about self promotion, not for the good pf the club, but for personal gain. Nothing wrong with that, but its more than a bit absurd to see one of the biggest attention seekers amongst the St Mirren support accuse anyone of being an attention seeker. Apart from anything else it shows a complete lack of personal awareness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, StuD said:

Ofcourse its attention seeking Div. You're about self promotion, not for the good pf the club, but for personal gain. Nothing wrong with that, but its more than a bit absurd to see one of the biggest attention seekers amongst the St Mirren support accuse anyone of being an attention seeker. Apart from anything else it shows a complete lack of personal awareness

I've done more for the good of the club than you ever have or ever will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, ReturnOf isma is god said:

You already know that doesn’t work I’m like herpes baby I just keep coming back 

I have buttons to press that say different. Want to play the game and see?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not very fair to ban StuD. 

Those who dislike him could easily have ignored him. 

But they don't because they are obsessed with StuD and slaver over every  contribution he made on here. 

What are they going to do now without StuD to bait because they have no original thoughts of their own. 

Slarti and the rest will be inconsolable. 

Serves them right. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not very fair to ban StuD. 
Those who dislike him could easily have ignored him. 
But they don't because they are obsessed with StuD and slaver over every  contribution he made on here. 
What are they going to do now without StuD to bait because they have no original thoughts of their own. 
Slarti and the rest will be inconsolable. 
Serves them right. 
I totally get where you're coming from, Shull. I really do. However Stuart's relentless negativity towards all things St Mirren was taking over threads and was impossible to ignore. I have to say I'm glad he's gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...