Jump to content

Saints In La Manga


Recommended Posts

We can only assess how much of a gamble each signing is if we know the same about each signing, and even then the assessment of how much of a gamble each signing will be is wholly dependent on our own individual opinions on each player.

It's perfectly reasonable for people to say Heaton is a huge gamble, but that opinion doesn't hold as much weight as the opinion of the manager who oversaw him for a five day intense trial, against 41 other players all busting a gut to impress. It's also reasonable to say Halkett is as much of a gamble given he's never played at Premiership level in Scotland, although this can be tempered by those who have seen him play over the four games we played against Livingston last season.

To sum up, the assessment of how much of a gamble each player will be is completely subjective, and will be different for each person, dependent on how much they know about a player, how much they have seen of the player, and how much they trust the manager's judgement. If Jack Ross had signed Heaton, many would be less nervous about the signing given Jack's record in the transfer market for the club.

Is it the weekend yet? :guinness

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

Indeed.

But we were never going to pay a transfer fee for an out of contract Halkett. 

£75k over 3 years is less than £500 per week. In comparison to a wage its nothing. Its trivial.

Its a gamble I'm happy to see us take rather than signing the same old never has beens / never will be's like Halkett!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zico said:

£75k over 3 years is less than £500 per week. In comparison to a wage its nothing. Its trivial.

Its a gamble I'm happy to see us take rather than signing the same old never has beens / never will be's like Halkett!

 

Could be suggested that Halkett's salary will be a good bit higher than Heaton's, him coming from the National League, but that's pure supposition with no evidence, as most of the variable in this conversation are...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Soctty said:

Could be suggested that Halkett's salary will be a good bit higher than Heaton's, him coming from the National League, but that's pure supposition with no evidence, as most of the variable in this conversation are...

I'd say that a £75k transfer fee (our biggest since Bosman) and a three year deal (when was the last one we handed out to a senior player?) would suggest otherwise, but that's just my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bud the Baker said:

I'd say that a £75k transfer fee (our biggest since Bosman) and a three year deal (when was the last one we handed out to a senior player?) would suggest otherwise, but that's just my guess.

Indeed -  a  guess on both our parts. £75k isn't a huge fee regardless of our business over the last 25 years or so, and wouldn't prompt me to think we're paying him a huge wedge. On the other hand, I'd imagine that, given the interest there would have bee in Halkett, Livi would have had to give him a sizeable pay rise.

But it's all pie in the sky. God I'll be pleased when the football starts again, and we can actually assess the player on performance rather than the paltry details we have to go on right now. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

On a player you've never seen in action! :P

But it doesn't matter if I've seen him in action! I'm not the manager! :P

Putting it into perspective, £500 per week is probably less than the wages we were paying either Kirkpatrick, Todd, Hilson or Stewart.

They were far bigger gambles!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Soctty said:

£75k isn't a huge fee regardless of our business over the last 25 years or so,

Indeed. And its probably less than the wages we spent on Kirkpatrick, Stewart, Todd, Hilson, Buchanan & Donati!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, zico said:

But it doesn't matter if I've seen him in action! I'm not the manager! :P

Putting it into perspective, £500 per week is probably less than the wages we were paying either Kirkpatrick, Todd, Hilson or Stewart.

They were far bigger gambles!

None of the above are/were on three year deals so £500 per week isn't an appropriate comparison.

******************************

These were the average top flight players wages last season according to the Daily Record (which have already been posted on the site) - so for Heaton's transfer fee we could have got an extra Bottom 6 standard player for what will be a tough season.

Quote

Celtic £14,135
Rangers £6,338
Aberdeen £2,623
Hearts £1,837
Hibs £1,676
Dundee £1,152
Thistle £1,119
Ross County £1,085
Killie £1,060
St Johnstone £923
Motherwell £820
Accies £798

 

Edited by Bud the Baker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

None of the above are/were on three year deals so £500 per week isn't an appropriate comparison.

******************************

These were the average top flight players wages last season according to the Daily Record - so for Heaton's transfer fee we could have got an extra Bottom 6 standard player for what will be a tough season.

 

No, but the combined wage for just the one season for that lot would have been more than £75k!

I'd rather we signed quality than stacking the squad with rubbish who don't play.

Those wages you've quoted will be for all staff employed by the club's, not just the players. Yet again, you've gone to a lot of effort to post something that is completely irrelevant!

If an extra £500 per week gets us a better quality of player than Kirkpatrick, Todd, Hilson, Stewart & Darryl Duffy then that will do for me!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, zico said:

No, but the combined wage for just the one season for that lot would have been more than £75k!

I'd rather we signed quality than stacking the squad with rubbish who don't play.

Those wages you've quoted will be for all staff employed by the club's, not just the players. Yet again, you've gone to a lot of effort to post something that is completely irrelevant!

If an extra £500 per week gets us a better quality of player than Kirkpatrick, Todd, Hilson, Stewart & Darryl Duffy then that will do for me!

 

 

Quote

 

The Parkhead club pays its first-team players an average wage of £717,860 per year, according to Sporting Intelligence's Global Sports Salaries Survey.

2016 - The Herald

WRONG!

We could easily get a Bottom 6 player for a year on the Heaton transfer fee.

Edited by Bud the Baker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

WRONG!

deary me, are you seriously quoting a newspaper, quoting a survey, quoting a report & accounts and using that as your evidence? !! :lol:

Posting wrong in big red letters regarding something you are wrong about is quality! :lol:

Celtic aren't a bottom 6 club either, so its irrelevant to your point! :lol:

Doubly irrelevant and doubly wrong!

Can you make it a treble? :lol:

 

Edited by zico
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, zico said:

deary me, are you seriously quoting a newspaper, quoting a survey, quoting a report & accounts and using that as your evidence? !! :lol:

Posting wrong in big red letters regarding something you are wrong about is quality! :lol:

Celtic aren't a bottom 6 club either, so its irrelevant to your point! :lol:

Doubly irrelevant and doubly wrong!

Can you make it a treble? :lol:

 

All you've offered comes from the inside of your troubled head! :lol:

As for the Celtic point - easily sorted!

Quote

7 Motherwell (£49,335)

8 Kilmarnock (£48,950)

9 Ross County (£47,515)

10 St Johnstone (£47,206)

11 Partick Thistle (£42,671)

12 Hamilton (£42,606)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

 

As for the Celtic point - easily sorted!

 

So you've now withdrawn your quote of a quote of a quote "evidence" that the figures aren't for all members of staff....

And then reposted the figures just for the bottom six.... even though they are irrelevant and wrong!

The treble is complete! :lol:

Anyways, I'd still rather we spent an extra £500 per week on someone the manager thinks will be quality rather than signing up the likes of Kirkpatrick, Stewart, Hilson, Todd & Darryl Duffy as you seem to favour! :lol:

Edited by zico
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zico said:

So you've now withdrawn your quote of a quote of a quote "evidence" that the figures aren't for all members of staff....

And then reposted the irrelevant and wrong figures just for the bottom six....

The treble is complete! :lol:

No, the Celtic figure came from the opening paragraph - the figures for the Bottom 6 came from a table at the bottom of the article.

Feel free to carry on with your ostrich impression.

****************

Bottom line is we could easily have got 2 proven Bottom 6 players on 2 year contracts for the money we're gambling on Heaton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

No, the Celtic figure came from the opening paragraph - the figures for the Bottom 6 came from a table at the bottom of the article.

Feel free to carry on with your ostrich impression.

****************

Bottom line is we could easily have got 2 proven Bottom 6 players on 2 year contracts for the money we're gambling on Heaton.

 

The Celtic figure is irrelevant, they are neither bottom 6 (which is what your point is about) nor is the figure just for their player's!

The line about it being the player's wages is a made up line that could have been made anywhere down the line of the quote of the quote of the quote!

"a proven bottom 6 player" = Andy Dow   :lol:

I'd rather we didn't gamble on signing 2 Andy Dows on 2 year contracts thank you!

The personal insults that you feel you need to add to every post you make just highlight that I'm right and you are wrong.

As always. :P

Edited by zico
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, Andy Dow had played for the likes of Chelsea, Dundee, Hibernian, Aberdeen & Motherwell and was still only 29 when he joined St. Mirren.

Based on BTB's logic, we could have made the assumption that Andy Dow would have been a raging success! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, zico said:

 

The Celtic figure is irrelevant, they are neither bottom 6 (which is what your point is about) nor is the figure just for their player's!

The line about it being the player's wages is a made up line that could have been made anywhere down the line of the quote of the quote of the quote!

"a proven bottom 6 player" = Andy Dow   :lol:

I'd rather we didn't gamble on signing 2 Andy Dows on 2 year contracts thank you!

The personal insults that you feel you need to add to every post you make just highlight that I'm right and you are wrong.

As always.  :P

As always - Mark Reid.  :P

 

What's a smiley if not a personal insult? :1eye 

I'm sure you used to criticize farawaysaint  for using them - or was that somebody else? :P

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

As always - Mark Reid.  :P

 

What's a smiley if not a personal insult? :1eye 

I'm sure you used to criticize farawaysaint  for using them - or was that somebody else? :P

 

 

You want us to sign a couple of Andy Dow's! :lol:

Don't think any smiley I've posted is a personal insult! Faraway used to fill his posts with smiley's cos he wasn't able to make his point. You just fill your posts with irrelevant and wrong numbers! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, zico said:

Indeed, Andy Dow had played for the likes of Chelsea, Dundee, Hibernian, Aberdeen & Motherwell and was still only 29 when he joined St. Mirren.

Based on BTB's logic, we could have made the assumption that Andy Dow would have been a raging success! :lol:

Andy Dow played 9 league games for Motherwell the season before we signed him - I would've questioned whether he was still a proven top flight player. :lol:

Edited by Bud the Baker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bud the Baker said:

Andy Dow played 9 games for Motherwell the season before we signed him - I would've questioned whether he was still a proven top flight player. :lol:

If he'd played every game then they he wouldn't have been joining us!

176 league games with Dundee, Chelsea, Hibs, Aberdeen & Motherwell and 29 years old.

THAT is exactly the type of player that you are advocating we sign on 2 year contracts!

No thanks!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, zico said:

If he'd played every game then they he wouldn't have been joining us! My Point.

176 league games with Dundee, Chelsea, Hibs, Aberdeen & Motherwell and 29 years old.

THAT is exactly the type of player that you are advocating we sign on 2 year contracts!

No thanks!  

No it's not.

Edited by Bud the Baker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...