buddies1877 Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 depending what is out there I wouldn’t mind getting rid of Cooke,Flynn and kellerman.I know a lot of fans are taking to Cooke but I just haven’t been impressed by him at all think he would end up in part time football if he stayed in Scotland after we release him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 (edited) 13 minutes ago, bazil85 said: I thought Flynn started well and his running looked decent, a few slack passes though. He might be away but the sub was likely tactical more than anything else. I think that's fair bazil but this happens more often than you might be entitled to expect from a player with his talent. He needs to impose himself more. The first 10 minutes was very open and we might have taken the lead early on.. But didn't. Edited January 21, 2019 by St.Ricky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TediousTom Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 37 minutes ago, St.Ricky said: When did Cole go and where has he gone too? 33 minutes ago, scam75 said: This morning and to f**k! I do believe that answers your question, answers it indeed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 Just now, TediousTom said: I do believe that answers your question, answers it indeed It did. It did indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 (edited) Another big payoff for Kpwenka, jeez the cash is fair flying oot the door. This board have f**ked up royally. casting my mind back to before the window opened, and people suggesting we might sign five or six new/loanees. Well i was wrong to think we wouldnt indeed bring that many in, but then again with SIXTEEN having gone out, and possibly a couple more to follow..? We need five or six just to get eleven on the feckin pitch! this has got to have been the most cash our board have jizzed away for many a year? Edited January 21, 2019 by Lord Pityme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: Another big payoff for Kpwenka, jeez the cash is fair flying oot the door. This board have f**ked up royally. casting my mind back to before the window opened, and people suggesting we might sign five or six new/loanees. Well i was wrong to think we wouldnt indeed bring that many in, but then again with SIXTEEN having gone out, and possibly a couple more to follow..? We need five or six just to get eleven on the feckin pitch! this has got to have been the most cash our board have jizzed away for many a year? But....but no money! But,....delusional if you think we'll bring in more than about 3 players! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 So which are we doing? Are we scaling back or spunking money? You've now accused us of doing both. We simply can't be doing both. 2 weeks ago you had convinced yourself and were trying to convince everyone that we were letting folk go to scale right down. Now we're full of reckless abandon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisleyporridge Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: Another big payoff for Kpwenka How do you know there was a pay off? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 minute ago, djchapsticks said: So which are we doing? Are we scaling back or spunking money? You've now accused us of doing both. We simply can't be doing both. 2 weeks ago you had convinced yourself and were trying to convince everyone that we were letting folk go to scale right down. Now we're full of reckless abandon. Dont you think sixteen out and five in is not scaling down ffs? The club are having to pay players to leave, and go on loan. And still have to pay whoever they recruit (so far five extra wages) Just now, Paisleyporridge said: How do you know there was a pay off? You think he walked out of a two year contract for nowt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Ethan said: Would still like Flynn to go When he started game on Saturday I was wondering if this was an opportunity for him to show he could still offer something. He blew it. IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 hour ago, buddies1877 said: depending what is out there I wouldn’t mind getting rid of Cooke,Flynn and kellerman. I know a lot of fans are taking to Cooke but I just haven’t been impressed by him at all think he would end up in part time football if he stayed in Scotland after we release him. If we release him, he'll head back to sunny Truro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 31 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: Another big payoff for Kpwenka, jeez the cash is fair flying oot the door. This board have f**ked up royally. casting my mind back to before the window opened, and people suggesting we might sign five or six new/loanees. Well i was wrong to think we wouldnt indeed bring that many in, but then again with SIXTEEN having gone out, and possibly a couple more to follow..? We need five or six just to get eleven on the feckin pitch! this has got to have been the most cash our board have jizzed away for many a year? To think nobody could have got it harder than Mr.Gilmour in some peoples eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 minute ago, pod said: To think nobody could have got it harder than Mr.Gilmour in some peoples eyes. His last few managerial appointments were dismal and relegated us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: His last few managerial appointments were dismal and relegated us. Had a couple of chairmen prior to him that made bigger errors of judgement. Sacking Ferguson and Clunie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: Dont you think sixteen out and five in is not scaling down ffs? The club are having to pay players to leave, and go on loan. And still have to pay whoever they recruit (so far five extra wages. You think he walked out of a two year contract for nowt? The squad needed scaling down., no doubt some of the departures will have been sweetened but the real question is whether or not we come out of the window with a squad of 21/22 (excluding youth players) capable of competing at Bottom 6 level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 minute ago, pod said: Had a couple of chairmen prior to him that made bigger errors of judgement. Sacking Ferguson and Clunie. Yip, we really seem to luck put on getting the right man in place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: Dont you think sixteen out and five in is not scaling down ffs? The club are having to pay players to leave, and go on loan. And still have to pay whoever they recruit (so far five extra wages) You think he walked out of a two year contract for nowt? First - Go on then tell us who we are having to pay-off? (Names and evidence that supports this assertion please?) Second - we have signed 6 not 5 . plus we re signed Ferdinand for the rest of the season. Not sure how this is 5 extra wages when we have stopped paying 16 (2 in part) -even if you cut out the 2 we have loaned out - simple arithmetic decrees 14 - 6 = 8 less wages currently - Sums not your strong point? (I don't know what is!) Third - once again you ASS U ME we have paid off players to leave and to go on loan. Those who have gone on loan will mean that we pay less of their wages - so that is a plus for our budget too (This has been explained to you before, but it goes Whoosh over your head or straight in one ear and out the other). It seems that we also got some cash for Smith (But you always miss the positives) ... Who did we have to pay-off and how much did it cost? You have no idea, and nor do I - but I strongly suspect the BOD managed this really well - it is their job to do so and I see no evidence that they have NOT turned the Stubzo debacle around better than most fans could have expected. What was KP's choice - stay out of football, even reserve football for 2 years just to keep picking up a wage from a club that clearly wants nothing to do with you? Take the money and watch your chance at a career fritter away for 2 years - I don't think so . . . So chances were it would be little more than a token pay-off to free him to play some football over the next 2 years... Fourth - We are NOT done in the Transfer Window - so how can we afford more players when in your accounting the BOD have frittered all our money away? Cheers for the entertainment ! Edited January 21, 2019 by Sweeper07 error 6 in not 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 Just now, Bud the Baker said: The squad needed scaling down., no doubt some of the departures will have been sweetened but the real question is whether or not we come out of the window with a squad of 21/22 (excluding youth players) capable of competing at Bottom 6 level. Indeed, as well as seeing if two or three other teams can be equally as competitive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Sweeper07 said: First - Go on then tell us who we are having to pay-off? (Names and evidence that supports this assertion please?) Second - we have signed 6 not 5 . plus we re signed Ferdinand for the rest of the season. Not sure how this is 5 extra wages when we have stopped paying 16 (2 in part) -even if you cut out the 2 we have loaned out - simple arithmetic decrees 14 - 5 = 9 less wages currently - Sums not your strong point? (I don't know what is!) Third - once again you ASS U ME we have paid off players to leave and to go on loan. Those who have gone on loan will mean that we pay less of their wages - so that is a plus for our budget too (This has been explained to you before, but it goes Whoosh over your head or straight in one ear and out the other). It seems that we also got some cash for Smith (But you always miss the positives) ... Who did we have to pay-off and how much did it cost? You have no idea, and nor do I - but I strongly suspect the BOD managed this really well - it is their job to do so and I see no evidence that they have NOT turned the Stubzo debacle around better than most fans could have expected. What was KP's choice - stay out of football, even reserve football for 2 years just to keep picking up a wage from a club that clearly wants nothing to do with you? Take the money and watch your chance at a career fritter away for 2 years - I don't think so . . . So chances were it would be little more than a token pay-off to free him to play some football over the next 2 years... Fourth - We are NOT done in the Transfer Window - so how can we afford more players when in your accounting the BOD have frittered all our money away? Cheers for the entertainment ! I see you writing letters of complaint in green ink. We always had a cast iron rule.. never do home visits to anyone who writes in in green ink! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Lord Pityme said: Yip, we really seem to luck put on getting the right man in place. Even a Chairman with bags of money can't buy success. Newcastle comes to mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: I see you writing letters of complaint in green ink. We always had a cast iron rule.. never do home visits to anyone who writes in in green ink! So that is your comeback REALLY - You are a TOTAL TWAT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 hour ago, St.Ricky said: I think that's fair bazil but this happens more often than you might be entitled to expect from a player with his talent. He needs to impose himself more. The first 10 minutes was very open and we might have taken the lead early on.. But didn't. I think it's a bit harsh for a player that only played for part of a half. Can't judge Flynn too heavily on that game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 Just now, Sweeper07 said: So that is your comeback REALLY - You are a TOTAL TWAT Hence the 'Green Ink' rule, still standing the test of time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, bazil85 said: I think it's a bit harsh for a player that only played for part of a half. Can't judge Flynn too heavily on that game. Not his first game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornwall_Saint Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 40 minutes ago, pod said: If we release him, he'll head back to sunny Truro. You obviously can’t have spent much time in Cornwall 1 hour ago, buddies1877 said: I know a lot of fans are taking to Cooke but I just haven’t been impressed by him at all think he would end up in part time football if he stayed in Scotland after we release him. I reckon Cody will stay for the season. He seems to be the one who’s kept his head and worked his backside off to fight for his place where others have taken hissy fits or given up. He may not be the best, but Kearney has stated he needs players up for the fight, Cody has clearly shown he’s a fighter, and that attitude could go a long way for us. This battle to survive isn’t just physical, it’s mental too, and I reckon Kearney values that in Cody and will at least give him until the end of the season. Finding the net against Alloa can only help his chances. He may not be the best, I guess it’s like having Wardlaw again. Occasional goal, not brilliant but gives everything he can, and from Cody’s effort to prove himself to Kearney we could be seeing something similar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.