HSS Posted February 5, 2019 Report Share Posted February 5, 2019 12 minutes ago, Isle Of Bute Saint said: ok I will try and simplify what I'm sure you already know. 1/ Felt cheated by a incompetent ref who is clearly not up to the job. 2/ Wilbur pointed out the reporter did not mention St Mirren on the game. What can the reporter write when St Mirren had not one shoot on target. My opinion which I have already wrote is that our keeper was our best player. If you don't agree fine the forums is about opinions. Sorry mate but your writing style meant I genuinely didnt know what you were complaining about. 1.Ref was incompetent. 2.The "match report" is not really a "match report",more an article on an incompetent ref. 3.I feel you are saying it's ok to give loads of pens against us as we never had a shot on target.It doesn't matter how good,bad or indifferent we were,our performance doesn't justify the refs performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibbles old paperboy Posted February 5, 2019 Report Share Posted February 5, 2019 11 hours ago, Isle Of Bute Saint said: It's why the reporter in the Times wrote nothing on Saints that is my point. It felt like being cheated as a fan. It's traditional when professional journalists write about penalty incidents that they usually describe the incident, the player giving away the foul. Not to mention Erhahon, P McGinn or Tansey (x2) would seem an oversight! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.