shull Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Sweeper07 said: Not Sweep on this signing - I mentioned 1st he was coming back in January and knew the plan was for him to be back with us this season a month ago... but hey ho! What do I know . . . (awaiting the abuse) . . . Sorry, all your abusers are in a coma, apart from me. Ye boring turd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wendy Saintss Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 Not Sweep on this signing - I mentioned 1st he was coming back in January and knew the plan was for him to be back with us this season a month ago... but hey ho! What do I know . . . (awaiting the abuse) . . . ^^^^^ still pretending to be ITK [emoji1] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaybee Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 18 hours ago, shull said: Oh forfuxsake. That is bad news. Why did they build our hopes up this morning. Feckem I am no coming back. Please. please, please, make this be true; I'll be good forever and ever and ever etc etc etc. I#ll even be nice tae that weeeeeeeeeeeee faraway guy...........fur a weeeeeeeeee while, he he he. 😋 😋 😋 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaybee Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Sweeper07 said: 16 hours ago, faraway saint said: Not Sweep obviously. Not Sweep on this signing - I mentioned 1st he was coming back in January and knew the plan was for him to be back with us this season a month ago... but hey ho! What do I know . . . (awaiting the abuse) . . . flip, gosh, dash and blast, feck this that and the other..................just filling in till the Shull brigade and the weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee man fae arbroaf arrives. 😎 Nice to see him back though, bodes well for the team COYS............................. Kyle that is, no the weeeeeeeeeee nyaf fae abroaf Edited August 10, 2019 by jaybee clarification Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 19 minutes ago, jaybee said: flip, gosh, dash and blast, feck this that and the other..................just filling in till the Shull brigade and the weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee man fae arbroaf arrives. 😎 Nice to see him back though, bodes well for the team COYS............................. Kyle that is, no the weeeeeeeeeee nyaf fae abroaf ^^^^^^^^^^ What the feck are you on..........................................about? 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wendy Saintss Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 flip, gosh, dash and blast, feck this that and the other..................just filling in till the Shull brigade and the weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee man fae arbroaf arrives. [emoji41] Nice to see him back though, bodes well for the team COYS............................. Kyle that is, no the weeeeeeeeeee nyaf fae abroaf^^^^^ replying to his own posts [emoji1] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 The official site saying we resigned McAllister for a undisclosed fee Surprise we paid some cash for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tommy said: The official site saying we resigned McAllister for a undisclosed fee Surprise we paid some cash for him. It is a token gesture that helps Derby save face . . . nothing more, other than the possibility of a percentage back to them if we sell him on (But who knows what's in the players contract) Can we complain? We got a tidy sum for him a couple of years back and they have trained him for the last 2 - now he is back and signed on a 3 year deal. Win win win win all day long (So long as he keeps fit and contributes to his capability) . . . Edited August 10, 2019 by Sweeper07 changed a d for an s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 18 minutes ago, Sweeper07 said: It is a token gesture that helps Derby save face . . . nothing more, other than the possibility of a percentage back to them if we sell him on (But who knows what's in the players contract) Can we complain? We got a tidy sum for him a couple of years back and they have trained him for the last 2 - now he is back and signed on a 3 year deal. Win win win win all day long (So long as he keeps fit and contributed to his ability) . . . How much did we pay then & what is the sell on percentage? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 44 minutes ago, Tommy said: The official site saying we resigned McAllister for a undisclosed fee Surprise we paid some cash for him. Not surprised. Think he was available to offers. We got lucky in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaybee Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 56 minutes ago, Tommy said: The official site saying we resigned McAllister for a undisclosed fee Surprise we paid some cash for him. Maybe there was a token figure, maybe it was a percentage if he is sold on, either way gets him off Derbys books and we get a player the fans love and he can play a bit too. Good business for the team and just proves what idle gits TF, GM and the backroom staff are ....................... NOT. 😃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 22 minutes ago, Kemp said: How much did we pay then & what is the sell on percentage? Not very much in terms of what he is worth - hence why I said token gesture. Do you think we would be paying a fee of £50,000 or more? And I don't know the details in the contract for sell on and said as much - "the possibility" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russian Saint Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 It is a token gesture that helps Derby save face . . . nothing more, other than the possibility of a percentage back to them if we sell him on (But who knows what's in the players contract) Can we complain? We got a tidy sum for him a couple of years back and they have trained him for the last 2 - now he is back and signed on a 3 year deal. Win win win win all day long (So long as he keeps fit and contributes to his capability) . . .That “Token gesture” will more than pay for itself if he performs to the level we know he can, and we avoid the playoffs this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wendy Saintss Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 Not very much in terms of what he is worth - hence why I said token gesture. Do you think we would be paying a fee of £50,000 or more? And I don't know the details in the contract for sell on and said as much - "the possibility"Okay, so you made up the bit about the sell on.But what was the actual fee we paid Derby? Or did you just make up that it was “token” as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wendy Saintss Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 Viagra is melting your small brain, cut down the quantity, ya halfwit. Here I’ll make it simple for you you gimp. McLoughlin, Waters and McAllister weren’t available to sign before the League Cup began ( and maybe the rest weren’t either). Do you think we should have signed lesser players just for the League Cup instead of signing these 3? 8 of the starting 11 against Hibs were available for the League Cup as were Baird and McGinn who have been regulars for the past 2 years. They should have been good enough to qualify from that group and allow the management team time to get in the players they really wanted. You clown! [emoji1] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 32 minutes ago, Wendy Saintss said: Here I’ll make it simple for you you gimp. Thanks McLoughlin, Waters and McAllister weren’t available to sign before the League Cup began ( and maybe the rest weren’t either). Maybe they were. Do you think we should have signed lesser players just for the League Cup instead of signing these 3? No, do you? 8 of the starting 11 against Hibs were available for the League Cup as were Baird and McGinn who have been regulars for the past 2 years. That's nice. They should have been good enough to qualify from that group and allow the management team time to get in the players they really wanted. Indeed, the management team failed miserably in getting players to perform to their potential. You clown! You're a clown. 🤡 ^^^^^^^^ Almost in tears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wendy Saintss Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 ^^^^^^^^ Almost in tears. Weirdo [emoji12] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibbles old paperboy Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 2 hours ago, Wendy Saintss said: Here I’ll make it simple for you you gimp. Your grammar is slipping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted January 8, 2020 Report Share Posted January 8, 2020 Calum Waters to continue his loan with us. More "meh" performances than good ones IMO. Needs to up his game, especially with Famewo being able to play at LB. https://www.stmirren.com/all-news/3414-calum-waters-to-remain-at-saints-until-end-of-the-season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddies1877 Posted January 8, 2020 Report Share Posted January 8, 2020 Surprised waters has extended his contract with a club that aren’t willing to give him his chance.Would have probably preferred we looked elsewhere for a left back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 Really surprised at the logic behind this. Why are St Mirren giving a player experience that will not be of any benefit to St Mirren but will benefit a rival team next season? Surely we should have let him go and signed someone else at left back and if they were ok then give them a contract for next season. In the meantime any new player will be gelling with the team. It is not as if Waters is wonderful. Even a loan would be a better option for us. I am hoping Akin now takes over left back and Waters is only used as a sub. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 Really surprised at the logic behind this. Why are St Mirren giving a player experience that will not be of any benefit to St Mirren but will benefit a rival team next season? Surely we should have let him go and signed someone else at left back and if they were ok then give them a contract for next season. In the meantime any new player will be gelling with the team. It is not as if Waters is wonderful. Even a loan would be a better option for us. I am hoping Akin now takes over left back and Waters is only used as a sub.We signed him on a year long loan. The only way this could have been terminated was at Kilmarnock's request for a recall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 39 minutes ago, Sonny said: Really surprised at the logic behind this. Why are St Mirren giving a player experience that will not be of any benefit to St Mirren but will benefit a rival team next season? Surely we should have let him go and signed someone else at left back and if they were ok then give them a contract for next season. In the meantime any new player will be gelling with the team. It is not as if Waters is wonderful. Even a loan would be a better option for us. I am hoping Akin now takes over left back and Waters is only used as a sub. Might be concerns over familiarity. Decent chance we’ll have two different CB for a number of games second half of the season. Would we also want to bed in a new LB as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayrshire Saints Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 Exactly there has been no "extension " or us "talking him back ". Killie were calling the shots.We signed him on a year long loan. The only way this could have been terminated was at Kilmarnock's request for a recall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 Funnily enough I am aware it is a season-long loan with Kilmarnock having a Jan recall option. However the wording of the press release stated that 'it had been agreed' suggesting that the decision was not just down to Kilmarnock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.