Jump to content

Don't buy the Sun


beyond our ken

Recommended Posts

I couldn't believe the reports that the Sun saw fit to pay a person NOT related to Ben Stokes who claimed to be a "family member" for a story about possibly the worst thing that could occur in a mother's life.

If you buy it, you are as bad as the scum who write it and i feel sorry for the working people who have to print it.  

In my opinion, every English cricket player would be justified in never appearing at an ECB press conference again and the ECB should be banning Newscorp from all future England games & events

Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 minutes ago, beyond our ken said:

I couldn't believe the reports that the Sun saw fit to pay a person NOT related to Ben Stokes who claimed to be a "family member" for a story about possibly the worst thing that could occur in a mother's life.

If you buy it, you are as bad as the scum who write it and i feel sorry for the working people who have to print it.  

In my opinion, every English cricket player would be justified in never appearing at an ECB press conference again and the ECB should be banning Newscorp from all future England games & events

Seen this yesterday on the news and to give the news credit they didn't go into any detail.

I'm surprised anyone buys the Sun, even without this latest shameful story, it's 90% garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

Seen this yesterday on the news and to give the news credit they didn't go into any detail.

I'm surprised anyone buys the Sun, even without this latest shameful story, it's 90% garbage.

Saw.. Saw this F Man. Don't buy the Sun, Don't buy the Times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other news sources aren't much better once the story has broken (it doesn't even have to be a newspaper these days) then they're all able to condemn the original source then jump into the prurient details.

Similar situation with the Gavin Thomas HIV story with him saying today a journalist parents told his parents about it before he could.

I understand the Ben Stokes story was already in the public domain for those who cared to delve but I thought one of the outcomes of the Levinson enquiry was that newspapers would have to justify that a story was "in the public interest" rather than just one that "interested the public" or did that go by the wayside while I was arguing about whether us paying a transfer fee for Doug Imrie was a good decision? :zipit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...