Tommy Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, Hiram Abiff said: 1. And so are we 2. What is your evidence that they are badly run under current ownership? 3. Don't worry, I won't. 1. We not. 2. A 436K lost tells me that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 2 hours ago, Lord Pityme said: Sell their asset when he's fit? I doubt you would bring in much offering Blow Jobs. No the loss has happened already. You don't get the luxury of waiting until this player is fit. How do you plug the loss today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Hiram Abiff said: Use some of the £1.7 million profit from the previous season? Sell David Turnbull? Sadly no. That £1.7 million went to pay off their previous debts to Boyle and Hutchison. So any other ideas? Edited December 18, 2019 by oaksoft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 2 hours ago, Lord Pityme said: What a novel idea! Instead of spaffing hundreds of thousands paying for bad decisions I suppose the board could have created a brand new revenue stream? Nah..! That's too much like actually working and building the club. Thanks for your OG lol Which, as a previous expert on this forum who had experience of running more than one coffee shop explained, would require a substantial turnover to make it work. How many cups of coffee do you think that shop will sell when it has no natural footfall and is outside the town centre? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayrshire Saints Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 Amazing insight for someone who has been a member for just a few days. I wish the Alias brigade were just a bit more cute about it ! [mention=5]FTOF[/mention] does okay out of it from what I heard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 2 hours ago, Tommy said: 1. We not. 2. A 436K lost tells me that. 1. The accounts say we are 2. It doesn’t. It was funded by a £1.7 million profit from the previous season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 1 hour ago, oaksoft said: Sadly no. That £1.7 million went to pay off their previous debts to Boyle and Hutchison. So any other ideas? Can you show me your evidence for that assertion? I gave you 2 ideas. Both are valid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Ayrshire Saints said: Amazing insight for someone who has been a member for just a few days. I wish the Alias brigade were just a bit more cute about it ! I know the guy personally, hence the assertion. There is an actual real world out there. 😃 Edited December 18, 2019 by Hiram Abiff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 2 hours ago, bazil85 said: 1. It is 2. I don’t care if you think it’s fine or not 3. Nothing to do with me 4. Didn’t contribute to that point 😜 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 1. The accounts say we are 2. It doesn’t. It was funded by a £1.7 million profit from the previous season. 1. 100K profit and having 700K in the bank at the end of the season is not us being skint [emoji23] 2. Assuming it was the money tree that paid off the previous owners then [emoji23] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 Can you show me your evidence for that assertion? I gave you 2 ideas. Both are valid. Can you prove otherwise ? [emoji23] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Ayrshire Saints said: Amazing insight for someone who has been a member for just a few days. I wish the Alias brigade were just a bit more cute about it ! What a mess you are/ The new member may have been reading the Forum since 2002. All recent new members may have been reading without contributing for many many years as Guests. You and DougJamie are very thick on this matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 DOugJamie thinks that a forumster with only say 61 posts has no right to comment on anything. Not realising we all had 61 posts at one time. Fully deserves the Village Idiot title with Ayrshire Saint closing in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayrshire Saints Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 You could but you prove that isn't usually the case. Go and ask one of your alter egos how long they lurked for. As for being a mess, I'm not the one posting under umpteen alias' just so I have someone to engage with. What a mess you are/ The new member may have been reading the Forum since 2002. All recent new members may have been reading without contributing for many many years as Guests. You and DougJamie are very thick on this matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, Ayrshire Saints said: You could but you prove that isn't usually the case. Go and ask one of your alter egos how long they lurked for. As for being a mess, I'm not the one posting under umpteen alias' just so I have someone to engage with. What does it matter what username, alias, people use? It's still a person behind it saying whatever shite they want to say? Too many people focus on the username rather than the post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 37 minutes ago, Ayrshire Saints said: You could but you prove that isn't usually the case. Go and ask one of your alter egos how long they lurked for. As for being a mess, I'm not the one posting under umpteen alias' just so I have someone to engage with. Your head is fecked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 34 minutes ago, faraway saint said: What does it matter what username, alias, people use? It's still a person behind it saying whatever shite they want to say? Too many people focus on the username rather than the post. Correct Sir. Ha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 11 hours ago, Tommy said: 1. 100K profit and having 700K in the bank at the end of the season is not us being skint 2. Assuming it was the money tree that paid off the previous owners then Why assume? Just quote from the Motherwell accounts. You have read them I presume..... because if you haven’t then every reply you’ve made to me is irrelevant 😂 A bit like yourself! 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 14 hours ago, Hiram Abiff said: 1. It is 2. I don’t care if you think it’s fine or not 3. Nothing to do with me 4. Didn’t contribute to that point 😜 All fine, just repetition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 14 hours ago, Hiram Abiff said: Can you show me your evidence for that assertion? I gave you 2 ideas. Both are valid. Yep. Try the following link. www.google.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 3 hours ago, Hiram Abiff said: Why assume? Just quote from the Motherwell accounts. You have read them I presume..... because if you haven’t then every reply you’ve made to me is irrelevant 😂 A bit like yourself! 😂 I did, it said 436K lost for year 2918-2019. Ignore me if I am so irrelevant to you. Feel free to have the last words whoever you really are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 13 hours ago, oaksoft said: Yep. Try the following link. www.google.com You asked for the proof so you try it arsehole Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 12 hours ago, Tommy said: I did, it said 436K lost for year 2918-2019. Ignore me if I am so irrelevant to you. Feel free to have the last words whoever you really are ^^^ utter irrelavance i am me, who are you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Hiram Abiff said: You asked for the proof so you try it arsehole I didn't ask you for proof of anything. You mixed me up with another poster you utter bellend. Edited December 19, 2019 by oaksoft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiram Abiff Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 13 hours ago, bazil85 said: All fine, just repetition. Not fine, just repetition Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.