Jump to content

Coronavirus


faraway saint

Recommended Posts


  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/10/2023 at 6:17 PM, faraway saint said:

Just heard the WHO have declared that covid is no longer a public health emergency of international concern.

That is except in East Kilbride. :lol:

Even hospitals and doctors surgeries are abandoning the use of masks, LONG overdue. 

Poor @BuddieinEK, his period of mourning could be at an end, or maybe not. 

11 days and nobody bit or responded. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Losing your touch bully boy. Playground diminishing?

FWIW, I genuinely grieve over people I loved and supported that were lost through the thing we mention not. 

You mock that.

Your right. Fair enough.

Your playground. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuddieinEK said:

And still you mock bully boy. Mummy must be prooud. Narcissist

Irony.

You spewed your grief all over this thread when most people were hit by the tragic effects of covid.

Everybody kept it to themself, except you.

A professional mourner. 

Oh woe is me..........aye, unbelievable but so you.

Run along, it's not ALL about you. 🤡

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

Irony.

You spewed your grief all over this thread when most people were hit by the tragic effects of covid.

Everybody kept it to themself, except you.

A professional mourner. 

Oh woe is me..........aye, unbelievable but so you.

Run along, it's not ALL about you. 🤡

 

I will leave this discussion hanging here for others to judge. Master baiter and playground bully. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally caught it ..... yeah its a bummer however i wasnt treated like i had the plague.... was at party with a bunch of Texans and about 20 out of 50 caught it.. so its still there.... but its not very 2023 so who gives a feck... was thinking about finding 25 albanians and getting a wee boat to Cumbrae to be in the now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, DougJamie said:

Finally caught it ..... yeah its a bummer however i wasnt treated like i had the plague.... was at party with a bunch of Texans and about 20 out of 50 caught it.. so its still there.... but its not very 2023 so who gives a feck... was thinking about finding 25 albanians and getting a wee boat to Cumbrae to be in the now

 

IMG_1835.thumb.jpeg.2d3417f87fcc3dc237f710a60d569c8a.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Depending on where you live, you can still walk in to a vaccination centre and if you are overdue either COVID, pneumococal or flu boosters then they will most likely admininster them.  My wife is co-ordinating clinics in the Forth Valley and has walk-in patients every day, mosty advised by their GP practice to get along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, DougJamie said:

Did you read the report or the scurrilous selctive quotes from it in the Express?

The report concluded this on the physical measures (which included lockdown, in all it's forms)

"3.1.2 Physical measures advised or mandated in August to December 2020 In the summer of 2020 the number of new COVID-19 cases across the UK declined. This was attributed, in part, to the effectiveness of the physical measures that had been mandated earlier that year."

So, it was undeniably true that there was no evidence at the time decisions were taken to suggest that they WOULD be effective.  That is because there were no studies done in respect of COVID or these forms of lockdown in our society and noone has undertaken any studies into that scenario since then, not because there was ANY evidence to the contrary.  To suggest on the basis of this report, that the physical measures were not effective or needed  is just daft-the report states that they were an undoubted part of limiting the spread.

Edited by beyond our ken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, beyond our ken said:

Did you read the report or the scurrilous selctive quotes from it in the Express?

The report concluded this on the physical measures (which included lockdown, in all it's forms)

"3.1.2 Physical measures advised or mandated in August to December 2020 In the summer of 2020 the number of new COVID-19 cases across the UK declined. This was attributed, in part, to the effectiveness of the physical measures that had been mandated earlier that year."

So, it was undeniably true that there was no evidence at the time decisions were taken to suggest that they WOULD be effective.  That is because there were no studies done in respect of COVID or these forms of lockdown in our society and noone has undertaken any studies into that scenario since then, not because there was ANY evidence to the contrary.  To suggest on the basis of this report, that the physical measures were not effective or needed  is just daft-the report states that they were an undoubted part of limiting the spread.

In your humble opinion...well at least the gov made their pals happy .... Sweden encouraged the spread and are in a far better position than us and the ridiculous NZ  approach.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DougJamie said:

In your humble opinion...well at least the gov made their pals happy .... Sweden encouraged the spread and are in a far better position than us and the ridiculous NZ  approach.... 

In my opinion?  i quoted directly from the report and not from an Express report which was obviously pursuing a particular angle.  I also never took any sides of the argument and only showed how the express twisted a tiny bit of the report to suit it's own agenda.

If you are happier with the opinion of a newspaper that took a wee slice out of a report dozens of pages long then that's fine.  

Regarding the UK's current position, our problems are down to a lot more than just coronavirus

Edited by beyond our ken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2023 at 10:01 AM, beyond our ken said:

Did you read the report or the scurrilous selctive quotes from it in the Express?

The report concluded this on the physical measures (which included lockdown, in all it's forms)

"3.1.2 Physical measures advised or mandated in August to December 2020 In the summer of 2020 the number of new COVID-19 cases across the UK declined. This was attributed, in part, to the effectiveness of the physical measures that had been mandated earlier that year."

So, it was undeniably true that there was no evidence at the time decisions were taken to suggest that they WOULD be effective.  That is because there were no studies done in respect of COVID or these forms of lockdown in our society and noone has undertaken any studies into that scenario since then, not because there was ANY evidence to the contrary.  To suggest on the basis of this report, that the physical measures were not effective or needed  is just daft-the report states that they were an undoubted part of limiting the spread.

Sweden didn’t lockdown and have had the least number of excess deaths in Europe

Lockdowns have killed thousands in the U.K and millions worldwide, caused the cost of living crisis, destroyed the education of children, destroyed business, ruined lives, crippled the NHS, plunged millions into poverty worldwide, the rich have got richer and poor have got poorer. 
 

And all of this was for seen, I stated it would happen from the very beginning


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sue Denim said:

Sweden didn’t lockdown and have had the least number of excess deaths in Europe

Lockdowns have killed thousands in the U.K and millions worldwide, caused the cost of living crisis, destroyed the education of children, destroyed business, ruined lives, crippled the NHS, plunged millions into poverty worldwide, the rich have got richer and poor have got poorer. 
 

And all of this was for seen, I stated it would happen from the very beginning


 

 

4 points

The Swedish Government had active pandemic planning activities in the years leading up to the COVID 19 pandemic and while not having a knowledge-base that supported their tactic they did have enough quasi-independent advice to allow them to be comfortable with their stance which led to them prioritising the economy.  They knew that any approach would be a gamble .  The fact that they had fewer excess deaths, or at least seemd to, was a very welcome bonus.

The Swedish government did bring in a raft of protections such as shutting down non-essential services, restrictions on the use of public transport, social distancing which was more rigourously observed by the population than here and bans on large gatherings and events.  Swedes were expected to follow very much the same restrictions as ourselves without the legal weight, which was always there and ready to be used if needed, however the Swedes seemed to be far more publc spirited than many other countries

They referred older COVID patients to be moved to palliative and respite care, effectively not giving them restorative medicine and it remains to be seen how many of the people designated as age-related deaths actually died of COVID.  They were effectively sacrifised as no-longer being economically active.

Finally, Sweden has a massive boost to reducing the spread of infectious disease, it has a population density of only 26, Scotland's is more than 2.5 times that and the larger countries in Europe have densities that approach 10 times that of Sweden.  The number of deaths in the few large cities was massively more than the less populated areas, had Stockholm or Gothenburg's figures been typical then the lack of lockdown would have been blamed for a massive wave of death.

My view is that the article that sparked this line of debate was selective and the reality is that it actually argues against it's own point.  There were no studies, no pandemic planning and no modelling  that were done by the responsible body, which is the UK government.  To say that the Scottish Government made it's decisions without evidence is absolutely correct since the people who retained responsibility for this never acted and that is the true reason why the UK's response was so slow and poor

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, beyond our ken said:

  To say that the Scottish Government made it's decisions without evidence is absolutely correct since the people who retained responsibility for this never acted and that is the true reason why the UK's response was so slow and poor

 

Are you saying the Scottish Government had no power to make decision on its response to covid? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...