portmahomack saint Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 45 minutes ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said: You are completely missing the point Munoz. Until the last 20 minutes Aberdeen hadn’t even looked like scoring. Once they equalised and we got tired you could see the winner coming all the way. It was a shocking dereliction of duty y Goodwin. And as for you saying you’d probably have made he same mistake. You are not paid to be a professional football manager. Totally agree, a blind man could see Morias legs had gone, the only positive thing I can see in him is his ability to put in a shift and that had gone, but Jim wasn't the only one who couldn't see that in the last minute Sheron plays a 50yd pass over his head for him to chase down unbelievable, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAFKA Jersey 2 Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 31 minutes ago, FTOF said: Given the way that both Durmus and McAllister have defended so far this season, a player who was tired, but defending well, would still be seen as a better option by many. McAllister in particular has a habit of making clumsy tackles at the edge of the box and conceding free kicks. He rarely tracks back either. If either of those players had come on and failed to tackle/pick up his man, resulting in a goal, Goodwin would be getting pelters for putting on a player who can't defend well. They haven't even been effective as an "out ball", as they constantly give possession away. He couldn't win (literally) really. Very fine margins indeed. FFS FTOF it’s not about McAllister or Durmus’s ability to defend. It’s about fresh legs and the ability to relieve pressure. How is Morias defending well when Hayes and co are going past him like he’s running in treacle? I’m not saying he hadn’t put a shift in, but he was done with 15 to go. Find me another game in the country where a manager didn’t make a single substitution. You are defending the indefensible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 (edited) 57 minutes ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said: FFS FTOF it’s not about McAllister or Durmus’s ability to defend. It’s about fresh legs and the ability to relieve pressure. How is Morias defending well when Hayes and co are going past him like he’s running in treacle? I’m not saying he hadn’t put a shift in, but he was done with 15 to go. Find me another game in the country where a manager didn’t make a single substitution. You are defending the indefensible. Which, as I have pointed out, neither McAllister or Durmus seem capable of doing this season as they have been pish. I'd wager that if either had come on they would have spent the time running about, on their "fresh legs", barely touching the ball and failing to make a tackle. Also, going from what I've seen this season, Hayes would have been running past McAllister and Durmus, even with their "fresh legs". I'm not defending the indefensible IMO. We'll agree to disagree. Edited October 4, 2020 by FTOF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddieinEK Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 I reckon that any other time, Jim WOULD have made the substitutions and we would have got a point...But only 4 on the bench and no subs used was a message to the board re the sale of Magennis and need for further recruits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAFKA Jersey 2 Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 17 minutes ago, BuddieinEK said: I reckon that any other time, Jim WOULD have made the substitutions and we would have got a point... But only 4 on the bench and no subs used was a message to the board re the sale of Magennis and need for further recruits. And if we get relegated by 1 point, I hope he’s proud of his little petulant statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAFKA Jersey 2 Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 58 minutes ago, FTOF said: Which, as I have pointed out, neither McAllister or Durmus seem capable of doing this season as they have been pish. I'd wager that if either had come on they would have spent the time running about, on their "fresh legs", barely touching the ball and failing to make a tackle. Also, going from what I've seen this season, Hayes would have been running past McAllister and Durmus, even with their "fresh legs". I'm not defending the indefensible IMO. We'll agree to disagree. So let me get this straight. You’re saying that had he subbed Morias (who a blind man could see was running on empty) and we’d still lost due to the lack of ability of McAllister or Durmus to stem the tide, folk would’ve been up in arms at him subbing Morias?? Aye, let’s agree to disagree on that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 Who could and should have been on the bench with the 4 that was ? I can't think of anyone who wasn't injured or suspended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 16 minutes ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said: And if we get relegated by 1 point, I hope he’s proud of his little petulant statement. Aye, I would suggest that he did that as some sort of statement is stretching things to unimaginable lengths. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAFKA Jersey 2 Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 16 minutes ago, faraway saint said: Aye, I would suggest that he did that as some sort of statement is stretching things to unimaginable lengths. I’m inclined to agree. It was nothing more than incompetence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 4, 2020 Report Share Posted October 4, 2020 1 hour ago, faraway saint said: Aye, I would suggest that he did that as some sort of statement is stretching things to unimaginable lengths. I think thiz is exactly what Goodwin is all about. Not surprised one bit... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st jock Posted March 10, 2021 Report Share Posted March 10, 2021 https://www.gmfc.net/club-statement-4/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linwood buddie Posted March 10, 2021 Report Share Posted March 10, 2021 39 minutes ago, st jock said: https://www.gmfc.net/club-statement-4/ That’s them fecked then , they were actually on no a bad run 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted March 10, 2021 Report Share Posted March 10, 2021 Very good appointment for them, just what they need right now IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted March 10, 2021 Report Share Posted March 10, 2021 Best of luck, Gus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddieinEK Posted March 11, 2021 Report Share Posted March 11, 2021 That’s them fecked then , they were actually on no a bad run [emoji38]They won last night for the first time in ten games! Good luck Gus and Andy. I wish them well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santaponsasaint Posted March 11, 2021 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2021 That’s them fecked then , they were actually on no a bad run [emoji38]Better start going to the pictures [emoji38] [emoji849][emoji90] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santaponsasaint Posted March 11, 2021 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2021 So let me get this straight. You’re saying that had he subbed Morias (who a blind man could see was running on empty) and we’d still lost due to the lack of ability of McAllister or Durmus to stem the tide, folk would’ve been up in arms at him subbing Morias?? Aye, let’s agree to disagree on that! Are we talking about the same Morias who can't get a game for Borham Wood. [emoji849] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAFKA Jersey 2 Posted March 11, 2021 Report Share Posted March 11, 2021 1 hour ago, santaponsasaint said: Are we talking about the same Morias who can't get a game for Borham Wood. Yes. Not sure what your point is? The post you have quoted was complaining about JG not subbing Morias. Also, are you not a wee bit late quoting a post from 5 months ago! 😳 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linwood buddie Posted March 11, 2021 Report Share Posted March 11, 2021 17 hours ago, BuddieinEK said: They won last night for the first time in ten games! Good luck Gus and Andy. I wish them well. My bad not even checking , thought they had been doing not bad with what was going on down there , no food , manager, players and feck knows what else , but Gus is now at the wheel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddieinEK Posted March 11, 2021 Report Share Posted March 11, 2021 My bad not even checking , thought they had been doing not bad with what was going on down there , no food , manager, players and feck knows what else , but Gus is now at the wheel.No doubt about it, things are very wrong behind the scenes there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windae cleaner Posted March 12, 2021 Report Share Posted March 12, 2021 11 hours ago, BuddieinEK said: 15 hours ago, linwood buddie said: My bad not even checking , thought they had been doing not bad with what was going on down there , no food , manager, players and feck knows what else , but Gus is now at the wheel. No doubt about it, things are very wrong behind the scenes there. Are the Sleazedales still involved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddieinEK Posted March 12, 2021 Report Share Posted March 12, 2021 Are the Sleazedales still involved?Not to my knowledge.Rae's sweetie company are the main backers afaik.Were the Easdales not more interested in Ibroke? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windae cleaner Posted March 12, 2021 Report Share Posted March 12, 2021 1 minute ago, BuddieinEK said: Not to my knowledge. Rae's sweetie company are the main backers afaik. Were the Easdales not more interested in Ibroke? They are there on the board. They lost a fortune at Ibrox as they were the only ones actually putting money in. They are behind the move to move away from Cappielow to the auld IBM site Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddieinEK Posted March 12, 2021 Report Share Posted March 12, 2021 They are there on the board. They lost a fortune at Ibrox as they were the only ones actually putting money in. They are behind the move to move away from Cappielow to the auld IBM siteInteresting... They are not and haven't been registered as Directors at Companies House... Either in the football club or the property division! Are they banned from holding such an office? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted March 12, 2021 Report Share Posted March 12, 2021 18 minutes ago, windae cleaner said: They are there on the board. They lost a fortune at Ibrox as they were the only ones actually putting money in. They are behind the move to move away from Cappielow to the auld IBM site Good 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.