St Mirren v Motherwell 9/1/21

[Bud the Baker 8,976]

Am currently watching David Bowie @ Glastonbury 2000. I'd never noticed before but there's a "Grey" type alien in a Saints top (although it was actually green coloured) 👽 visible during the intro to Wild is the Wind - oh and by the way it was a penalty.

[Buddymarvellous 555]

8 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said:

Am currently watching David Bowie @ Glastonbury 2000. I'd never noticed before but there's a "Grey" type alien in a Saints top (although it was actually green coloured) 👽 visible during the intro to Wild is the Wind - oh and by the way it was a penalty.

Nearly gor an “off topic” slap there. Just saved yourself...

[billyg 5,866]

1 hour ago, FTOF said:

Good one!

Mugabe clearly kicks Erwin's foot and takes his leg away. It would be given as a foul all day long if it was outside the box.

It was a pen , there were two fouls on Erwin . He does well to  hold onto the ball , and invite the contact !

[Sonny 9,297]

The penalty wasn't any softer than the one given against Shaughnessy  v the Fakes.

[FTOF 11,542]

1 hour ago, faraway saint said:

No he doesn't. 

So what's the sound then?

A sonic boom?🤓

[Desperately Seeking Susans 1,490]

In recent times there has been a debate as to whether a player should go down if there's been some form of illegal contact.  As we've seen in other games, the football pundits have said, 'had he gone down he would have won a penalty'. 

I think that our penalty was a wrong decision but, in the current culture of penalty box activity where players artistically manipulate the rules ie. 'dives', Erwin succeeded and he could be complimented. 

Had that draw yesterday saved us from relegation, Erwin would have been praised as a hero.

[saint in exile 2,298]

1 hour ago, FTOF said:

Mugabe clearly kicks Erwin's foot and takes his leg away. It would be given as a foul all day long if it was outside the box.

Never a penalty in a million years. A slight touch on Erwin's shoulder, and Mugabi doesn't connect. But we'll take it.

[turrabuddie 1,774]

The penalty wasn't any softer than the one given against Shaughnessy  v the Fakes.

Exactly. Soft, but technically correct.

Wouldn’t have been a penalty a few seasons ago, but unfortunately, is now.

Will definitely take it though !

[BuddieinEK 9,186]

How negative  

[FTOF 11,542]

1 hour ago, saint in exile said:

Never a penalty in a million years. A slight touch on Erwin's shoulder, and Mugabi doesn't connect. But we'll take it.

Fortunately for us course he does. 

Clear as a bell on the clip, when Mugabi swipes. No contact on the ball. Only Erwin's heel.

Unless of course the club "deep faked" the clip.

Edited January 10 by FTOF

[antrin 5,097]

8 minutes ago, FTOF said:

Fortunately for us course he does. 

Clear as a bell on the clip, when Mugabi swipes. No contact on the ball. Only Erwin's heel.

Unless of course the club "deep faked" the clip.

I completely agree.

 

Erwin was being pulled away from the ball to which his foot was outstretching, when THAT foot was whipped away from him.

Penalty all day long.... 

[pod 7,592]

What does it matter, we got a point out it and they dropped two. 

[faraway saint 31,793]

5 minutes ago, pod said:

What does it matter, we got a point out it and they dropped two. 

So did they and so did we? 

[saint in exile 2,298]

1 hour ago, FTOF said:

Clear as a bell on the clip, when Mugabi swipes. No contact on the ball. Only Erwin's heel.

Sorry, but I've looked at and listened to it several times over, and it's certainly not "clear as a bell". As I said, I'll take it, but can you imagine the reaction if it was given against us?

[saint in exile 2,298]

2 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

So did they and so did we? 

I think he means from the point st which the penalty was given.

[faraway saint 31,793]

5 hours ago, faraway saint said:

If THAT had been given against us the forum would have been shouting about the ref being, well, the usual mince.

Hey, we, as I said yesterday, are carrying some luck right now, better than bad luck. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, saint in exile said:

Sorry, but I've looked at and listened to it several times over, and it's certainly not "clear as a bell". As I said, I'll take it, but can you imagine the reaction if it was given against us?

Aye, I can. 

[pod 7,592]

1 minute ago, faraway saint said:

So did they and so did we? 

Only comes into question after the penalty.  Was it or was it not a penalty, was it not that was being debated. Before then we had nil points. 

[pod 7,592]

8 minutes ago, saint in exile said:

I think he means from the point st which the penalty was given.

He's taking the mick.    Me thinks.   O my sore head.

[Slarti 937]

Aye, I can. 

Football fans tend to be completely two faced when it come to similar incidents/decisions for and against their team. It is what it is.

[saint in exile 2,298]

Just now, pod said:

He's taking the mick.    Me thinks.   O my sore head.

Can we ever be sure?

[pod 7,592]

9 minutes ago, saint in exile said:

Can we ever be sure?

He knows  how to wind people up. 

Edited January 10 by pod

[faraway saint 31,793]

4 minutes ago, saint in exile said:

Can we ever be sure?

Even I'm unsure sometimes. 

[FTOF 11,542]

1 hour ago, saint in exile said:

Sorry, but I've looked at and listened to it several times over, and it's certainly not "clear as a bell". As I said, I'll take it, but can you imagine the reaction if it was given against us?

Fortunately some of us appear to have better hearing than yourself.

Anyway, doesn't really matter as the ref correctly awarded it.

Edited January 10 by FTOF

[faraway saint 31,793]

2 minutes ago, FTOF said:

Fortunately some of us appear to have better hearing than yourself.

Anyway, doesn't really matter as the ref correctly awarded it.

The refs a fud, like you. 

[bazil85 3,352]

5 hours ago, BuddieinEK said:

I know right? You should cheer up and be a little more positive.