Jump to content

faraway saint

Prince Philip has gone

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, faraway saint said:

More deflection, and you, as usual, CHOOSE, to overlook the goings on of "rock stars".

Less procurement, are you having a laugh? :lol:

Ignore the point while you spill your bile?

Tragic. 

There's only one person spilling their bile in this conversation and it ain't me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, faraway saint said:

More unnecessary terms.

I bet most of the bands/groups you have idolised have been guilty on the technicality of being "paedophiles" when females under the legal age have looked older and offered themselves on a plate? 

In fact a bet a few people on this site have fell foul of this "technicality". 

If it keeps you happy, fire in. :thumbsdown

 

"Offered themselves on a plate".

You would make a good defence lawyer.

Child abuse is about power and about adults exploiting that power to abuse children, and if someone is underage, they are a child.

Your comments indicate you think it is almost the perpetrators who are the victims here, entrapped by these vixens determined to bag themselves a celebrity.

You've let your mask slip here. Away back to the 70's with your vile views.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Hendo said:

"Offered themselves on a plate".

You would make a good defence lawyer.

Child abuse is about power and about adults exploiting that power to abuse children, and if someone is underage, they are a child.

Your comments indicate you think it is almost the perpetrators who are the victims here, entrapped by these vixens determined to bag themselves a celebrity.

You've let your mask slip here. Away back to the 70's with your vile views.

Is that eejit actually engaging in victim-blaming children who have been abused by rock stars? :blink:

f**k sake!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hendo said:

"Offered themselves on a plate".

You would make a good defence lawyer.

Child abuse is about power and about adults exploiting that power to abuse children, and if someone is underage, they are a child.

Your comments indicate you think it is almost the who are the victims here, entrapped by these vixens determined to bag themselves a celebrity.

You've let your mask slip here. Away back to the 70's with your vile views.

And right on time arrives the lowlife. 

Doesn't reality sit well with you? 

Don't twist my words to suit your obsession with child abuse, you come across as a very unhealthy individual. 

 

Edited by faraway saint

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, oaksoft said:

Is that eejit actually engaging in victim-blaming children who have been abused by rock stars? :blink:

f**k sake!

You're usual game of putting your sad perception on something to try to take the moral high ground. 

Run along, I'm bored of your futile attempts to be smart and play to the crowd. 🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/9/2021 at 8:48 PM, faraway saint said:

 

That was in a time when, like various things that are now obscene, it was fairly common for people with money.

Nah, there's no excuse and that is one of the poorer efforts.  It was always obscene and hiring 200 locals to help further endanger a species is never acceptable.  If we swallow that line then how do you explain the very many people who were trying to end these practices even back then?  it was about exercising privilege and nothing else.  He may have regretted it later when better educated about the subject, but the "sorry mate, i never knew it was wrong" line only washes for children

It still goes on, the fairly recent pictures of various rich people have, quite rightly, raised this sort of needless slaughter to the forefront of peoples thoughts again. 

No one, certainly not me, can condone what happened then but, as the legend that is Attenborough confirmed, he has done considerable good for a very long time. 

As for duck and pheasants, I'm not overly sad for that as it's well known that they estates also provide suitable conditions for these "birds" to live and thrive, and they certainly aren't in the same boas as animals that are close to extinction. 

The award scheme, like so many successful schemes, requires a figurehead that can, and he did, give considerable time and effort.

A mate of mines messaged me tonight saying getting his award personally from him was one of the highlights of his life. 

Thanks for giving a reasonably balanced post, you're not a bad lad. :wink:

 

Sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things, every one of us should be answerable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, faraway saint said:

More unnecessary terms.

I bet most of the bands/groups you have idolised have been guilty on the technicality of being "paedophiles" when females under the legal age have looked older and offered themselves on a plate? 

In fact a bet a few people on this site have fell foul of this "technicality". 

If it keeps you happy, fire in. :thumbsdown

 

I've never idolised a rock star or any other kind of performer.  Bowie, Elvis and others all have a case to answer, even some of the supposedly "wholesome" family acts indulged.  

But think about that language-"offered themselves on a plate"?  You don't have to be around the music or entertainment scene long to learn that things are often not what they seem.  if the performers are supposedly too stupid to tell then there are plenty around them taking a salary who could keep things in line.

 

How the hell did the conversation get to this level?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oaksoft said:

Can't believe they are even considering moving football games up here because of this circus.

Even with "independence/indyref1", the SNP promised to retain the Royal Family - so why the surprise?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, faraway saint said:

And right on time arrives the lowlife. 

Doesn't reality sit well with you? 

Don't twist my words to suit your obsession with child abuse, you come across as a very unhealthy individual. 

 

No twisting required. Everyone knows what you said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/11/2021 at 4:45 PM, faraway saint said:

More unnecessary terms.

I bet most of the bands/groups you have idolised have been guilty on the technicality of being "paedophiles" when females under the legal age have looked older and offered themselves on a plate? 

In fact a bet a few people on this site have fell foul of this "technicality". 

If it keeps you happy, fire in. :thumbsdown

 

Speak for yourself I'm still a virgin 

Sexy Hot Girl GIF by Cappa Video Productions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/10/2021 at 11:13 AM, Tommy said:

The Royal Family is not something that i agree with or don't agree with.

Just something that been there all my living days and i have no feeling about them either way.

What i can't get my head around is the BBC having all their channels showing basically the same stuff, why ?

Since nearly everybody had a TV, and will get BBC1, why not that 1 channel show what they want and let the other channels get on with showing their normal shit.

If this is what is happening with Philip, god knows what it will be like when the Queen goes to join him  🤔

 

 

For me it's a form of Propaganda and mind control, it doesn't just happen in China or Russia it's everywhere.

pink floyd GIF

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A figure of 100,000 would make the coverage of Prince Philip's death the most complained-about piece of programming in BBC history.

Other programmes that attracted a high volume of correspondence included the broadcast of Jerry Springer: The Opera, which received 63,000 complaints in 2005; and Russell Brand's prank call to actor Andrew Sachs, which drew 42,000 complaints in 2008.

540B862E-2E43-4D31-BF6F-C2D7FCE85C7D.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...