Jump to content

Cammy MacPherson. Are we aff wur heed?


stlucifer
 Share

Recommended Posts


  • 4 weeks later...
22 minutes ago, magnus said:

Signed a pre contract with them. Seems we are looking for some cash. All a bit odd.

JG has just confirmed he's signed a PCA with the Fakes , and we've recalled him , crazy situation !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billyg said:

JG has just confirmed he's signed a PCA with the Fakes , and we've recalled him , crazy situation !

Not really. As JG says, why help them out in their time of strife without any financial outlay?

Jim Goodwin sets out St Mirren stance on Cammy MacPherson as he tells St Johnstone to cough up if they want midfielder back - Daily Record

I'm not sure whether the "buying" club or the player have to inform us that MacPherson has signed a PCA or not. If it's the latter, then the fakes have fucked it up big time.:lol:

They're always going on about how loaded they are. I'd say £100K will be enough to secure one of our prize assets.:rolleyes::lol

 

Edited by FTOF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, FTOF said:

Not really. As JG says, why help them out in their time of strife without any financial outlay?

Jim Goodwin sets out St Mirren stance on Cammy MacPherson as he tells St Johnstone to cough up if they want midfielder back - Daily Record

I'm not sure whether the "buying" club or the player have to inform us that MacPherson has signed a PCA or not. If it's the latter, then the fakes have fucked it up big time.:lol:

They're always going on about how loaded they are. I'd say £100K will be enough to secure one of our prize assets.:rolleyes::lol

 

When I said crazy , I meant very unusual , I can't remember another example where this happened ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see JG's point really. Mc Pherson doesn't feature in his plans, he's out on loan and signed a PCA with club. He has been recalled but will be so far down pecking order he won't play unless the fakes want him now then they need to pay a bit otherwise they will get a non match fit player. Good move by JG imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, DumboBud said:

The danger is that we now have an unhappy player in the camp that won’t be there next season. Unless this is resolved in the few days I can’t see it being a good thing. 

He can train with youth players then and be nowhere near the seniors players 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DumboBud said:

The danger is that we now have an unhappy player in the camp that won’t be there next season. Unless this is resolved in the few days I can’t see it being a good thing. 

If he has signed a PCA and we offer him a contract  , will it be the case that a fee could be set by a tribunal , so that would mean it makes sense both clubs agree a fee this window . Clever I think . Would still prefer Cammy stays with us 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All very confusing. Surely Saintees were going to be paying his wages for the remainder of the season. 
 

By calling him back we risk being lumbered with that outlay unless they think it’s worth the cash to spring him early.  
 

Would we be due a development fee from the PCA? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



All very confusing. Surely Saintees were going to be paying his wages for the remainder of the season. 
 
By calling him back we risk being lumbered with that outlay unless they think it’s worth the cash to spring him early.  
 
Would we be due a development fee from the PCA? 


Were they paying all his wages?

It all depends on what he was earning and what he will be earning. If they are willing to pay more than he was currently on, then we only need to offer what he was currently on to receive a fee if he has already signed a PCA. I think.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smart move. I imagine Cammy isn't one of our bigger earners so bringing him back for the rest of the season forces St. Johnstone's hand one way or the other and does so at relatively little cost to ourselves. 

Like it or not they are rivals in terms of where 5hey are in the league in comparison to us so if they want to strengthen with one of our assets, then they should be paying the premium to do so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also worth noting that we'll more than likely offer Cammy a new deal on the wages he's currently on, so even if we can't draw a fee for him now, St. Johnstone will still need to pay a development fee for him as he was still under 23 at the start of this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, FTOF said:

Not really. As JG says, why help them out in their time of strife without any financial outlay?

Jim Goodwin sets out St Mirren stance on Cammy MacPherson as he tells St Johnstone to cough up if they want midfielder back - Daily Record

I'm not sure whether the "buying" club or the player have to inform us that MacPherson has signed a PCA or not. If it's the latter, then the fakes have fucked it up big time.:lol:

They're always going on about how loaded they are. I'd say £100K will be enough to secure one of our prize assets.:rolleyes::lol

 

Makes sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...