Jump to content

More redundancies. Where are you SMISA?


glen

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, bazil85 said:

My reading. 

Covid & other one off costs have hurt the clubs finances. Steps taken to prevent reoccurrence & move us to break even from this year. Lots of positivity on & off the pitch since May 2022, especially in increasing attendance. 
 

Tough Financial time for our club (like many others) but it seems completely clear, claims of financial collapse & risk to the clubs future were completely fabricated…. who’d a guessed it 🤷‍♂️
 

No real surprises in the accounts summary. 

I would add that, while it's far from the drama some try to paint, if we don't take steps to reduce losses we COULD find ourselves in a very deep hole.

I happen to believe this is a time for stability and no knee jerk reactions, we have people in the right positions, especially with Tony out of the picture, to do the right thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


13 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

I would add that, while it's far from the drama some try to paint, if we don't take steps to reduce losses we COULD find ourselves in a very deep hole.

I happen to believe this is a time for stability and no knee jerk reactions, we have people in the right positions, especially with Tony out of the picture, to do the right thing. 

2023 is an awful strange year… I agree with everything FS has said here 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, bazil85 said:

My reading. 

Covid & other one off costs have hurt the clubs finances. Steps taken to prevent reoccurrence & move us to break even from this year. Lots of positivity on & off the pitch since May 2022, especially in increasing attendance. 
 

Tough Financial time for our club (like many others) but it seems completely clear, claims of financial collapse & risk to the clubs future were completely fabricated…. who’d a guessed it 🤷‍♂️
 

No real surprises in the accounts summary. 

Average home league attendance this season is 5973.

That will only keep going up if we maintain or better still improve our current form. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bazil85 said:

My reading. 

Covid & other one off costs have hurt the clubs finances. Steps taken to prevent reoccurrence & move us to break even from this year. 

Your reading is wrong.

The report clearly states that all that has been agreed is that there will be a “strategy” to move to a break even basis….… 

And that strategy will begin *next* financial year.

You’ll attempt to spin otherwise but I recognise that will be down to your ignorance and stupidity.

Edited by Sue Denim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had a quick read of the actual accounts (unlike Baz who just read a screenshot of a summary on this forum)

We’ve got net current assets of £929,510 and liabilities after more than 1 year of £1,083,494 (mainly the government loans)

Edited by Sue Denim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wage bill has increased from £3,165,331 to £3,899,396

That’s an increase of £734,065

That’s got nothing to do with Covid or one off refurbishments of the training ground.

The accounts state the break even strategy doesn’t start until next financial year so that 900k in the bank will be greatly reduced by next year

Edited by Sue Denim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppliers contracts will be reviewed it states in the report. That to me means we had not been very prudent in choosing suppliers and there are probably other suppliers who can give us a fairer price for their services. Doesn’t read well for those responsible for the awarding of contracts at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppliers contracts will be reviewed it states in the report. That to me means we had not been very prudent in choosing suppliers and there are probably other suppliers who can give us a fairer price for their services. Doesn’t read well for those responsible for the awarding of contracts at the time.
Most businesses review their suppliers contracts on a regular basis so it means nothing of the sort. I would worry if they didn't do it. Don't you shop around for the best priced gas/electric/broadband/etc suppliers? And just because another supplier offers a better deal now, it doesn't mean that they did when the last contract was taken out. Methinks you have your big spoon out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Wage bill has increased from £3,165,331 to £3,899,396
That’s an increase of £734,065
That’s got nothing to do with Covid or one off refurbishments of the training ground.
The accounts state the break even strategy doesn’t start until next financial year so that 900k in the bank will be greatly reduced by next year


How do you know that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your reading is wrong.
The report clearly states that all that has been agreed is that there will be a “strategy” to move to a break even basis….… 
And that strategy will begin *next* financial year.
You’ll attempt to spin otherwise but I recognise that will be down to your ignorance and stupidity.
Would that be next financial year from now or next financial year from the year the report is reporting on?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had a quick read of the actual accounts (unlike Baz who just read a screenshot of a summary on this forum)
We’ve got net current assets of £929,510 and liabilities after more than 1 year of £1,083,494 (mainly the government loans)
The government loans are nothing to worry about given the 0% interest and length of repayment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sue Denim said:

Your reading is wrong.

The report clearly states that all that has been agreed is that there will be a “strategy” to move to a break even basis….… 

And that strategy will begin *next* financial year.

You’ll attempt to spin otherwise but I recognise that will be down to your ignorance and stupidity.

Steps taken to prevent reoccurrence & move us to break even’
 

You mean like I said? Good effort but you’ve again made an utter fool of yourself. 
 

Steps taken - Like putting a strategy in place for example 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just had a quick read of the actual accounts (unlike Baz who just read a screenshot of a summary on this forum)
We’ve got net current assets of £929,510 and liabilities after more than 1 year of £1,083,494 (mainly the government loans)




Wage bill has increased from £3,165,331 to £3,899,396
That’s an increase of £734,065
That’s got nothing to do with Covid or one off refurbishments of the training ground.
The accounts state the break even strategy doesn’t start until next financial year so that 900k in the bank will be greatly reduced by next year


I haven't read it yet, I'll get round to it later, but is it about £900k in net assets or £900k in the bank? They're different things.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sue Denim said:

Your reading is wrong.

The report clearly states that all that has been agreed is that there will be a “strategy” to move to a break even basis….… 

And that strategy will begin *next* financial year.

You’ll attempt to spin otherwise but I recognise that will be down to your ignorance and stupidity.

Next financial year meaning the financial year following the report. 2022/23. The financial year we are currently in.

The aim is to be break even again by the end of financial year 2023/24 so I expect another modest loss next year unless we sell players this month which is pretty realistic at this point.

Edited by djchapsticks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, buddiecat said:

Suppliers contracts will be reviewed it states in the report. That to me means we had not been very prudent in choosing suppliers and there are probably other suppliers who can give us a fairer price for their services. Doesn’t read well for those responsible for the awarding of contracts at the time.

Would love to know the cost comparison of SGL stewarding after it was hurriedly put in place after the previous contract was discontinued. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Controlling party: The company is under the joint control of The 1877 Society Limited and Kibble Education and Care
Centre.

Is this fan control and ownership? Not sure this is what @smisa deal was or even my understanding after the kibble deal.

Does 51% not mean The 1877 Society Limited are controlling party?

What am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Albanian Buddy said:

That’s superb! Considering we are in a cost of living crisis. 

Excel or (10) sheets?

Or did you do the calculation in your head as you’re a clever banker? 😂 

Ha ha. I used this website….

https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/st-mirren/attendances
…..and a good old fashioned calculator. 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Controlling party: The company is under the joint control of The 1877 Society Limited and Kibble Education and Care
Centre.
Is this fan control and ownership? Not sure this is what[mention=15962]smisa[/mention] deal was or even my understanding after the kibble deal.
Does 51% not mean The 1877 Society Limited are controlling party?
What am I missing?
Because we are working with and not against.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said:

Ha ha. I used this website….

https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/st-mirren/attendances
…..and a good old fashioned calculator. 😀

Interesting as well that our top 3 attendances this season haven’t involved Celtic or Rangers. 
In fact if you looked at the average attendances of the other clubs, I bet they’d be skewed by them having bigger grounds and therefore bigger crowds against the OF. 
Would be interesting to see the average crowds of each team stripping out matches against them. 
For the avoidance of doubt, I was sad enough to take 5 minutes to do ours, I’m no sad enough to do that. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said:

Interesting as well that our top 3 attendances this season haven’t involved Celtic or Rangers. 
In fact if you looked at the average attendances of the other clubs, I bet they’d be skewed by them having bigger grounds and therefore bigger crowds against the OF. 
Would be interesting to see the average crowds of each team stripping out matches against them. 
For the avoidance of doubt, I was sad enough to take 5 minutes to do ours, I’m no sad enough to do that. 🤣

Where's that guy that counts the dots.......he must have plenty time on his hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...