Jump to content

St Mirren v Sevco (2012) SPFL PREMIERSHIP 12/11/22


shull
 Share

Recommended Posts


In determining the validity of the penalty depended on the angle and what camera viewed it.  From one it was and the other it wasn't.  There are two things which are true; there was a definitely a diving element from Kent and defenders should only block rather than tackle as the risk of a penalty is severe especially against a  player as quick as Kent.
Even Marcus has said in the press it was pen. He admits he made a mistake. He said he should have stopped and blocked. Apart from that, he and the rest of the defence were excellent

Sent from my SM-S906B using Tapatalk


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...