Cookie Monster Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 You clearly don't understand the (relatively new) rules mate. It was a red all day long and St. Johnstone obviously know there is no chance of it being overturned.Correct. I don't think there was intent but was classed as not being in control resulting in him stamping on Ryan's ankle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted March 1, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 22 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said: 36 minutes ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said: You clearly don't understand the (relatively new) rules mate. It was a red all day long and St. Johnstone obviously know there is no chance of it being overturned. Correct. I don't think there was intent but was classed as not being in control resulting in him stamping on Ryan's ankle. That's pretty much how it looked to me, reckless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterian Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 1 hour ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said: You clearly don't understand the (relatively new) rules mate. It was a red all day long and St. Johnstone obviously know there is no chance of it being overturned. Still not with it, Flynn stepped into the challenge. Absolutely no malice on the other player’s part. Ridiculous red card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 32 minutes ago, Hunterian said: Still not with it, Flynn stepped into the challenge. Absolutely no malice on the other player’s part. Ridiculous red card. Its endangerment... doesnt matter if he meant it... he could have snapped Flynns leg.. ended his career.. Fakes get it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSS Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 2 hours ago, Hunterian said: Bizarre decision if true, it was barely a yellow 🟥 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterian Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 2 minutes ago, HSS said: 🟥 I’ll need to yield to the forum then, they have spoken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSS Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 9 minutes ago, Hunterian said: I’ll need to yield to the forum then, they have spoken It’s all about opinions bud,nothing wrong with having a different one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Monster Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 Still not with itObviously,Flynn stepped into the challenge. Absolutely no malice on the other player’s part. Ridiculous red card.Phillips was stretching for it as he lost control of the ball.Resulting in him standing on Flynns ankle that he could have quite easily have broke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 1 minute ago, Cookie Monster said: Obviously, Phillips was stretching for it as he lost control of the ball. Resulting in him standing on Flynns ankle that he could have quite easily have broke. Flynn had just made the tackle and nicked the ball away so, as you can clearly see, there's not a chance Philips was "in control" with his challenge. Unless of course, there was intent to "do" Flynn, which I don't think was the case. Straight leg, studs up directly onto Flynn's ankle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santaponsasaint Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 Still not with it, Flynn stepped into the challenge. Absolutely no malice on the other player’s part. Ridiculous red card.Intentional or not its still a red card. That's why they have not challenged it Sent from my SM-S906B using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 I can't believe we're still debating this. Old news. Red card awarded and St Johnstone realise an appeal would be chucked out. Regardless of the rights or wrongs, the situation has been settled and won't be revisited. Can we move on ? Please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Monster Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 I can't believe we're still debating this. Old news. Red card awarded and St Johnstone realise an appeal would be chucked out. Regardless of the rights or wrongs, the situation has been settled and won't be revisited. Can we move on ? Please.Not until Faraway says so. [emoji1787] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterian Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 1 hour ago, santaponsasaint said: Intentional or not its still a red card. That's why they have not challenged it Sent from my SM-S906B using Tapatalk Yeah, I’m onboard now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterian Posted March 1, 2023 Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 1 hour ago, Wilbur said: I can't believe we're still debating this. Old news. Red card awarded and St Johnstone realise an appeal would be chucked out. Regardless of the rights or wrongs, the situation has been settled and won't be revisited. Can we move on ? Please. Sure, what do want to talk about now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted March 1, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2023 1 hour ago, Cookie Monster said: Not until Faraway says so. Ok, it's over. 😜 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.