Jump to content

Dirty Sanchez

Saints
  • Posts

    1,054
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Dirty Sanchez

  1. the image was “flagged by other members of the community”.

    In the unlikely event that I was a member, I'd prefer to flag any image that features some clown who thinks it's compulsory to pout like a Kardashian any time a camera gets pointed at them, which would shut down half of Facebook.

     

  2. There was also a suggestion that further installments of his transfer fee may be due upon him making further appearances, which may or may not be shite, but wouldn't help his cause.

    I also noticed the sprinkling of darkish mental health type posts he's made. There may be more at work here than the manchild image he projects.

  3. On 6/23/2019 at 9:45 PM, bazil85 said:

    I can’t really think of any circumstances in American football where a decision has just been left to a ref. Not a big fan of the sport though granted, for the reasons I’ve quoted 

    i’ll be bitterly disappointed if football is in the same position American football is now at any time in the future. It would have completely taken away what stands our sport above others. But as I have said all along it’s just my opinion. I know the positives of VAR, they’re just not even close to enough for me to want to have it.  

    Most of the game is left to the refs. Only scoring plays and turnovers (i.e. game changers) are automatically reviewed, and you won't see or hear about them unless something is wrong.

    The only other reviews come from coaches challenges, plus booth reviews in the last 2 mins of each half. Together these averaged at fewer than one per team per game last year because it's counterproductive to challenge frivolously. Most things are either non-reviewable by rule, or not worthy of a challenge.

    They didn't arrive at this overnight. I'd be bitterly disappointed if the cack handed stuff we are seeing at this World Cup was the finished article.

  4. On 6/21/2019 at 8:32 AM, bazil85 said:

    VAR is a slippery slope regarding what decisions are checked & what aren’t & can easily lead to a complete review of every single decision. Don’t believe me, look at other games that use video technology, best comparisons probably American football...

    Long story short; that's not correct at all about American football, where video review is strictly limited to certain situations.

    I'm not that impressed with how football has started using video, but the hope is that they iron it out over time,and improve it until it's fully fit for purpose. It's only a slippery slope if they don't properly subscribe to that.

    American football, e.g., is 40 years ahead of us and they've been through the full cycle that we're only at the start of. They tested it years before it was introduced, and faced all the same hostility that we're now seeing in football regarding its introduction. They had mixed results and further hostility when it was brought in, and actually ditched it for a number of years, until a high profile refereeing f**k up, that cost lots of people their jobs, was the impetus to bring it back. They've proactively knocked all the rough edges off it, helped by improved technology and it's now fully accepted. I'd hope that's where football is heading with this.

    In other news, I think the scrutiny of VAR is shining a light on the ropey nature of some of the laws of the game that need addressing.

     

  5. 24 minutes ago, stlucifer said:

    Just watching the Germany Nigeria game and I think VAR is causing problems. The referee has made an horrendous decision for the penalty. I think it's more to do with having the time to see the German player has been hurt rather than what actually caused it. The Nigerian player tries to hit the ball, doesn't get clean contact, though does hit the ball, and her momentum means she hits the German's knee. 

    There's never enough emphasis given to intent in football. I get fed up listening to guys like Chris Sutton looking to have players sent off  for the angle their foot is at, rather than focusing on whether there is actually genuine intent to win the ball, or not.

    Same with handballs. Focus should be on intent, first and foremost.  VAR only gives you a better look at it. Biggest problem is the double whammy of shit refs enforcing flawed laws.

    On that note, it was refreshing to hear the three female pundits point out that the standard of refereeing has been woeful, and it should be the best available top level refs in charge of these games, irrespective of their gender.  

  6. 1 hour ago, Gosport Buddie said:

    https://t.co/Yv6MJDMmMM

    Appears how VAR is used is up to whichever Association is in charge of a specific tournament

    That's good news (VARs in Premier League will not order penalty re-take if goalkeeper comes off line next season) and FIFA would be wise :lol: to a have a rethink and follow suit after this shite.

    Penalties are dead ball situations that can easily be officiated between the ref and assistant on the line. Only egregious examples should be penalised unless they want penalties and particularly penalty shoot outs to become an absolute farce.

    VAR is an excellent tool for referrees to use, but they are in grave danger of spoliing that by cluelessly implementing it.

  7. I wasn't aware that goalkeepers leaving their line at penalties was a big issue that needed addressing.

    Apparently FIFA did!  It's working out pretty well so far,eh? :notworthy Explains the Hladky stuff in the play-off.

    The number of referees who are honking at the job makes things hard enough without giving them shitey guidelines within which to enforce daft rules.

    Handball has needed addressing for years. They've finally addressed it and made it f*cking worse. :happyclapper

  8. 9 hours ago, oaksoft said:

    TBF there was no over-celebrating from what I saw on the highlights and even if there was WGAF.

    These players have dreamed of playing in a World Cup for their whole lives. And they are supposed to tone down their celebrations and restrict it to a handshake? That is a ridiculous thing to ask of professional sportswomen or men. It's not as though they slid along the pitch whirling their tops in the air and screaming in the faces of their opponents.

    Someone online was talking about maybe they should have stepped off the gas and scored fewer goals. Whit???? Whenever I played I wanted to score as many goals as possible. If we were 13-0 up I'd have been barrelling for a 14th. The Americans have the killer instinct. Other teams might do well to consider that.

     

    Piling on the goals is not an issue. Scotland have twice gone out of World Cups on goal difference after failing to pile it on the group whipping boys.

    They are being panned even by their own fans for this, and specifically it's trying to push the narrative towards gender that I'm not a fan of.

×
×
  • Create New...