slapsalmon
-
Posts
746 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by slapsalmon
-
-
5 hours ago, bazil85 said:
Not sure why it's trying to re post my quote from earlier.
A question I'd like to know. If voted through do kibble intend to match any investments made by SMISA Pro rata or will the only investor providing external finance be SMISA. (in the form of the quarterly spend, or loans like for the new astro)
-
Just now, bazil85 said:
Selfless in a purely financial sense, as in return on his financial investment. I’m sure there are other reasons for him doing it but I still think it’s pretty poor people coining this as he isn’t losing any money/ investing in the club.
It's not self less financially though. As by going through with BtB he got back his outlay for the original shares which he may never have got back otherwise. Shrewd probably, selfless I wouldn't say so.
-
4 minutes ago, bazil85 said:
Do you think lost income through investment and interest shouldn't be factored in to his investment in the club? For me this is a curious (and a wee bit selfish) point that some fans bring up. What's the expectation, that he puts in money on top of the lump sum that's allowed us to buy the club? If so, would we grudge him taking a profit out the club like many other football chairman in the world?
GLS has done a fantastic and (financially) self-less thing for our football club, people should not lose sight of that.
Had SMISA bought the 50 odd % from the consortium then GLS shares were worthless. Id say its not entirely self less what he's done. More protecting his initial Investment.
Not getting into a debate over the rights or wrongs of that. Just saying.
-
2 minutes ago, beyond our ken said:
the difference is the number of shares that SMISA can buy-current agreement is for SMISA to take a 75% holding but that will not happen if GLS sells his shares, so SMISA has to propose the change and vote on it
71%
GLS was keeping 8% back in the original proposal. Something which I questioned at the time. Now looks like his 8% is on the table for kibble.
-
1 hour ago, St.Ricky said:
I thought it was 10%. My source was Lewis's mums sisters husband.
So his uncle? 😂😂
-
49 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:
Looks like he is away. Certainly played well for us. Best of luck to him.
Any other insights poirot?
-
39 minutes ago, Eric Arthur Blair said:
I have two IPTV subs, Red TV isn't available on either.
Need to change provider 😉
-
11 hours ago, DougJamie said:
At least they formed their Successful Ticketus Operating Retail Model ( STORM) on the back of it ie Spend what you don't have, borrow on the back of what you don't have, and be All happy that a 7 year old team has a £14m debt when it basically sells out every game...………….
Tick Tock
I believe the debt is more than 14m and they lose around that figure every year. Tick tock indeed. Hopefully nobody at Hampden bends over this time. Long live dave King 😂
-
1 hour ago, Doakes said:
Xtreme codes got taken down so likely to be that way for a while sadly
Most decent suppliers are back up. Just had to roll back and rebuild panels.
-
19 hours ago, bazil85 said:
5. Eh your player budget figure analysis makes absolutely zero sense. You have no idea & it won’t be in the accounts what the budget would have been if they didn’t do the two stand arrangement. It won’t be correlated to the previous season in a different division. Oh you’re in for a disappointment. Fortunately we know it was a 10% increase because someone with full access to the accounts that makes the decisions told us.
If 10% of what the accounts say the wage budget is,turns out to be more than the sum that could be made from the ammount of seats available sold at full price then it'll show that the arrangement couldn't have given a 10% increase.
If 10% is 250k for example then it can't all have been made up by giving away the stand.
-
21 hours ago, Slartibartfast said:
That's exactly what a shull alias would say, hmmm ...
No its not. He'd say, part time, f**kem, too expensive,
-
3 hours ago, Slartibartfast said:
He can see (if he logs out or uses one of his aliases), he just can't respond as himself outside the bin.
Weirdly, what you said sounds like something a shull alias would say to try to get folk to go talk to him because he is bored being all alone in the bin. Hmmmm ...
😂 Definitely not a shull alias.
-
A lot of people with a lot to say about shull while he can't see or respond. This thread and others. You know where he is ffs.
And for the record, don't know him never met him, just find it a bit odd
-
1 hour ago, magnus said:
Jason Naismith.
Did he not also make his debut against morton after an injury and came of at half time?
-
Honestly someone just get basil to f**k
-
34 minutes ago, bazil85 said:
They're all the same opinion though.
As is yours.... Well when it suits haha.
-
4 hours ago, bazil85 said:
I just respond to comments & defend my view. It’s others on here incapable of letting this subject go.
There are plenty of new people voicing their opinion. The constant in the whole thread is you!
-
1 minute ago, bazil85 said:
Trust me, a lot of other fans agree with me on the two stand arrangement.
Those who moan the loudest aren’t automatically a majority. Look at the SMISA thread for example
Trust me, a lot of other fans don't agree with you.
Usual line. Look at SMiSA. Most members don't bother their arse voting, doesn't mean they agree.
-
9 minutes ago, antrin said:
🤣
It's absolute comedy.
I've never seen anyone unite a forum in the way our basil has. The only person who ever agrees with him is Ricky and that tells you all you need to know.
-
1 hour ago, stlucifer said:
When did this happen? I'm no feckin' moving!
It didn't. If you read back kombi suggested it to basil as all St mirren fans would fit in the main and south stand. He wasn't having it for a nonsense reason.
-
9 hours ago, bazil85 said:
Zero. My view on this has not and will never change. If we give tickets to the bigots at the expense of even one fan being able to get a ticket I would not support the arrangement.
I don't believe we wold do that though, GLS has made comment to reviewing the arrangement on increased ticket prices before.
But your not happy with the idea of the North and West being given to them when currently it will not affect one St mirren supporter.
Kombi has you sewn up like a kipper
-
And there we have it, the closest thing to an expert on here(probably) reckons it's on the expensive side.
Now even if div has no interest in creating or maintaining something for this, he's the ideal guy to ask the question of "do you think this is decent value for money"
If there is also a spend limit on what can be approved then the question should've been asked to the membership. If its been thought out and is without doubt the best option then it would probably be approved, but it's about the process. If that's what the process is(and I'm taking LPMs word for it) then the question should've been asked.
That's not negative, it's not moaning about the spend, it's about following any processes that have been agreed. Giving the information and letting people decide.
-
1 hour ago, St.Ricky said:
Only team in Scotland to field a player with the same first and last name. Djemba Djemba.
His first name was eric
-
3 hours ago, Lord Pityme said:
Re that photo above, you widnae be striking that pose in the dressing room if Justin Fashanu was your team mate. With or without the textured crop.
Are you for real? It's 2019
Potential questions for Kibble proposal meeting 6/2/20
in General St. Mirren Discussion
Posted
Do kibble intend to match any SMISA investment(i.e quarterly spend) pro rata.