Jump to content

garzo

Saints
  • Posts

    317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by garzo

  1. Just now, Sgt Schultz said:
    7 minutes ago, garzo said:
    trying to renew my season ticket now. My diary flagged up it was due today so I'm trying to log in.
    To no avail unfortunately. Clicked new password - no email received.
    What should I do?

    Try checking your junk or spam folder as the email may have ended up there.

    Did. No email received unfortunately. 

  2. Options:
    Keep all the money for future share purchase and build up reserves.
    Only release funds in lieu of shares or if investment in club affairs is pro-rata to other major shareholders/ directors or offered as a loan.

    Investment in non club/ community activity perfectly acceptable - voted by smisa members and allocated by smisa as a constituted body.

     

    Can I vote for this?

  3. 7 minutes ago, TediousTom said:

    Its at times like this that young men (and young women, but mostly men) show themselves up to being little more than molly coddled children.

     

    So the Police stopped and searched a bus did they?  Stop greeting like spoilt little bitches.  Man up you entitled baw bags.  If you are law abiding then you have nothing to worry about, otherwise you are a criminal.  Criminals need stamped upon and I have no objection, neigh I welcome some mild inconvenience in eradicating this scum and villainy from our society.  

     

    Fans not criminals are a group?  Are they, they sound like a tracksuit wearing, open toed sandal civil liberty loving tree hugging jizz rags.  Again I refer you to the scum and villainy point above.

     

    The club need to listen to the W7/Supra's/bunch of unhappy pre-pubescent teenagers?  No they don't.  They really don't.  In fact I am disappointed that the club arranged this meeting at all.  The opinion of tracksuits need never be considered. 

     

    The club said this, the tracksuits said that, I didn't see it or I did see it and I am not saying or it didn't happen but it did!  Behave yourselves.  The club owes no-one an explanation.  Like any privately owned business no-one has the right to dictate its actions (that's what directors are for).  

     

    In the wake of a shameful, shameful period for football I would like to see the club, the Scottish government and the Police work together to eradicate this scum element from our game.  Not every tracksuit at the football is a criminal but every criminal at the football wears a tracksuit.  Search every tracksuit in and around the ground, film these tracksuited scum bags, deal severely and without discretion each and every offensive remark, disorderly conduct or thuggish act.  Let us eradicate the tracksuit wearers from the terraces.  I propose a new supporters group

     

    Fans not tracksuits, fans not tracksuits indeed. 

    this is serious?

  4. 1 minute ago, St.Ricky said:

    Earlier comments by w7 members aoperared to damn the SLO with the faintest of praise. 

    I got the drift..  Only direct talks with the board will do. 

    Ah ok. 

    Was thinking from the other direction. Perhaps the board seeking advice from fan representation on general feeling & tone in approach before putting out allegations as facts?

  5. Just now, Sonny said:

    So you know exactly what every St Mirren fan has been doing every game over the last 18 months? The Dundee police made up the lie about fireworks being let off? There was no fighting with Well fans on two separate occasions? The Paisley police and paramedics made up allegations about spitting and coin throwing? Did you see the injured Utd fan being carried through the vormitory in W7 and can swear the spitting and coin throwing did not happen?

    legally these are allegations, not factual or proven
    No problem with allegations being followed up on and action taken, however as we stand at the moment they are all allegations

    Am I wrong?

  6. Just now, oaksoft said:

    So a running list of who is in on the conspiracy against W7.

    Paisley Police.

    Our Board of Directors.

    Paramedics.

    Dundee Police.

    Pub owners at away grounds.

    Our own fans.

    Stewards at home games.

    Stewards at away games.

    Have I missed anyone? You would need to be either part of the group causing trouble, related to one of them or a conspiracy theory crackpot to believe all these people are faking stories about this set of fans. 

    All of them?

  7. 31 minutes ago, Cornwall_Saint said:

    Club Statement on Fans

    We are fortunate to have a very loyal support who travel up and down the country following the team through thick and thin and, as we have previously stated, this is never taken for granted and is much appreciated by everyone connected with St Mirren.

    This season the police have been in dialogue with us over some incidents and behaviour that has taken place predominantly at away games. This relates to a very small number of fans, however, it goes without saying that this negatively affects the reputation of the support as a whole.

    Amongst other things this has involved the setting off of flares, fireworks and smoke bombs, organising fights with opposition supporters and vandalism of public property. These are very serious allegations and seriously tarnish our club’s reputation.

    While the aforementioned are primarily a police issue we are now also seeing instances of this unacceptable behaviour appearing at our home fixtures.

    On Saturday a Dundee Utd supporter suffered a serious head injury after the away crowd surged forward after United’s first goal. This is something we have warned our own support against on numerous occasions so hopefully this will make people realise how dangerous this can be.

    Given the seriousness of the injury the decision was taken to remove the fan by the quickest means possible which was through the vomitory at W7.

    While the unconscious supporter was being removed there were numerous people standing above the vomitory who decided to spit and throw coins at him.

    This is completely and utterly unacceptable. We cannot allow the actions of a very small number of fans to ruin the reputation of St Mirren Football Club.

    Some of the people responsible were identified but unfortunately the quality of the CCTV footage of the incident is such that at this time we are unable to pursue this to the degree of certainty that would allow prosecution.

    If we are able to clearly identify the culprits, regardless of what happens in a legal sense, they will be given a lifetime ban from our stadium.

    We would ask anyone with any information or footage of the incident to contact the club on [email protected].

    Any information provided will be treated in the strictest confidence.

    Everyone connected with the club fully acknowledges the fantastic contribution the W7 group have made to improving the atmosphere at the stadium. Whilst we want to nurture and support the fans in that area of the stadium we are also duty bound to apply the same rules that cover all other areas of all other stands.

    For the avoidance of any doubt antisocial behaviour will not be tolerated in ANY area of our stadium.

    There has been much comment on social media over the weekend regarding all of the above but that is not the place we should be having these conversations especially when people are not aware of all the facts and individuals can twist the truth without the risk of being held accountable for their words.

    As a result of this ongoing situation we have asked local MSP George Adam to arrange a meeting with the police, the club and relevant fan groups to try and find a sensible way forward to get us all pulling in the same direction once more.

    Alleged - that word is missing!!!

  8. 5 hours ago, garzo said:

    Rewind - Question and only 1 question in isolation,

    Do you as SMISA members approve ring fenced funds to be diverted and used at the boards discretion?

    YES/ NO 

    Open to interpretation I suppose. 

    Alternative. 

    Do you as SMISA members approve ring fenced funds, intended to purchase shares in SMFC, to be diverted?

    In emergency situations such as Club no longer able to fulfill its obligations as a company.

    YES/ NO

    or for other purposes such as part funding an Astro training pitch at Ralston. 

    YES/ NO

  9. 12 minutes ago, bazil85 said:

    You asked a question, I answered it, you then said I was sending conflicting messages on the forum because of it...

    i’ll take your word you weren’t trying to catch me out though because let’s be honest it was a very random question with no basis in the debate. 

    So random, you thought it worthy of a response.

    I respect that;  you gave a good answer. 

    The correct answer. Right fenced funds should remain as such. 

    Cheers. 

×
×
  • Create New...