Jump to content

Phil McCracken

Saints
  • Posts

    449
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Phil McCracken

  1. indeed. i mentioned when we signed bsll that there might be similarities with higdon indeed, Sutton, Cameron & yardley all got dogs abuse at one time or another
  2. Leaving aside the fact that there were 3 choices, your post is irrelevant.
  3. Its supposed to prove that the number of no votes was 23.7% greater than the number of yes votes. I know that you have a problem with numbers so don't feel bad.
  4. That's because, as your signature demands, I give foresight As opposed to your hindsight...
  5. Are you justifying your made up figures to yourself or to me?
  6. As I suspected. You just made the figures up off the top of your head. Thanks for confirming.
  7. No = 2,001,926 Yes = 1,617,989 2,001,926 / 1,617,989 - 1 = 23.7%
  8. my mother in law has lived in 'poverty' for 40 years she voted no
  9. How did you arrive at those figures of 2-5%? Did you just make them up off the top of your head? On your second point, do you know a 'hue amount' of people? And specifically, do you know a 'huge amount' of people who were going to vote yes and then switched to yes? How many people are we talking about? How did you ask them all? Did you manage to ask them all over the weekend? Or did you just make that up off the top of your head as well?...
  10. Fans are hardly going to complain when we've won...
  11. A Tory / UKIP coalition? I would have thought that, under the 'first past the post' system, UKIP's vote will end allowing The Lib Dems and Labour to win seats they wouldn't otherwise.
  12. Even more lies, damned lies and statistics right enough... You've forgotten to factor in that the teenagers who voted this time will be more mature and grown up in by the time the next referendum comes around and will be more likely to vote no. Of course, for there to ever be a referendum, the SNP needs to win a majority of MPs again at Holyrood. That will be a tough ask. The Unionist parties now have the selling point of voting against the SNP to avoid another referendum and the advantage that no voters are more likely to vote in 'normal' elections than yes voters. As an example, Perth is an SNP stronghold with SNP MP, MSPs & a council. Yet Perth voted heavily no. Folk will be much less likely to vote SNP in future knowing the consequences and another referendum.
  13. It seems the more affluent the area, the higher was the no vote in general, to use slartibartfast's terminology, it was life's losers who voted yes it was a landslide no in the capital as Glasgow, n lanarkshire & w dunbartonshire r all co joined, maybe they could declare independence and leave the rest of us to get on with it? we could even build a new independent corridor road up to dundee build a big fence to keep them in and give them an annual payment towards their giros?
  14. if they come up with a way of stopping Scots mps voting on ruk issues them its not the tories who will be the problem... the tories devolution plans go much further than labour and there is a very good reason for that for some odd reason, people have been banging on about the tories wanting a no vote in pretty sure the English tories would have been happy had we voted yes
  15. i made no attack and no mistakeyou are a thick simpleton baldyoz a very thick simpleton go f**k yourself!
  16. shouting my mouth off about what? its you that brought Montenegro into the conversation! i know nothing at all about Montenegro, its referendum nor its independence and neither do i care. I have done zero research on it, why would i. its you who is the loud mouthed ignorant dunderheid hsbc, montenegro, jolly jape the wheel is still spinning but tthe hamster is dead!
  17. that Montenegro voted for independence? wow that's a jolly jape does hsbc operate there?
  18. federal uk okay with me means we have economic and monetary union that's not wot u voted for though. U wanted to put up barriers to trade with your xenophobic, little scotlander views
  19. you were the one 'gloating' yesterday ahead of wot u thot would be a yes winyou were the one telling the no side to get the pampers ready as for the scare storied, yeh, i ignored the yes campaign scare stories and i voted no dry yer eyes
  20. A comfortable no win, as predicted. big crowds in the centre of Glasgow this morning as i cycled to Buchanan street
×
×
  • Create New...