indeed.
i mentioned when we signed bsll that there might be similarities with higdon
indeed, Sutton, Cameron & yardley all got dogs abuse at one time or another
Its supposed to prove that the number of no votes was 23.7% greater than the number of yes votes.
I know that you have a problem with numbers so don't feel bad.
How did you arrive at those figures of 2-5%?
Did you just make them up off the top of your head?
On your second point, do you know a 'hue amount' of people? And specifically, do you know a 'huge amount' of people who were going to vote yes and then switched to yes? How many people are we talking about? How did you ask them all? Did you manage to ask them all over the weekend?
Or did you just make that up off the top of your head as well?...
A Tory / UKIP coalition?
I would have thought that, under the 'first past the post' system, UKIP's vote will end allowing The Lib Dems and Labour to win seats they wouldn't otherwise.
Even more lies, damned lies and statistics right enough...
You've forgotten to factor in that the teenagers who voted this time will be more mature and grown up in by the time the next referendum comes around and will be more likely to vote no.
Of course, for there to ever be a referendum, the SNP needs to win a majority of MPs again at Holyrood. That will be a tough ask. The Unionist parties now have the selling point of voting against the SNP to avoid another referendum and the advantage that no voters are more likely to vote in 'normal' elections than yes voters.
As an example, Perth is an SNP stronghold with SNP MP, MSPs & a council. Yet Perth voted heavily no. Folk will be much less likely to vote SNP in future knowing the consequences and another referendum.
It seems the more affluent the area, the higher was the no vote
in general, to use slartibartfast's terminology, it was life's losers who voted yes
it was a landslide no in the capital
as Glasgow, n lanarkshire & w dunbartonshire r all co joined, maybe they could declare independence and leave the rest of us to get on with it?
we could even build a new independent corridor road up to dundee
build a big fence to keep them in and give them an annual payment towards their giros?
if they come up with a way of stopping Scots mps voting on ruk issues them its not the tories who will be the problem...
the tories devolution plans go much further than labour
and there is a very good reason for that
for some odd reason, people have been banging on about the tories wanting a no vote
in pretty sure the English tories would have been happy had we voted yes
shouting my mouth off about what?
its you that brought Montenegro into the conversation!
i know nothing at all about Montenegro, its referendum nor its independence and neither do i care. I have done zero research on it, why would i.
its you who is the loud mouthed ignorant dunderheid
hsbc, montenegro, jolly jape
the wheel is still spinning but tthe hamster is dead!
federal uk okay with me
means we have economic and monetary union
that's not wot u voted for though. U wanted to put up barriers to trade with your xenophobic, little scotlander views
you were the one 'gloating' yesterday ahead of wot u thot would be a yes winyou were the one telling the no side to get the pampers ready
as for the scare storied, yeh, i ignored the yes campaign scare stories and i voted no
dry yer eyes