Jump to content

Slarti

Saints
  • Posts

    3,453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Posts posted by Slarti

  1. 7 minutes ago, The Original 59er said:

    I've been able to do a wee bit more research and the maps below begin to tell the picture.

    1st Map 1947 clearly showing the Alex opposite the RAH on the corner of Orr St

    2nd Map same in 1951

    3rd map is a 1965 edition, but actually was already 3 years out of date as the area was surveyed in '62 and still shows the Alex Cinema building.

    4th map 1967 showing what might appear to be a petrol station with the number 23 Neilston Road

    lastly today

    Alex cinema 1947.jpg

    Alex cinema 1951.jpg

    Alex cinema site 1965.jpg

    Alex cinema site 1967.jpg

    Alex cinema site Now.jpg

    Yeah, the 4th one looks like the way the petrol station was laid out.

  2. Arsenal won 2-1, Spurs, after a decent run of form, were hopeless. 
    Currently Man Utd 0-0 West Ham, half time.
    No watching it but the stats suggest it's one way traffic for United. 
    Seeing as it's Utd v Utd, that not really much of a surprise. [emoji1787]
  3. That's not the topic on this thread though. It's a complaint about that thread being deleted. IMO, the original discussion was done to death and had meandered so it being deleted didn't mean a damn thing in the larger scheme. IF BinEK really wanted to make something of it there was/are better platforms to make the complaint. He was simply making a comment and that comment was commented on. Given the length of the thread I'm sure everyone who wanted to contribute had done so and I never saw one person change there stance so it impacted on no one when it was deleted.
    But it is what you spent most of your post talking about, and that is what I addressed.

    This thread is actually about a perceived overreaction, hence the title.


  4. Did he? Where did he "own me"? I said the thread had been done to death. It had. IF someone wanted it taken seriously and followed up, a wee fans' forum isn't going to cut it. IF the poster seriously thought something was so foul that it needed to be addressed then a wee fans' forum isn't the place to get justice. I never once said it shouldn't have been discussed. I said, and I repeat, there are far better platforms to air this and have it taken further. To bleat on about a thread being deleted as if it was going to change the world is ludicrous.  


    The original thread on this forum was about comments made on this forum, therefore the logical place for the thread/discussion is definitely this forum.

    No matter a person's opinion, or lack of opinion, on the comments, the fact is that this forum was the right and logical place for the discussion.


  5. Let's put this into some perspective here.
    The chances of catching the virus, despite the media continuing with their scaremongering, is very small.
    The chances of coming to any great harm is also very small, the death rate per million is less than .2%
    These minute chances are very much reduced if you have the vaccine.
    Now I'll be quite happy with my vaccination passport, and content that everyone else on the plane has one.
    When I get off the plane, I'll be comfortable enough that me, and my wife, as I'm a selfish b'strd, will be pretty safe as we'd go to a destination that has also a very safe environment.   [emoji14]


    A bit pedantic here but 0.2% per million is 0.2% per whatever number you feckin want.
  6. The only series I've watched since watching The 100 first 3 seasons, some twist in the last episode [emoji44]
    I thought it was pretty shit and the "twist" could be seen coming from about 1/4 of the way through. Each to their own, though.


  7. Oh come on slarti.
    Enough with the denial and the "devil's advocate" shite.
    You read and took part in the entire thread. You know EXACTLY what he is getting at.


    I'm not in denial, nor playing DA.

    You admitted not knowing what the comments were and nobody else, apart from BiEK, seems to have seen them. BiEK found something offensive and you have jumped on the self-righteous bandwagon without even knowing what you are being self-righteous about. You're being ridiculous.

    Also, did you see anyone defending the comments that they didn't see?
  8. The wee fans forum was exactly where the original transgression occurred and where some felt it appropriate to defend it!

    What a daft self defeating post! You just reactivated this one! [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
    Who defended it?

    As far as I saw, nobody else admitted to seeing it or knowing what it said.


  9. I thought you were done?

    Deflecting, squirming? Nope, not I. You’re the one that’s making an arse of himself.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

    Figures I quoted were from the above link. You may want to check this fellow’s video on Ivermectin.

    So you rubbish claims about Ivermectin saving lives because it’s only fit for animals (in your words) so I assume you wouldn’t take it.

    Do you see how stupid you’re coming across. You’ve totally dismissed a drug that is being used successfully but willing to take a vaccine that hasn’t been tried and tested.

    BTW. I’m not in the anti vaccine camp, I am however concerned that healthy people are dying after taking a vaccine and it’s not even making the news, hence the reason countries have pulled the plug until they’ve completed further studies.

    Here’s a scenario. You catch Covid and the doc says........ “Faraway. We have this drug called ivermectin which could help with your condition and we can monitor you for 48 hours,or you go into intensive care and we hook you up to a ventilator and put you in a coma”. What would you do?

    Apparently 6 care home residents in England died today with another 3 seriously ill. All had previously tested positive for Covid and all had been vaccinated. It’s said those that died, died from Covid.
    Aye, we know, the vaccine doesn't protect you from auld age.


  10. So your response to the guff is to dig around for another load of drivel?
    Do you actually read these things, and look further than the headlines? 
    Can Ivermectin be used to treat COVID-19 (coronavirus)? (drugs.com)
    Here....................this is the lot that run this latest shiote website, you sure are off your head chap.
     
    The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is a conservative non-profit association founded in 1944. The group was reported to have about 5,000 members in 2014. The association has promoted a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that “gay” male lifestyle increases the incidence of infectious disease, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. It is opposed to the Affordable Care Act and other forms of universal health insurance.

    Is Ivermectin an approved medicine by the FDA?

    Ivermectin tablets (Stromectol) is an approved medicine by the FDA for use in intestinal worms Strongyloides stercoralis and Onchocerca volvulus

    Ivermectin intended for animal use should not be taken by humans



    So they are right wing religious nut jobs from the USA who also just happen to be doctors.


  11. It's not going to go away either.
    Adapt or die.
    Just like the dinosaurs, you're going to be blown away otherwise.
    This is a problem for you and the likes of FS, not me.
    Have you not got some clouds to shake your fist at and shout at?


    I get blown on a regular basis, thank you.

    Why is it a problem for me? I've never even put my opinion forward on here about the treatment of women. All I did was ask a couple of simple questions that you and others avoided. You have absolutely no idea of my opinion on it.

    Anyway, I think this is the wrong thread for getting into this.





  12. Similar for me, guess we're just privileged. [emoji16]
     
    Oh the pair of you are special alright. [emoji14]
    To be honest, I was waiting on a "male privilege" type of reply (due to your patronising rants elsewhere).
×
×
  • Create New...