proudtobeabuddy
-
Posts
3,137 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by proudtobeabuddy
-
-
5 minutes ago, Mid Calder Saint said:
Why did we not use all four subs like Well! Jim’s main problem is the squads inbalance a couple of defenders on bench would have enabled us to shore up defence to help our young centre backs this has to be addressed immediately.
I agree but Kirk Wank Broadfoot buggering off at the last minute scuppered that, Jim will address this in the summer i have no doubt.
-
8 minutes ago, W6er said:
The strangest game I have ever seen in my life. Best £12 I have ever spent. I was saying at half time that we can't throw away a 3 goal lead. But all's well that ends well.
My brother was saying it and i stupidly said no chance... what a bloody game though, nerve wracking at the penalties and great celebrations at the end! It's a learning curve for Jim, perhaps better to not try and sit on a lead for so long, maybe revert to those tactics in the last 20 mins but were very impressive when we played on the offensive.
-
You can buy them at the gate.
Cheers[emoji106] -
I've not bought a ticket yet can you still get them at the st Mirren ticket office?
-
Perfect results for us if we can pick up some points in our game in hand.
-
3 hours ago, pod said:
Why are we even in the Premiership, why didn't we just remain in Championship. Problem solved.
I work in an environment full of bigots, but I'm not going to give it up, because it pays good money.
If one lived next door to you, would you sell your house.
Like to see how it will all be handled when or if fans take over.
Can't compare , in your job if it was sectarian abuse being dished out that's a sacking offence. A neighbour is just one person, who can be ignored easier. When i was younger it might have been the norm to put up with bigoted pish but back then it was the norm for homophobia and racism...is that also snowflake behaviour if you take offence to that?
-
This might be of benefit to us for the cup game, 3 games in the next 6 days would have been hard.
-
Just now, St.Ricky said:
Is the issue about the behaviour of the away support? If so then use every avenue to complain. The other thing to do is buy more tickets for these games and make it impossible for the business to use the three home stands to house away fans.
So if that's not going to happen then just continually put up with it?
-
1 minute ago, St.Ricky said:
Then press the club and SPFL to take action. Contact your MSP, Complain to the Police and keep doing it until action is taken.
I'll crack the jokes.
-
8 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:
Why?
For the reason i've stated already it shouldn't always be about money especially in these circumstances.
-
When do we ever see any rangers or Celtic fans thrown out at our ground? Never.... and that's because they can do what they want. Just because it's happened all our lifetimes doesn't mean it's ever been right. Sometimes money is not the most important thing, this is one of these times.
-
16 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:
A difficult but correct decision. In time this will adjust if we continue to build home support at recent rates. A plus 60% over the last few years. Now running around 4 300. We are able to add around 25% more without starting to cut the allocation for visiting fans. Can it be done? I believe so.
As to toxic atmosphere.. I deplore sectarianism. But.. I think that inside the ground at least, there is a reduction in these types of songs and chants.
Looking at our own house.. Those of us there may well be St Mirren Supporters but we are no Saints in the giving out verbal stick department.
Not correct. and never will be.
-
33 minutes ago, W6er said:
Toxic atmosphere? When did society become so sensitive and delicate?
I'm not ultra sensitive but i'm deadly against sectarianism, bad enough at the away end but to have it right in your face at the home end is even worse.
-
22 minutes ago, shull said:
After time served, these pieces of vermin are made very welcome to sit in our Family Stand among other vile cnuts while our football minded children are excluded.
It's the one thing i'll never agree with our board on, no money or extra players is worth the toxic atmosphere they bring.
-
This thread will go back and forth with the same old posters posting the same old argument especially Dickson...
-
Roll on the vote closing...
-
So. Does that mean you think you ARE stupid/
Just asking. 🤣
Maybe I’m behaving stupidly by engaging with the biggest troll in the history of St Mirren forums [emoji851] -
1 hour ago, div said:
I cast my vote this morning, made up my mind over the weekend after reviewing all the information to hand.
Comfortable with my own decision but if the majority vote the other way I won't lose too much sleep over it.
That's the way i feel, if it goes ahead then good IMO, if not...c'est la vie.
-
The 2 kibble fellas at the meeting are not St Mirren fans,
Neither was Tony Fitzpatrick before he came to St Mirren... -
So its trolling to point out how any future boardroom issue could pan out?
These be some of the same reasonable people who promised fans would be consulted before any decision to accommodate extra sectarianism/bigotry/racism for cash?
I’m against the home stand being used and always have been. -
I am a fat twat, so I take it you are admitting you are stupid....
I read the legal agreement - I would hope that SMISA members would too. This change to BTB is extremely significant. If "fans" of the club can't treat this with the serious consideration it deserves then fan ownership really is a f**ked model. Stop posting shite on the forum and use your spare time to get clued up on one of the biggest decisions St Mirren fans have been asked to make about the club in decades.
No I’m not stupid but thanks for clarifying [emoji3] -
Not on religious grounds, but given the forms of addiction some of their clients will have been unfortunate to be trapped in, it would be difficult, if nigh on impossible for them to align their brand with betting, lending, pawning, alcohol etc...
Ironically That just about covers 71% of main sponsors in football@
Eh that leaves 29% lets go with them [emoji23] -
They have voted and a veto on the board, they can pass or block what they like. Also given the chairman brought them in with them paying him £300k, I am sure they'll have at least one other vote to count on.
Having watched the video I’m sure these people are sane reasonable people who want what is best for Kibble and also St Mirren.. just because all the trolls on here think differently is irrelevant. -
I could only speculate, however the fact is that Portamahock is 100% correct. It is right there in the legal agreement you are being asked to sanction. Kibble WOULD be able to block a major sponsor if they didn't like it. Yet despite it being there in the legal agreement you want to defend your initial stupidity by casting aspersions on those who are pointing out this fact to you.
Tell me, you didn't happen to offer your wisdom to Hamilton Accies when they signed away their fortunes did you? After all why would a rich Nigerian Prince have his eyes on a relatively small sum of money in a Scottish Football club bank account.
In the video they already reference that Kibble would have blocked St Mirren having "Wonga" as a shirt sponsor so the exact scenario has already been stated. If you can't grasp why a religious charity might block a rich bookie from sponsoring St Mirren you are even more stupid that I gave you credit for and that is before you factor in the undisputed fact that the Kibble representatives on the football board do not have to be St Mirren fans - infact they are highly unlikely to be St Mirren fans.
Personally, I am relatively comfortable with the deal but one thing is painfully obvious. The new deal that SMISA want their membership to sign up to gives the members less control over their football club than was initially the aim. Despite still having a majority shareholding, Kibble would hold a veto against any major decisions the fans make.
Calling me stupid Is like me calling you a fat twat... childish and boring. But then I’m not the troll here...
Motherwell v St Mirren Scottish Cup Replay 18/2/20
in Matchday & Travel Club
Posted
He's got to be pretty unfit to not be used but maybe he'll be the difference come the split and worth the wait, let's hope so.